Computer-aided analysis of star shot films for high-accuracy radiation therapy treatment units

As mechanical stability of radiation therapy treatment devices has gone beyond sub-millimeter levels, there is a rising demand for simple yet highly accurate measurement techniques to support the routine quality control of these devices. A combination of using high-resolution radiosensitive film and computer-aided analysis could provide an answer. One generally known technique is the acquisition of star shot films to determine the mechanical stability of rotations of gantries and the therapeutic beam. With computer-aided analysis, mechanical performance can be quantified as a radiation isocenter radius size. In this work, computer-aided analysis of star shot film is further refined by applying an analytical solution for the smallest intersecting circle problem, in contrast to the gradient optimization approaches used until today. An algorithm is presented and subjected to a performance test using two different types of radiosensitive film, the Kodak EDR2 radiographic film and the ISP EBT2 radiochromic film. Artificial star shots with a priori known radiation isocenter size are used to determine the systematic errors introduced by the digitization of the film and the computer analysis. The estimated uncertainty on the isocenter size measurement with the presented technique was 0.04 mm (2σ) and 0.06 mm (2σ) for radiographic and radiochromic films, respectively. As an application of the technique, a study was conducted to compare the mechanical stability of O-ring gantry systems with C-arm-based gantries. In total ten systems of five different institutions were included in this study and star shots were acquired for gantry, collimator, ring, couch rotations and gantry wobble. It was not possible to draw general conclusions about differences in mechanical performance between O-ring and C-arm gantry systems, mainly due to differences in the beam-MLC alignment procedure accuracy. Nevertheless, the best performing O-ring system in this study, a BrainLab/MHI Vero system, and the best performing C-arm system, a Varian Truebeam system, showed comparable mechanical performance: gantry isocenter radius of 0.12 and 0.09 mm, respectively, ring/couch rotation of below 0.10 mm for both systems and a wobble of 0.06 and 0.18 mm, respectively. The methodology described in this work can be used to monitor mechanical performance constancy of high-accuracy treatment devices, with means available in a clinical radiation therapy environment.

[1]  T R Mackie,et al.  Quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R P Müller,et al.  On isocentre adjustment and quality control in linear accelerator based radiosurgery with circular collimators and room lasers. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Helmar Bergmann,et al.  Introducing a system for automated control of rotation axes, collimator and laser adjustment for a medical linear accelerator. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Piotr Zygmanski,et al.  An MLC-based linac QA procedure for the characterization of radiation isocenter and room lasers' position. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  I A Brezovich,et al.  Quality assurance system to correct for errors arising from couch rotation in linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  O Jäkel,et al.  A method for determining the alignment accuracy of the treatment table axis at an isocentric irradiation facility , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Oliver Jäkel,et al.  Technical Note: Homogeneity of Gafchromic® EBT2 film , 2010 .

[8]  K. Winston,et al.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator , 1988 .

[9]  Thierry Gevaert,et al.  Dosimetric assessment of static and helical TomoTherapy in the clinical implementation of breast cancer treatments. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Z Li,et al.  Minimization of target positioning error in accelerator-based radiosurgery. , 1995, Medical physics.

[11]  E S Sternick,et al.  The measurement of linear accelerator isocenter motion using a three-micrometer device and an adjustable pointer. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Masahiro Hiraoka,et al.  Development of a four-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy system with a gimbaled X-ray head. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Daniel A Low,et al.  Linac mechanic QA using a cylindrical phantom , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A González,et al.  A procedure to determine the radiation isocenter size in a linear accelerator. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  Piotr Skworcow,et al.  A new approach to quantify the mechanical and radiation isocentres of radiotherapy treatment machine gantries. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  M. Herk Errors and margins in radiotherapy. , 2004 .

[17]  L Dong,et al.  Verification of radiosurgery target point alignment with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). , 1997, Medical physics.

[18]  Lei Xing,et al.  Initial application of a geometric QA tool for integrated MV and kV imaging systems on three image guided radiotherapy systems. , 2011, Medical physics.

[19]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Benchmarking beam alignment for a clinical helical tomotherapy device. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Thierry Gevaert,et al.  Geometric accuracy of a novel gimbals based radiation therapy tumor tracking system. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.