Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions

The paper presents the results of an energy and environmental assessment of a set of retrofit actions implemented in the framework of the EU Project "BRITA in PuBs" (Bringing Retrofit Innovation to Application in Public Buildings - no: TREN/04/FP6EN/S07.31038/503135). Outcomes arise from a life cycle approach focused on the following issues: (i) construction materials and components used during retrofits; (ii) main components of conventional and renewable energy systems; (iii) impacts related to the building construction, for the different elements and the whole building. The results are presented according to the data format of the Environmental Product Declaration. Synthetic indices, as energy and GWP payback times, and energy return ratio, are defined to better describe the energy and environmental performances of the actions. The project highlights the role of the life cycle approach for selecting the most effective options during the design and implementation of retrofit actions.

[1]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[2]  Valerio Lo Brano,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector: sensitivity analysis, energy and environmental balances , 2005 .

[3]  Daniel R. Rousse,et al.  Energy Costs of Energy Savings in Buildings: A Review , 2012 .

[4]  Nannan Wang,et al.  Lifecycle assessment for sustainable design options of a commercial building in Shanghai , 2010 .

[5]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[6]  T. Merrigan.  On the Path to Zero Energy Homes , 2001 .

[7]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Building energy performance : A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board , 2008 .

[8]  Valerio Lo Brano,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector , 2005 .

[9]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[10]  Norbert Reich,et al.  Product safety and product liability — An analysis of the EEC Council Directive of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products , 1986 .

[11]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building , 2006 .

[12]  H. Althaus,et al.  Benchmarks for sustainable construction: A contribution to develop a standard , 2005 .

[13]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life cycle assessment‐driven selection of industrial ecology strategies , 2010, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[14]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[15]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[16]  A. Uihlein,et al.  Environmental Improvement Potentials of Residential Buildings (IMPRO-Building) , 2008 .

[17]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  The selection of effective retrofit scenarios for panel houses in urban neighborhoods based on expected energy savings and increase in market value: The Vilnius case , 2008 .