The Effects of Responsible Gambling Pop-Up Messages on Gambling Behaviors and Cognitions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pop-up messages utilized by gambling operators are normally presented to gamblers during gambling sessions in order to prevent excessive gambling and/or to help in the appraisal of maladaptive gambling cognitions. However, the effect of such messages on gambling behavior and gambling cognitions has not previously been synthesized quantitatively. Consequently, a meta-analysis estimating the efficacy of pop-up messages on gambling behavior and cognitions was conducted. A systematic literature search with no time constraints was performed on Web of Science, PsychInfo, Medline, PsychNET, and the Cochrane Library. Search terms included “gambling,” “pop-up,” “reminder,” “warning message,” and “dynamic message.” Studies based on randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs and pre-post studies reporting both pre- and post-pop-up data were included. Two authors independently extracted data using pre-defined fields including quality assessment. A total of 18 studies were included and data were synthesized using a random effects model estimating Hedges' g. The effects of pop-ups were g = 0.413 for cognitive measures (95% CI = 0.115–0.707) and g = 0.505 for behavioral measures (95% CI = 0.256–0.746). For both outcomes there was significant between-study heterogeneity which could not be explained by setting (laboratory vs. naturalistic) or sample (gambler vs. non-gamblers). It is concluded that pop-up messages provide moderate effects on gambling behavior and cognitions in the short-term and that such messages play an important role in the gambling operators' portfolio of responsible gambling tools.

[1]  J. Odeberg,et al.  A systematic review of educational programs and consumer protection measures for gambling: an extension of previous reviews , 2020 .

[2]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Considering the Public Health and Reno Models: Strategic and Tactical Approaches for Dealing with Gambling-Related Harms , 2019, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[3]  Alex M. T. Russell,et al.  Making EGMs Accountable: Can an Informative and Dynamic Interface Help Players Self-regulate? , 2019, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[4]  Le Phuong Thao,et al.  Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study , 2019, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[5]  Zaheer Hussain,et al.  The impact of pop-up warning messages of losses on expenditure in a simulated game of online roulette: a pilot study , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[6]  T. Torsheim,et al.  Predictors of Gamblers Beliefs About Responsible Gambling Measures , 2019, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[7]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  A limit approaching pop-up message reduces gambling expenditures, except among players with a financially focused self-concept , 2019, International Gambling Studies.

[8]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  When should players be taught to gamble responsibly? Timing of educational information upregulates responsible gambling intentions , 2019, Addiction Research & Theory.

[9]  Mary Beth Miller,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions for Problematic Gambling , 2019, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[10]  J. Denison,et al.  The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies , 2019, Systematic Reviews.

[11]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Pharmacological Treatments for Disordered Gambling: A Meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[12]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Gambling, motor cautiousness, and choice impulsivity: An experimental study , 2018, Journal of Behavioral Addictions.

[13]  M. Browne,et al.  Exploring the Effectiveness of an Intelligent Messages Framework for Developing Warning Messages to Reduce Gambling Intensity , 2018, Journal of Gambling Issues.

[14]  Seth W. Whiting,et al.  Mindfulness-Based Approaches in the Treatment of Disordered Gambling , 2018 .

[15]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Does Individual Gambling Behavior Vary across Gambling Venues with Differing Numbers of Terminals? An Empirical Real-World Study using Player Account Data , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[16]  L. Hancock,et al.  Replacing the Reno Model with a Robust Public Health Approach to “Responsible Gambling”: Hancock and Smith’s Response to Commentaries on Our Original Reno Model Critique , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[17]  M. Young,et al.  Rehabilitating Reno: a Commentary on Hancock and Smith , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[18]  Daniel L. King,et al.  Blame It on Reno: a Commentary on Hancock and Smith , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[19]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Efficacy of face-to-face versus self-guided treatments for disordered gambling: A meta-analysis , 2017, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[20]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Responsible gambling: a synthesis of the empirical evidence , 2017 .

[21]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  How much have you won or lost? Personalized behavioral feedback about gambling expenditures regulates play , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  J. Whelan,et al.  Warning messages for electronic gambling machines: evidence for regulatory policies , 2017 .

[23]  L. Hancock,et al.  Critiquing the Reno Model I-IV International Influence on Regulators and Governments (2004–2015)— the Distorted Reality of “Responsible Gambling” , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[24]  D. Mazmanian,et al.  Harm reduction in gambling: a systematic review of industry strategies , 2017 .

[25]  L. Hedges,et al.  Basics of meta‐analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity , 2017, Research synthesis methods.

