Decidability of Definability

For a fixed infinite structure $\Gamma$ with finite signature tau, we study the following computational problem: input are quantifier-free first-order tau-formulas phi_0,phi_1,...,phi_n that define relations R_0,R_1,\dots,R_n over Gamma. The question is whether the relation R_0 is primitive positive definable from R_1,...,R_n, i.e., definable by a first-order formula that uses only relation symbols for R_1, ..., R_n, equality, conjunctions, and existential quantification (disjunction, negation, and universal quantification are forbidden).We show decidability of this problem for all structures Gamma that have a first-order definition in an ordered homogeneous structure Delta with a finite language whose age is a Ramsey class and determined by finitely many forbidden substructures. Examples for structures Gamma with this property are the order of the rationals, the random graph, the homogeneous universal poset, the random tournament, all homogeneous universal C-relations, and many more. We also obtain decidability of the problem when we replace primitive positive definability by existential positive, or existential definability. Our proof makes use of universal algebraic and model theoretic concepts, Ramsey theory, and a recent characterization of Ramsey classes in topological dynamics.

[1]  Robin Hirsch,et al.  Expressive Power and Complexity in Algebraic Logic , 1997, J. Log. Comput..

[2]  Michael Pinsker,et al.  Minimal functions on the random graph , 2010 .

[3]  Peter Jeavons,et al.  Classifying the Complexity of Constraints Using Finite Algebras , 2005, SIAM J. Comput..

[4]  J. Spencer Ramsey Theory , 1990 .

[5]  V. Pestov,et al.  Fraïssé Limits, Ramsey Theory, and topological dynamics of automorphism groups , 2003 .

[6]  Michael Pinsker,et al.  The reducts of equality up to primitive positive interdefinability , 2010, J. Symb. Log..

[7]  Simon Thomas,et al.  Reducts of the random graph , 1991, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[8]  J. Schiff Wiley‐Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization , 2011 .

[9]  Peter M. Neumann,et al.  Relations related to betweenness : their structure and automorphisms , 1998 .

[10]  Jaroslav Nesetril,et al.  Constraint Satisfaction with Countable Homogeneous Templates , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[11]  James F. Allen Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals , 1983, CACM.

[12]  Chen C. Chang,et al.  Model Theory: Third Edition (Dover Books On Mathematics) By C.C. Chang;H. Jerome Keisler;Mathematics , 1966 .

[13]  Dugald Macpherson,et al.  A survey of homogeneous structures , 2011, Discret. Math..

[14]  Manuel Bodirsky,et al.  Datalog and constraint satisfaction with infinite templates , 2006, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[15]  Wilfrid Hodges,et al.  Model Theory: The existential case , 1993 .

[16]  Manuel Bodirsky,et al.  The complexity of temporal constraint satisfaction problems , 2010, JACM.

[17]  S. Janson,et al.  Wiley‐Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization , 2011 .

[18]  Diana Piguet,et al.  Finite trees are Ramsey under topological embeddings , 2010, 1002.1557.

[19]  Jaroslav Nesetril,et al.  Ramsey Classes and Homogeneous Structures , 2005, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing.

[20]  Michael Pinsker More Sublattices of the Lattice of Local Clones , 2010, Order.

[21]  Keith R. Milliken,et al.  A Ramsey Theorem for Trees , 1979, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[22]  Vojtech Rödl,et al.  The partite construction and ramsey set systems , 1989, Discret. Math..

[23]  Ivo Düntsch,et al.  Relation Algebras and their Application in Temporal and Spatial Reasoning , 2005, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[24]  Ross Willard Testing Expressibility Is Hard , 2010, CP.

[25]  Michael Pinsker,et al.  Reducts of Ramsey structures , 2011, AMS-ASL Joint Special Session.

[26]  Wilfrid Hodges,et al.  A Shorter Model Theory , 1997 .

[27]  Martin Goldstern,et al.  A survey of clones on infinite sets , 2006 .