Application of System Dynamics Modeling for the Assessment of Training Performance Effectiveness

System Dynamics Modeling (SDM) is a mathematical technique to understand the behavior of complex systems over time. SDM has been widely used and applied in modeling complex systems such as human performance and social network analysis. This paper highlights key features of the system dynamics approach for human performance modeling and training optimization. Using three of the Big Five factors which include Conscientiousness, Extroversion, and Openness, modeling results show how these factors interact and influence training performance. This research sum arizes the development of a system dynamics model for use in evaluating training performance, acquired personality traits and overall system effects on training proficiency.

[1]  Steven Pulos,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Personality Assessments as Predictors of Military Aviation Training Success , 2009 .

[2]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[3]  G. Blickle.  Personality traits, learning stratigies, and performance , 1996 .

[4]  John W. Lounsbury,et al.  Openness and Job Performance in U.S.-Based Japanese Manufacturing Companies , 2000 .

[5]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  S. Mineka,et al.  Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. , 1994, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Ra Thiétart,et al.  Human dynamics: A new approach to human behavior , 1977 .

[8]  Daniel L. Dolgin,et al.  Predicting Military Flight Training Success by a Compensatory Tracking Task , 1989 .

[9]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[11]  C. Parsons,et al.  DISPOSITIONAL INFLUENCES ON TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN MULTISTAGE TRAINING PROGRAMS , 2002 .

[12]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  T R Carretta,et al.  PILOT SELECTION METHODS. IN: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY , 2003 .

[14]  J. Bradley Morrison,et al.  Dynamic Complexity in Military Planning : A Role for System Dynamics , 2008 .

[15]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  J. Sterman.  Business Dynamics , 2000 .

[17]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[19]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[20]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Role of ability and prior knowledge in complex training performance. , 1995 .

[21]  M. R. Roux‐Zink.  An investigation of the development of expertise: The personality traits of Human Performance Improvement experts, as measured by the Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness (NEO) Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) , 2012 .

[22]  J. Salgado.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[24]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. , 1998 .

[25]  Michele Morales Olea,et al.  Predicting pilot and navigator criteria : not much more than g , 1994 .