Reaching for the Star: Tale of a Monad in Coq
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Robert Atkey,et al. Dijkstra monads for all , 2019, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[2] Lars Birkedal,et al. Hoare type theory, polymorphism and separation1 , 2008, Journal of Functional Programming.
[3] Yann Régis-Gianas,et al. FreeSpec: specifying, verifying, and executing impure computations in Coq , 2020, CPP.
[4] Santiago Zanella Béguelin,et al. Dependent types and multi-monadic effects in F , 2016, POPL.
[5] ARTHUR CHARGUÉRAUD,et al. Separation logic for sequential programs (functional pearl) , 2020, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[6] Kenji Maillard,et al. Principles of Program Verification for Arbitrary Monadic Effects. (Principes de la Vérification de Programmes à Effets Monadiques Arbitraires) , 2019 .
[7] Edwin Brady. Resource-Dependent Algebraic Effects , 2014, Trends in Functional Programming.
[8] Nikhil Swamy,et al. Recalling a witness: foundations and applications of monotonic state , 2017, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[9] Edwin Brady,et al. Programming and reasoning with algebraic effects and dependent types , 2013, ICFP.
[10] Lars Birkedal,et al. Iris from the ground up: A modular foundation for higher-order concurrent separation logic , 2018, Journal of Functional Programming.
[11] Jean-Christophe Filliâtre,et al. Verification of non-functional programs using interpretations in type theory , 2003, J. Funct. Program..
[12] Wouter Swierstra. A Hoare Logic for the State Monad , 2009, TPHOLs.
[13] Yann Régis-Gianas,et al. Modular Verification of Programs with Effects and Effect Handlers in Coq , 2018, FM.
[14] Arthur Charguéraud. Program verification through characteristic formulae , 2010, ICFP '10.
[15] Chung-Kil Hur,et al. Interaction trees: representing recursive and impure programs in Coq , 2020, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[16] Robert Atkey,et al. Parameterised notions of computation , 2006, J. Funct. Program..
[17] WOUTER SWIERSTRA,et al. A predicate transformer semantics for effects (functional pearl) , 2019, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[18] J. G. Morrisett,et al. Ynot: dependent types for imperative programs , 2008, ICFP.
[19] Michael Hicks,et al. Polymonadic Programming , 2014, MSFP.
[20] David A. Basin,et al. A Monad-Based Modeling and Verification Toolbox with Application to Security Protocols , 2007, TPHOLs.
[21] Ralf Hinze,et al. Just do it: simple monadic equational reasoning , 2011, ICFP.
[22] Gordon D. Plotkin,et al. Adequacy for Algebraic Effects , 2001, FoSSaCS.
[23] Gudmund Grov,et al. An Essence of SSReflect , 2012, AISC/MKM/Calculemus.
[24] Aaron Stump. Programming Language Foundations , 2013 .
[25] Chapter 25 Reasoning About Effects : Seeing the Wood Through the Trees , 2008 .
[26] John C. Reynolds,et al. Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures , 2002, Proceedings 17th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.
[27] Simon Peyton Jones,et al. Tackling the Awkward Squad: monadic input/output, concurrency, exceptions, and foreign-language calls in Haskell , 2005 .
[28] Lauretta O. Osho,et al. Axiomatic Basis for Computer Programming , 2013 .
[29] Adam Chlipala,et al. The End of History? Using a Proof Assistant to Replace Language Design with Library Design , 2017, SNAPL.
[30] Nikhil Swamy,et al. SteelCore: an extensible concurrent separation logic for effectful dependently typed programs , 2020, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[31] Nikhil Swamy,et al. Dijkstra monads for free , 2016, POPL.
[32] Chung-Kil Hur,et al. Strongly Typed Term Representations in Coq , 2011, Journal of Automated Reasoning.
[33] Joseph Tassarotti,et al. MoSeL: a general, extensible modal framework for interactive proofs in separation logic , 2018, Proc. ACM Program. Lang..
[34] Reynald Affeldt,et al. A Hierarchy of Monadic Effects for Program Verification Using Equational Reasoning , 2019, MPC.
[35] Xavier Leroy,et al. Formal verification of a realistic compiler , 2009, CACM.