Physics-Based Gaussian Process Method for Predicting Average Product Lifetime in Design Stage

The average lifetime or the mean time to failure (MTTF) of a product is an important metric to measure the product reliability. Current methods of evaluating the MTTF are mainly based on statistics or data. They need lifetime testing on a number of products to get the lifetime samples, which are then used to estimate the MTTF. The lifetime testing, however, is expensive in terms of both time and cost. The efficiency is also low because it cannot be effectively incorporated in the early design stage where many physics-based models are available. We propose to predict the MTTF in the design stage by means of a physics-based Gaussian process (GP) method. Since the physics-based models are usually computationally demanding, we face a problem with both big data (on the model input side) and small data (on the model output side). The proposed adaptive supervised training method with the Gaussian process regression can quickly predict the MTTF with a reduced number of physical model calls. The proposed method can enable continually improved design by changing design variables until reliability measures, including the MTTF, are satisfied. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by three examples.

[1]  Qiujing Pan,et al.  An efficient reliability method combining adaptive Support Vector Machine and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2017 .

[2]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Integration of Statistics- and Physics-Based Methods – A Feasibility Study on Accurate System Reliability Prediction , 2018 .

[3]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  System Reliability Analysis With Autocorrelated Kriging Predictions , 2020, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[4]  Xinpeng Wei,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Time- and Space-Dependent Responses With Random Variables , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[5]  Kaichao Zhang,et al.  Reliability analysis for structures with multiple temporal and spatial parameters based on the effective first-crossing point , 2017 .

[6]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[7]  Yan Shi,et al.  A reliability analysis method based on analytical expressions of the first four moments of the surrogate model of the performance function , 2018, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[8]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Robustness Metric for Robust Design Optimization Under Time- and Space-Dependent Uncertainty Through Metamodeling , 2020 .

[9]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  AK-SYSi: an improved adaptive Kriging model for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes by a refined U learning function , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[10]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Efficient Probabilistic Design , 2004, DAC 2002.

[11]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Resilience Assessment Based on Time-Dependent System Reliability Analysis , 2016 .

[12]  Yan Shi,et al.  An adaptive multiple-Kriging-surrogate method for time-dependent reliability analysis , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[13]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Saddlepoint approximation reliability method for quadratic functions in normal variables , 2018 .

[14]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  An efficient time-dependent reliability method , 2019, Structural Safety.

[15]  Wang Chien Ming,et al.  A new active learning method based on the learning function U of the AK-MCS reliability analysis method , 2017 .

[16]  B. Youn,et al.  Complementary Intersection Method for System Reliability Analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) Design Based on Computational Reliability Analysis , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Moment-based evaluation of structural reliability , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  João Cardoso,et al.  Review and application of Artificial Neural Networks models in reliability analysis of steel structures , 2015 .

[20]  Jie Liu,et al.  Time-Variant Reliability Analysis through Response Surface Method , 2017 .

[21]  Xiaoping Du System reliability analysis with saddlepoint approximation , 2010 .

[22]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  A physics-based reliability method for components adopted in new series systems , 2016, 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS).

[23]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability engineering: Old problems and new challenges , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  X. X. Ruan,et al.  A high-precision probabilistic uncertainty propagation method for problems involving multimodal distributions , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[25]  Jie Liu,et al.  An outcrossing rate model and its efficient calculation for time-dependent system reliability analysis , 2017 .

[26]  Junho Song,et al.  System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method , 2009 .

[27]  Xun Chen,et al.  Statistical Inference of Accelerated Life Testing With Dependent Competing Failures Based on Copula Theory , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[28]  Xinpeng Wei,et al.  An improved TRPD method for time-variant reliability analysis , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[29]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  A Single-Loop Kriging Surrogate Modeling for Time-Dependent Reliability Analysis , 2016 .

[30]  Zhen Hu,et al.  First order reliability method for time-variant problems using series expansions , 2015 .

[31]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Integration of the Response Surface Methodology with the Compromise Decision Support Problem in Developing a General Robust Design Procedure , 1994 .

[32]  B. Sudret,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation , 2011, 1104.3667.

[33]  José Alí Moreno,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo reliability evaluation using support vector machine , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Jerald F. Lawless,et al.  Statistical Methods in Reliability , 1983 .

[35]  Herbert Martins Gomes,et al.  Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[37]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[38]  Xin Liu,et al.  An adaptive local range sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using support vector machine and Kriging model , 2017 .

[39]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  Scott Eliason,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation , 1993 .

[41]  Ning Wei,et al.  A single-loop Kriging surrogate model method by considering the first failure instant for time-dependent reliability analysis and safety lifetime analysis , 2020 .

[42]  Hao Zhang,et al.  A Multiwavelet Neural Network‐Based Response Surface Method for Structural Reliability Analysis , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[43]  S. Ross Life testing , 2021, Introduction to Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists.

[44]  Pingfeng Wang,et al.  A Nested Extreme Response Surface Approach for Time-Dependent Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2012 .