Toward a More Inclusive Construct of Native Chinese Speaker L2 Written Error Gravity

Toward a More Inclusive Construct of Native Chinese Speaker L2 Written Error Gravity Steven K. Holland Department of Linguistics and English Language Master of Arts The purpose of this study is to determine two types of error gravity in a corpus of texts written by native Chinese learners of English (ELLs)—one that enriches the traditional construct of gravity found in error gravity research by including error frequency, or how often an error occurs in a text relative to others, as an intervening variable, and one that applies the new error gravity data in a practical way to help establish salient grammatical focal points for written corrective feedback (WCF). Previous error gravity research has suggested that the amount of irritation caused by error is determined by the extent to which an utterance departs from “nativelike” speech. However, because these studies often neglect the role of frequency in determining gravity—relying on isolated sentences, pre-determined errors, and manipulated texts to define it—a more complete view of error gravity is needed. Forty-eight native English speakers without ESL teaching experience and 10 experienced ESL teachers evaluated a set of 18 timed, 30minute essays written by high intermediate to advanced native-Chinese ELLs. Errors were identified, verified, tagged, and classified by the level of irritation they produced. Results show the most serious errors included count/non-count (C/NC), insert verb (INSERT V), omit verb (OMIT V), and subject-verb agreement (SV). The most frequent error type was word choice (WC), followed by singular/plural (S/PL), awkward (AWK), and word form (WF). When combined, singular/plural (S/PL), word form (WF), word choice (WC), and awkward (AWK) errors were found to be the most critical. These findings support Burt and Kiparsky’s (1972) global/local error distinction in which global errors, or those lexical, grammatical and syntactic errors that affect the overall organization or meaning of the sentence (Burt, 1975) are deemed more grievous than local ones, which affect only “single elements (constituents)” (Burt, 1975, p. 57). Implications are discussed in terms of future research and possible uses in the Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback classroom.

[1]  Sara Cushing Weigle,et al.  Effects of Task and Rater Background on the Evaluation of ESL Student Writing: A Pilot Study. , 2003 .

[2]  Sean Mahoney.  Exploring Gaps in Teacher and Student EFL Error Evaluation , 2011 .

[3]  P. Matsuda.  The Myth of Linguistic Homogeneity in U.S. College Composition. , 2006 .

[4]  S. P. Corder.  IDIOSYNCRATIC DIALECTS AND ERROR ANALYSIS , 1971 .

[5]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[6]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Processing Time, Accent, and Comprehensibility in the Perception of Native and Foreign-Accented Speech , 1995, Language and speech.

[7]  Chryssoula Lascaratou,et al.  Competing criteria for error gravity , 1982 .

[8]  Benjamin A. Rifkin,et al.  Error Gravity: A Critical Review of Research Design. , 1995 .

[9]  Norman W. Evans,et al.  Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy , 2010 .

[10]  Joann Rishel Kozyrev.  Writing Clearly: An Editing Guide , 1993 .

[11]  Elena McCretton,et al.  ERROR GRAVITY AND ERROR HIERARCHIES , 1993 .

[12]  Tony Silva,et al.  Broadening the Perspective of Mainstream Composition Studies , 1997 .

[13]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of error: The effects of first language and experience , 2006 .

[14]  Ruth Spack,et al.  The Rhetorical Construction of Multilingual Students. , 1997 .

[15]  Roberta J. Vann,et al.  Error Gravity: A Study of Faculty Opinion of ESL Errors , 1984 .

[16]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  Linguistic variation and change , 1992 .

[17]  Gerhard Falk,et al.  Stigma: How We Treat Outsiders , 2001 .

[18]  Linda Gaylord Piazza.  French Tolerance for Grammatical Errors Made by Americans , 1980 .

[19]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  The Gooficon: A Repair Manual for English , 1974 .

[20]  Karen Earline Schairer.  Native Speaker Reaction to Non-Native Speech. , 1992 .

[21]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[22]  Robert L. Politzer,et al.  Errors of English Speakers of German As Perceived and Evaluated by German Natives , 1978 .

[23]  Alice Y. W. Chan,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Written Errors: Investigation into the Written Errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL Learners. , 2010 .

[24]  David Johnson,et al.  Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam , 2012 .

[25]  Michael Janopoulos.  University Faculty Tolerance of NS and NNS Writing Errors: A Comparison. , 1992 .

[26]  Akiko Okamura.  Teachers' and Nonteachers' Perception of Elementary Learners' Spoken Japanese. , 1995 .

[27]  Eirlys E. Davies,et al.  Error evaluation: the importance of viewpoint , 1983 .

[28]  Soon Yeun Lee,et al.  The Efficacy of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback on Intermediate-high ESL Learners' Writing Accuracy , 2009 .

[29]  Native Speaker Judgment and the Evaluation of Errors in German , 1982 .

[30]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations , 2009 .

[31]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction , 1994 .

[32]  Richard E Petty,et al.  Contextual moderation of racial bias: the impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Kenneth Chastain.  Native Speaker Reaction to Instructor-Identified Student Second-Language Errors. , 1980 .

[34]  Tony Silva.  On the Ethical Treatment of ESL Writers. , 1997 .

[35]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[36]  Ryuko Kubota.  Discursive Construction of the Images of U.S. Classrooms. , 2001 .

[37]  Carl James.  Linguistic Measures for Error Gravity. , 1974 .

[38]  T. McNamara.  Measuring Second Language Performance , 1996 .

[39]  Jeannette Ludwig.  Native‐Speaker Judgments of Second‐Language Learners' Efforts at Communication: A Review , 1982 .

[40]  E. Goffman.  Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[41]  Machiko Tomiyana,et al.  Grammatical Errors Communication Breakdown. , 1980 .

[42]  Kathleen Y. Ensz.  French Attitudes toward Typical Speech Errors of American Speakers of French. , 1982 .

[43]  Marina K. Burt.  Error Analysis in the Adult EFL Classroom. , 1975 .

[44]  A. Khalil.  Communicative Error Evaluation: Native Speakers' Evaluation and Interpretation of Written Errors of Arab EFL Learners , 1985 .

[45]  Felicia Roberts,et al.  Evaluating ESL: Making sense of university professors’ responses to second language writing , 2008 .

[46]  Larry Beason,et al.  Ethos and Error: How Business People React to Errors , 2001, College Composition & Communication.

[47]  Michael Janopoulos.  Writing across the curriculum, writing proficiency exams, and the NNS college student , 1995 .

[48]  S. Gynan.  Comprehension, Irritation and Error Hierarchies , 1985 .

[49]  K. James Hartshorn,et al.  Written Corrective Feedback: Practitioners' Perspectives. , 2010 .

[50]  T. Santos.  Professors' Reactions to the Academic Writing of Nonnative-Speaking Students. , 1988 .

[51]  Yuri Hosoda,et al.  Repair and Relevance of Differential Language Expertise in Second Language Conversations , 2006 .

[52]  Norman W. Evans,et al.  The efficacy of dynamic written corrective feedback for university-matriculated ESL learners , 2011 .

[53]  Libuše Dušková,et al.  ON SOURCES OF ERRORS IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING , 1969 .

[54]  J. Raaijmakers.  A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy". , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[55]  Birgit Henriksen,et al.  NATIVE SPEAKER REACTIONS TO LEARNERS' SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE 1 , 1980 .

[56]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity , 1998 .

[57]  Carl James,et al.  Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis , 1998 .

[58]  Kenneth D. Chastain,et al.  Native Speaker Evaluation of Student Composition Errors. , 1981 .