Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.

When monitoring a rapid serial visual presentation at 100 ms per item for 2 targets among distractors, viewers have difficulty reporting the 2nd target (T2) when it appears 200-500 ms after the onset of the 1st letter target (T1): an attentional blink (AB; M. M. Chun & M. C. Potter, 1995b; J. E. Raymond, K. L. Shapiro, & K. M. Arnell, 1992). Does the same deficit occur with auditory search? The authors compared search for auditory, visual, and cross-modal targets in 2 tasks: (a) identifying 2 target letters among digits (Experiments 1-3 and 5) or digits among letters (Experiment 6), and (b) identifying 1 digit among letters and deciding whether an X occurred among the subsequent letters (Experiment 4). In the experiments using the 1st task, the standard AB was found only when both targets were visual. In the 2nd task, with a change in selective set from T1 to T2, a task-switching deficit was obtained regardless of target modality.

[1]  Steven M. J. Hunt,et al.  MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences , 1994 .

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D. Meyer,et al.  Attention and Performance XIV , 1973 .

[4]  J. Duncan.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[5]  V. Bruce.  Unsolved mysteries of the mind : tutorial essays in cognition , 1998 .

[6]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task , 1997, Nature.

[7]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The attentional blink , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  V. Lollo,et al.  Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Chun.  Temporal binding errors are redistributed by the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[12]  D. Scarborough.  Memory for brief visual displays of symbols , 1972 .

[13]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[14]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[15]  H. Pashler.  Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at the Same Time , 1992 .

[16]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  S. Monsell.  Control of mental processes , 2021, Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind.

[18]  S. McAdams,et al.  Auditory Cognition. (Book Reviews: Thinking in Sound. The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition.) , 1993 .

[19]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[21]  H. Pashler.  Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  N. Kanwisher.  Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[23]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? , 1994 .

[24]  N. Meiran.  Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[25]  D. Deutsch.  Auditory memory. , 1975, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  V. Lollo,et al.  Low-level masking in the attentional blink , 1997 .

[27]  Mary C. Poti ' Er.  Very short-term conceptual memory , 1993 .

[28]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. Driver,et al.  Priming from the Attentional Blink: A Failure to Extract Visual Tokens but Not Visual Types , 1997 .

[31]  H. Pashler.  Overlapping Mental Operations in Serial Performance with Preview , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  E. Vogel,et al.  Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.

[33]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[34]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[35]  K. Arnell,et al.  The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. , 1999 .

[36]  H. Egeth,et al.  Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Karen M. Arnell,et al.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.