Using the American Thyroid Association Risk-Stratification System to Refine and Individualize the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Disease-Specific Survival Estimates in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has reclassified up to one third of differentiated thyroid cancer patients into one of the younger prognostic stage groups (<55 years of age at diagnosis, stage I or stage II). This reclassification widens the spectrum of disease in these lower stages without significantly impacting overall disease-specific survival (DSS) for the entire stage group. However, the optimistic DSS estimates in the <55-year-old stage groups may not accurately reflect the prognosis of individual patients with American Thyroid Association (ATA) high-risk features. Therefore, the aim of this study was to integrate the ATA risk classification system into the eighth edition AJCC staging system to refine and individualize DSS estimates for differentiated thyroid cancer patients aged <55 years at diagnosis. METHODS Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center tumor registry, 4881 adult DTC patients aged <55 years at diagnosis receiving initial therapy between 1980 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Using Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center registry coded data, all patients were assigned an eighth edition AJCC stage (I or II), ATA risk of recurrence (low, intermediate, or high), and age group at diagnosis (younger patients defined as ≤45 years old, older patients defined as 45-55 years old). The primary outcome was 10-year DSS. RESULTS A total of 122 (2.5%) disease-related deaths were observed in the cohort of 4881 patients during a median follow-up of 6.6 years. Integration of the AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age groups identified six subgroups with differing outcomes: (i) stage I/ATA low risk, younger and older, 100% DSS; (ii) stage I/ATA intermediate risk, younger and older, 98% DSS; (iii) stage I/ATA high risk, younger, 95% DSS; (iv) stage I/ATA high risk, older, 89% DSS; (v) stage II/ATA high risk, younger, 78% DSS; and (vi) stage II/ATA high risk, older, 61% DSS. CONCLUSIONS Integration of AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age group (i) identifies six subgroups of patients with progressively worse DSS as AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age increases, and (ii) provides a more individualized estimate of DSS, especially in ATA high-risk patients.

[1]  S. Mandel,et al.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. , 2009, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[2]  Jee Soo Kim,et al.  Prognostic value of the eighth edition AJCC TNM classification for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. , 2017, Oral oncology.

[3]  Su-jin Kim,et al.  Optimal Cutoff Age for Predicting Mortality Associated with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Tae Yong Kim,et al.  Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[5]  B. Lang,et al.  Staging Systems for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Review and Comparison , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Samuel L. Oyer,et al.  Reevaluating the Prognostic Significance of Age in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  E. Pribitkin,et al.  Is above age 45 appropriate for upstaging well-differentiated papillary thyroid cancer? , 2013, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[8]  J. Shah,et al.  Survival from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What Has Age Got to Do with It? , 2015, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[9]  T. Klonisch,et al.  Prognostic nomograms to predict oncological outcome of thyroid cancers. , 2013, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  J. Jonklaas,et al.  The impact of age and gender on papillary thyroid cancer survival. , 2012, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  M. Ranney,et al.  Beyond the bedside: Clinicians as guardians of public health, medicine and science , 2020, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

[12]  S. Roman,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Patient Age and Cancer-Specific Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Rethinking Current Staging Systems. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Frederick L. Greene,et al.  The Eighth Edition of TNM: Implications for the Surgical Oncologist , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  S. Roman,et al.  Extrathyroidal Extension Is Associated with Compromised Survival in Patients with Thyroid Cancer. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[15]  D. Chang,et al.  A critical analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for differentiated thyroid carcinoma in young patients on the basis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. , 2012, Surgery.

[16]  A. Stojadinovic,et al.  Impact of degree of extrathyroidal extension of disease on papillary thyroid cancer outcome. , 2014, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[17]  Nancy D Perrier,et al.  Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (Eighth Edition): What Changed and Why? , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[18]  Z. Hall Cancer , 1906, The Hospital.

[19]  P. Rosário Eighth edition of AJCC staging for differentiated thyroid cancer: Is stage I appropriate for T4/N1b patients aged 45–55 years? , 2017, Endocrine.

[20]  J. Shah,et al.  Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  C. Benbassat,et al.  Reassessment of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients Using the Eighth TNM/AJCC Classification System: A Comparative Study. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[22]  J. Shah,et al.  An International Multi-Institutional Validation of Age 55 Years as a Cutoff for Risk Stratification in the AJCC/UICC Staging System for Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. , 2016, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[23]  J. Shah,et al.  Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system. , 2010, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[24]  S. Roman,et al.  Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[25]  Nancy D Perrier,et al.  Differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  E. Kaplan,et al.  A study of recurrence and death from papillary thyroid cancer with 27 years of median follow-up. , 2013, Surgery.