Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis

Organizational routines can be conceptualized as generative systems with internal structures and dynamics. In this paper, we propose three different ways that organizational routines can be approached as a unit of analysis. One option is to treat the entire routine as an undifferentiated 'black box'. A second option is to study particular parts of the routine in isolation (e.g. routines as patterns of action). A third option is to study the relationships between these parts and the processes by which the parts change. For some questions, routines can be taken as a unit of analysis without considering their internal structure, but there are many research questions for which it is useful to consider the parts of routines either separately or as they interact. We discuss the importance of understanding the internal structure and dynamics of organizational routines for exploring core organizational phenomena such as stability, change, flexibility, learning and transfer. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

[1]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[2]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Office procedure as practical action: models of work and system design , 1983, TOIS.

[3]  Alessandro Narduzzo.  ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY, COGNITIVE ARTIFACTS AND ROUTINIZATION : SUGGESTIONSFROM A FIELD-STUDY , 1998 .

[4]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[5]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[6]  P. Blau.  The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[7]  W. Thorngate.  "In General" vs. "It Depends": Some Comments of the Gergen-Schlenker Debate , 1976 .

[8]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Review of James G. March, Martin Schulz, and Xueguang Zhou, The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes , 2000 .

[9]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A comparison of artificial and human organizations , 1996 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Organizational Performance Under Information Distortion , 1997 .

[11]  Sherry B. Ortner.  Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties , 1984, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[12]  Andrew C. Boynton,et al.  The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management , 2000 .

[13]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Statistical Process Control , 2018 .

[14]  M. Schulz.  Limits to Bureaucratic Growth: The Density Dependence of Organizational Rule Births. , 1998 .

[15]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[16]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[17]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[18]  Donald F. Roy.  “Banana Time” Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction , 1959 .

[19]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[20]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[21]  Nathalie Lazaric,et al.  How and why routines change: some lessons from the articulation of knowledge with ISO 9002 implementation in the food industry , 2001 .

[22]  M. Feldman.  A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines , 2003 .

[23]  Anne S. Miner.  Structural Evolution Through Idiosyncratic Jobs: The Potential for Unplanned Learning , 1990 .

[24]  B. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action , 1994 .

[25]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry , 1992 .

[26]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[27]  N. Lazaric.  The role of routines, rules and habits in collective learning: some epistemological and ontological considerations , 2000 .

[28]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[29]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Artificial Intelligence within Sociology , 1996 .

[30]  Malu Roldan,et al.  Lexical and Sequential Variety in Organizational Processes: Some Preliminary Findings and Propositions , 1996 .

[31]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[32]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[33]  Anne S. Miner.  Organizational Evolution and the Social Ecology of Jobs , 1991 .

[34]  M. Crozier.  The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[35]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Organizing Work by Adaptation , 1991 .

[36]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Organizing Moves in Software Support Hot Lines , 1992 .

[37]  Aseem Inam,et al.  Institutions, routines, and crises: Post-earthquake housing recovery in Mexico City and Los Angeles , 1999 .

[38]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[39]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[40]  G. Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision , 1971 .

[41]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[42]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[43]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[44]  E. O. Stene.  An Approach to a Science of Administration , 1940, American Political Science Review.

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[47]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[48]  Barbara Czarniawska.  Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity , 1997 .

[49]  P. Mangolte.  Organisational learning and the organisational link: The problem of conflict, political equilibrium and truce , 2000 .

[50]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities , 2001 .

[51]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[52]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Accrual Mobility: Job Mobility in Higher Education through Responsibility Accrual. , 1985 .

[53]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[54]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Scripts in Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[55]  Stable Url.  A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 2007 .

[56]  Alessandro Narduzzo,et al.  Talking about routines in the field: the emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company , 1997 .

[57]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[58]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[59]  J. Douglas,et al.  Understanding everyday life: toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge; , 1971 .

[60]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[61]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[62]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues , 1996 .

[63]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[64]  R. Leidner.  Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life , 1993 .

[65]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Overcoming stickiness: An empirical investigation of the role of the template in the replication of organizational routines , 2004 .

[66]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  The Quality of Standard, Routine and Nonroutine Processes , 2003 .

[67]  Yan Jin,et al.  Simulating Project Work Processes and Organizations: Toward a Micro-Contingency Theory of Organizational Design , 1999 .

[68]  John Burns.  The dynamics of accounting change Inter‐play between new practices, routines, institutions, power and politics , 2000 .

[69]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[70]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[71]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Population-Level Learning and Industry Change , 1999 .

[72]  Minitab.  Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement , 2001 .

[73]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[74]  K. Weick.  Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[75]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Sequential Variety in Work Processes , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[76]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Appropriability and the Challenge of Scope: Banc One Routinizes Replication , 2001 .

[77]  G. Hodgson.  The Darwinian Destiny of An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change , 2003 .

[78]  Bruno Latour,et al.  The Powers of Association , 1984 .

[79]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[80]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[81]  W. H. Deitenbeck.  Introduction to statistical process control. , 1995, Healthcare facilities management series.

[82]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[83]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .