Cellular-V2X Communications With Weighted-Power-Based Mode Selection

Cellular-assisted vehicular-to-everything (C-V2X) communication is a promising technology to enhance the road safety and support various infortainment services in future vehicular networks. However, the integration of vehicular communication with the conventional cellular network faces many new design challenges, as vehicles typically use different spectrum band (5.9 GHz) from the cellular systems, and they usually follow different distributions and have more stringent reliability and latency requirements, as compared with the conventional cellular users. In this paper, we study C-V2X communication where the V2X resource pool is managed by the eNodeBs and reused in different cells, with the cells divided according to the Voronoi tessellation of the eNodeBs. We investigate three connection modes for a vehicle to receive safety/entertainment information, namely, from its associated eNodeB, from a neighboring vehicle on the same road, or from a neighboring vehicle on a different road. We propose a weighted-power-based mode selection scheme which offers great flexibility to balance the load of the cellular network and improve the coverage probability. By using stochastic geometry, we derive the analytical expressions for the mode selection and coverage probabilities, which are validated by extensive simulations. Furthermore, by optimizing the weighting factors, the proposed mode selection scheme leads to significantly better performance than the conventional distance-based and maximum-power-based mode selection schemes.

[1]  Wuyang Zhou,et al.  The Ginibre Point Process as a Model for Wireless Networks With Repulsion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  François Baccelli,et al.  Poisson Cox Point Processes for Vehicular Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Erik Steinmetz,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications with Urban Intersection Path Loss Models , 2016, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[4]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[5]  François Baccelli,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Coverage in Cellular Networks Leveraging Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Tomasz Schreiber,et al.  Limit theorems for the typical poisson-voronoi cell and the crofton cell with a large inradius , 2005, math/0507463.

[7]  Tae-Jin Lee,et al.  Coordinated Multichannel MAC Protocol for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  User Point Processes in Cellular Networks , 2016, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[9]  Bin Liao,et al.  Spectrum and Power Allocation for Vehicular Networks with Diverse Latency Requirements , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[10]  M. Tanemura Statistical Distributions of Poisson Voronoi Cells in Two and Three Dimensions , 2003 .

[11]  Arumugam Nallanathan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry Modeling of Cellular V2X Communication on Shared Uplink Channels , 2018, ArXiv.

[12]  Zachary MacHardy,et al.  V2X Access Technologies: Regulation, Research, and Remaining Challenges , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  On Stochastic Geometry Modeling of Cellular Uplink Transmission With Truncated Channel Inversion Power Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Success Probability and Area Spectral Efficiency of a VANET Modeled as a Cox Process , 2018, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[15]  Chun-Hung Liu,et al.  Random cell association and void probability in poisson-distributed cellular networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[16]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Primer on Cellular Network Analysis Using Stochastic Geometry , 2016, ArXiv.

[17]  Li Li,et al.  Performance Evaluation of VeMAC Supporting Safety Applications in Vehicular Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[18]  Javier Gozalvez,et al.  LTE-V for Sidelink 5G V2X Vehicular Communications: A New 5G Technology for Short-Range Vehicle-to-Everything Communications , 2017, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[19]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Mode Selection and Power Control for Underlay D2D Communication in Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[20]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Mean Interference in Hard-Core Wireless Networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[21]  Paul Mühlethaler,et al.  Random Linear Multihop Relaying in a General Field of Interferers Using Spatial Aloha , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Laurent Decreusefond,et al.  How to Dimension 5G Network When Users Are Distributed on Roads Modeled by Poisson Line Process , 2018, ArXiv.

[23]  Christian Poellabauer,et al.  A Stochastic Geometry Approach to the Modeling of DSRC for Vehicular Safety Communication , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Behrooz Makki,et al.  Stochastic Geometry Modeling and Analysis of Finite Millimeter Wave Wireless Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[25]  Sayantan Guha,et al.  Cellular-Assisted Vehicular Communications: A Stochastic Geometric Approach , 2016 .

[26]  Harpreet S. Dhillon,et al.  Coverage Analysis of a Vehicular Network Modeled as Cox Process Driven by Poisson Line Process , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[27]  M. Win,et al.  Intervehicle Communication: Cox-Fox Modeling , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.