[26]  M. Browne,et al.  Breaking Bad: Comparing Gambling Harms Among Gamblers and Affected Others , 2017, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[27]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Problem gambling worldwide: An update and systematic review of empirical research (2000–2015) , 2016, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[29]  J. Whelan,et al.  Gambling warning messages: The impact of winning and losing on message reception across a gambling session. , 2016, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[30]  A. Parke,et al.  The Interaction of Gambling Outcome and Gambling Harm-Minimisation Strategies for Electronic Gambling: the Efficacy of Computer Generated Self-Appraisal Messaging , 2016, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[31]  M. Abbott,et al.  The Effects of Pop-up Harm Minimisation Messages on Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling Behaviour in New Zealand , 2016, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[32]  Matthew Rockloff,et al.  Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[33]  M. Browne,et al.  Jackpot Expiry: An Experimental Investigation of a New EGM Player-Protection Feature , 2015, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[34]  Sally M. Gainsbury,et al.  Optimal content for warning messages to enhance consumer decision making and reduce problem gambling , 2015 .

[35]  B. Hemmelgarn,et al.  The efficacy of motivational interviewing for disordered gambling: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Addictive behaviors.

[36]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Testing normative and self-appraisal feedback in an online slot-machine pop-up in a real-world setting , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[37]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Is ''pop-up'' messaging in online slot machine gambling effective as a responsible gambling strategy? , 2014 .

[38]  Avi Parush,et al.  Building it better: Applying human-computer interaction and persuasive system design principles to a monetary limit tool improves responsible gambling , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  Pop-up messages, dissociation, and craving: how monetary limit reminders facilitate adherence in a session of slot machine gambling. , 2013, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[40]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  Facilitating Responsible Gambling: The Relative Effectiveness of Education-Based Animation and Monetary Limit Setting Pop-up Messages Among Electronic Gaming Machine Players , 2012, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[41]  Sally Melissa Gainsbury,et al.  Are Psychology University Student Gamblers Representative of Non-university Students and General Gamblers? A Comparative Analysis , 2012, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[42]  E. Wulfert,et al.  The use of messages in altering risky gambling behavior in experienced gamblers. , 2012, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[43]  D. Hodgins,et al.  Hesitation to Seek Gambling-related Treatment Among Ontario Problem Gamblers , 2012, Journal of addiction medicine.

[44]  T. Wilt,et al.  Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  Sally Melissa Gainsbury,et al.  The Appropriateness of Using Laboratories and Student Participants in Gambling Research , 2011, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[46]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Responsible Gambling: General Principles and Minimal Requirements , 2011, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[47]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[48]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Impact of Mode of Display and Message Content of Responsible Gambling Signs for Electronic Gaming Machines on Regular Gamblers , 2010, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[49]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, PloS one.

[51]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[52]  D. Hodgins,et al.  Treatment seeking among Ontario problem gamblers: results of a population survey. , 2008, Psychiatric services.

[53]  Sally Monaghan,et al.  Review of Pop-Up Messages on Electronic Gaming Machines as a Proposed Responsible Gambling Strategy , 2008, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[54]  S. Pallesen,et al.  Outcome of Pharmacological Treatments of Pathological Gambling: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 2007, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[55]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Recall of electronic gaming machine signs: A static versus a dynamic mode of presentation , 2007 .

[56]  Serge Sévigny,et al.  Responsible Gambling Tools: Pop-Up Messages and Pauses on Video Lottery Terminals , 2006, The Journal of psychology.

[57]  J. Whelan,et al.  Use of warning messages to modify gambling beliefs and behavior in a laboratory investigation. , 2006, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[58]  Michael C. Wendl,et al.  Argonaute—a database for gene regulation by mammalian microRNAs , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[59]  R. Ladouceur,et al.  Awareness of independence of events and erroneous perceptions while gambling. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[60]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[61]  G. Madden,et al.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. , 2003, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[62]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[63]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[64]  R. Ladouceur,et al.  Social cost of pathological gambling , 1994, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[65]  Gary McClelland,et al.  Hypothetical and Real Consequences in Experimental Auctions for Insurance against Low Probability Risks , 1992 .

[66]  Sarah Tremblay,et al.  Ecological validity of laboratory studies of videopoker gaming , 1991, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[67]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[68]  Mahesh S. Patel An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health policy.

[69]  Yves Tourigny,et al.  Risk-taking behavior in gamblers and non-gamblers during prolonged exposure , 1987, Journal of gambling behavior.

[70]  R. Orwin A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[71]  P. Loy International Classification of Diseases--9th revision. , 1978, Medical record and health care information journal.

[72]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[73]  D. W. Bolen,et al.  Gambling and the gambler. A review and preliminary findings. , 1968, Archives of general psychiatry.

[74]  A. Blaszczynski,et al.  Extending the RENO model: Clinical and ethical applications. , 2016, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[75]  D. Mizerski,et al.  Boomerang Effects of Gambling Warnings Exposed to Non-problem Gamblers , 2012 .

[76]  Sally Monaghan,et al.  Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[77]  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Edited by Julian P. T. Higgins & , 2006 .

[78]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  A Science-Based Framework for Responsible Gambling: The Reno Model , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[79]  Howard J. Shaffer,et al.  Gambling and the Health of the Public: Adopting a Public Health Perspective , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.