Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning

With the communicative turn in planning theory and the emergence of governance, public participation has become a central issue with respect to inclusionary discourse and the institutionalization of more democratic planning practices. A multitude of participatory planning practices have been implemented with reference to different theoretical perspectives and technical approaches ranging from the traditional to the radical model. Although the current debate about these different participatory activities has brought to the fore an increasing gap between rhetoric and the reality of various models, there are few attempts to compare them in practice. A comparison of participatory activities according to traditional/tokenist and radical models, respectively, should be of interest in the current debate on the crisis of participatory planning and barriers to the institutionalization of participatory planning. This paper discusses tokenist participation in the development planning of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm, Sweden and political activism in a deprived community, Enziteto in Bari, Italy. These two different examples of planner–'community' interaction show the necessity to understand power politics that underlie the ideal of public participation in planning.

[1]  G. Walker,et al.  Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning , 2005 .

[2]  Nigel Taylor,et al.  Urban Planning Theory Since 1945 , 1998 .

[3]  Victoria A. Beard.  Learning Radical Planning: The Power of Collective Action , 2003 .

[4]  R. Burby.  Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action , 2003 .

[5]  Sherry R. Amstein.  “A Ladder of Citizen Participation” , 1969 .

[6]  Silvia Saccomani,et al.  From urban renewal to local development. New conceptions and governance practices in the Italian peripheries , 2004 .

[7]  J. Drexler.  Politics Improper: Iris Marion Young, Hannah Arendt, and the Power of Performativity , 2007, Hypatia.

[8]  Joseph H. Kupfer.  Gandhi and the Virtue of Care , 2007, Hypatia.

[9]  Alexander Aylett,et al.  Participatory Planning, Justice, and Climate Change in Durban, South Africa , 2010 .

[10]  L. Sandercock,et al.  Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities , 1997 .

[11]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work , 2002 .

[12]  John Friedmann.  Life space and economic space : essays in Third World planning , 1988 .

[13]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  Civic Capital as the Missing Link , 2010 .

[14]  J. Friedmann,et al.  Cities for citizens : planning and the rise of civil society in a global age , 1998 .

[15]  G. Mohan,et al.  Relocating participation within a radical politics of development , 2005 .

[16]  H. Campbell.  Planning: an idea of value , 2002 .

[17]  I. Young,et al.  Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[18]  Bas Waterhout,et al.  The Institutionalisation of European Spatial Planning , 2008 .

[19]  The epistemology of social practice , 1978 .

[20]  J. Carpenter,et al.  Approaches to Democratic Involvement: Widening Community Engagement in the English Planning System , 2008 .

[21]  H. Campbell,et al.  Moral Obligations, Planning, and the Public Interest: A Commentary on Current British Practice , 2000 .

[22]  P. Newman,et al.  Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects , 1996 .

[23]  J. Innes.  Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice , 1995 .

[24]  The Social Democratic State , 1995 .

[25]  M. Kesby,et al.  Retheorizing Empowerment‐through‐Participation as a Performance in Space: Beyond Tyranny to Transformation , 2005, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[26]  Miguel A. Martínez.  The Citizen Participation of Urban Movements in Spatial Planning: A Comparison between Vigo and Porto , 2011 .

[27]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[28]  Andrew Byerley,et al.  What is the good city , 2013 .

[29]  J. Friedmann,et al.  Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development , 1994 .

[30]  F. Miraftab,et al.  Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship , 2005 .

[31]  J. Kooiman,et al.  Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions , 1993 .

[32]  M. Graziano.  The Failure of Italian Nationhood: The Geopolitics of a Troubled Identity , 2010 .

[33]  Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics , 2001 .

[34]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[35]  Mark Purcell.  Resisting Neoliberalization: Communicative Planning or Counter-Hegemonic Movements? , 2009 .

[36]  S. Enemark.  Spatial Planning Systems in Europe: An Overview of the EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies , 1996 .

[37]  S. Žižek.  The ticklish subject : the absent centre of political ontology , 1999 .

[38]  Archon Fung.  Deliberation before the Revolution , 2005 .

[39]  C. Mouffe.  ThePolitical , 2019, The Licit Life of Capitalism.

[40]  D. Day.  Citizen Participation in the Planning Process: An Essentially Contested Concept? , 1997 .

[41]  D. Stead,et al.  European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning , 2008 .

[42]  M. Graziano.  The Failure of Italian Nationhood , 2010 .

[43]  J. Friedmann.  Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action , 2020 .

[44]  F. Miraftab.  Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South , 2009 .

[45]  G. Baeten.  Cliches of Urban Doom : The Dystopian Politics of Metaphors for the Unequal City - a View from Brussels , 2001 .

[46]  A. Khakee,et al.  Negotiative land-use and deliberative environmental planning in Italy and Sweden , 2003 .

[47]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[48]  Patsy Healey Obe.  Civic engagement, spatial planning and democracy as a way of life , 2008 .

[49]  A. Hill,et al.  Governance of territorial and urban policies , 2006 .