Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity

αβ T lymphocytes are able to detect even a single peptide–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell. This is despite clear evidence, at least with CD4+ T cells, that monomeric ligands are not stimulatory. In an effort to understand how this remarkable sensitivity is achieved, we constructed soluble peptide–MHC heterodimers in which one peptide is an agonist and the other is one of the large number of endogenous peptide–MHCs displayed by presenting cells. We found that some specific combinations of these heterodimers can stimulate specific T cells in a CD4-dependent manner. This activation is severely impaired if the CD4-binding site on the agonist ligand is ablated, but the same mutation on an endogenous ligand has no effect. These data correlate well with analyses of lipid bilayers and cells presenting these ligands, and indicate that the basic unit of helper T cell activation is a heterodimer of agonist peptide– and endogenous peptide–MHC complexes, stabilized by CD4.

[1]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer , 2001, Cell.

[2]  J. Parnes,et al.  Role of CD4 and CD8 in T cell activation and differentiation. , 1993, Advances in immunology.

[3]  D. Aivazian,et al.  Phosphorylation of T cell receptor ζ is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  Z Reich,et al.  Ligand recognition by alpha beta T cell receptors. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[5]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  LIGAND RECOGNITION BY T CELL RECEPTORS , 1998 .

[6]  J. Cochran,et al.  The relationship of MHC-peptide binding and T cell activation probed using chemically defined MHC class II oligomers. , 2000, Immunity.

[7]  R. Germain,et al.  Self-recognition promotes the foreign antigen sensitivity of naive T lymphocytes , 2002, Nature.

[8]  Jianzhu Chen,et al.  Soluble peptide–MHC monomers cause activation of CD8+ T cells through transfer of the peptide to T cell MHC molecules , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Sprent,et al.  The peptide ligands mediating positive selection in the thymus control T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation in the periphery. , 1999, Immunity.

[10]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[11]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naïve or memory T cells. , 1997, Science.

[12]  A. Trautmann,et al.  CD8 expression allows T cell signaling by monomeric peptide-MHC complexes. , 1998, Immunity.

[13]  M. Davis,et al.  Expression of a class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterodimer in a lipid-linked form with enhanced peptide/soluble MHC complex formation at low pH , 1991, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[15]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  The nature of major histocompatibility complex recognition by γδ T cells , 1994, Cell.

[16]  J. Altman,et al.  Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands [corrected]. , 1998, Immunity.

[17]  H. Rammensee,et al.  Natural ligand motifs of H-2E molecules are allele specific and illustrate homology to HLA-DR molecules. , 1995, International immunology.

[18]  J. Guardiola,et al.  Identification of a CD4 binding site on the β2 domain of HLA-DR molecules , 1992, Nature.

[19]  C. Sousa,et al.  Self peptide/MHC class I complexes have a negligible effect on the response of some CD8+ T cells to foreign antigen , 2002, European journal of immunology.

[20]  R. Germain,et al.  MHC class II interaction with CD4 mediated by a region analogous to the MHC class I binding site for CD8 , 1992, Nature.

[21]  J. Freed,et al.  Comparison of peptides bound to spleen and thymus class II , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  A. Chakraborty,et al.  Correlation of a dynamic model for immunological synapse formation with effector functions: two pathways to synapse formation. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[23]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[24]  R. Tsien.  Fluorescent probes of cell signaling. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[26]  D. Fruman,et al.  Phosphoinositide 3-kinase: diverse roles in immune cell activation. , 2004, Annual review of immunology.

[27]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[29]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  T cell receptor antagonism interferes with MHC clustering and integrin patterning during immunological synapse formation , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  D. Fremont,et al.  Structures of an MHC Class II Molecule with Covalently Bound Single Peptides , 1996, Science.