Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety.

In Chile, as in most less-developed nations, if life savings are valued at all the human capital approach is used in a rather non-consistent fashion. As part of a 5-year research project on the value of transport externalities, a stated preference (SP) experiment was carried out in order to assess the value of a statistical life for Chilean interurban motorways. Interviewees had to choose among different routes for a hypothetical trip, based on the following attributes: travel time, toll charge and level of risk. The results of our experiment show that people were sensitive to the risk variable, thus "stating" a preference for safer routes. Several models were estimated with linear and non-linear utility specifications, and also incorporating the effects of socio-economic variables in a novel and interesting fashion. We were able to estimate subjective values of time consistent with previous values obtained in the country and reasonably looking values (in comparison to Chilean prices and foreign experience) of a statistical life. The paper discusses the experimental design, data collection and analysis, with emphasis on the role of lexicographic individuals that are a feature of SP studies that has not been carefully explored in the literature. We also present our modelling results and compare our derived values (of time and of a statistical life) with values found previously and/or elsewhere.

[1]  Joel Huber,et al.  Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis☆ , 1991 .

[2]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[3]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  To be, or not to be, that is the question: An empirical study of the WTP for an increased life expectancy at an advanced age , 1996 .

[4]  J. Swanson,et al.  STATED PREFERENCE: TOO MUCH DEFERENCE? , 1995 .

[5]  D A Hensher,et al.  THE TIMING OF CHANGE FOR AUTOMOBILE TRANSACTIONS: COMPETING RISK MULTISPELL SPECIFICATION (CHAPTER 27 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[6]  J De Dios Ortuzar.  MODELLING ROUTE AND MULTIMODAL CHOICES WITH REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE DATA , 1996 .

[7]  Staffan Widlert.  Stated Preference Studies , 1998 .

[8]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Confidence intervals to bound the value of time , 2001 .

[9]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  A MODEL OF EMPLOYEE PARTICIPATION IN TELECOMMUTING PROGRAMS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCE DATA (CHAPTER 10 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[10]  M. W. Jones-Lee.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Safety and the saving of life: The economics of safety and physical risk , 1994 .

[11]  Ted R. Miller,et al.  Variations between Countries in Values of Statistical Life , 2000 .

[12]  Maureen L. Cropper,et al.  Families and the Economics of Risks to Life , 1988 .

[13]  R B Noland,et al.  Perceived risk and modal choice: risk compensation in transportation systems. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Survival versus Consumption , 1984 .

[15]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Application of Willingness-to-Pay Methods to Value Transport Externalities in Less Developed Countries , 2000 .

[16]  A W Evans,et al.  Evaluating public transport and road safety measures. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[18]  Peter O. Barnard,et al.  The Orthogonality Issue in Stated Choice Designs , 1988 .

[19]  M. Hammerton,et al.  THE VALUE OF SAFETY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1985 .

[20]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Rates of time preference and valuations of the duration of life , 1989 .

[21]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  VALUE OF TIME SENSITIVITY TO MODEL SPECIFICATION , 1989 .

[22]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[23]  J. Quiggin.  Generalized expected utility theory , 1992 .

[24]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 2 - The CV/SG "Chained" Approach , 1998 .

[25]  J De Dios Ortuzar,et al.  INTERACTIONS AND INDEPENDENCE IN STATED PREFERENCE MODELLING , 1997 .

[26]  M. Fischer,et al.  Spatial Choices and Processes , 1990 .

[27]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Social Valuation of Road Accident Reductions Using Subjective Perceptions , 2000 .

[28]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator , 1998 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[30]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Comment , 2003 .

[31]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs , 1996 .

[32]  Mark J. Garratt,et al.  Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications , 1994 .

[33]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modelling Transport, 2nd Edition , 1990 .

[34]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications , 1990 .

[35]  W. Arthur.  The economics of risks to life. , 1979, The American economic review.

[36]  E. Quah,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 1972 .

[37]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[38]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Mixed RP/SP models incorporating interaction effects , 2002 .

[39]  Graham Loomes,et al.  THE VALUE OF PREVENTING NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: FINDINGS OF A WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY , 1993 .

[40]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Stated Choice Experiments with Repeated Observations , 1996 .

[41]  K. Sælensminde,et al.  Inconsistent choices in Stated Choice data;Use of the logit scaling approach to handle resulting variance increases , 2001 .

[42]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[43]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Scale and context effects in the valuation of transport safety , 1995 .

[44]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The sensitivity of the valuation of travel time savings to the specification of unobserved effects , 2001 .