Optimal the tilt angles for photovoltaic modules using PSO method with nonlinear time-varying evolution

A particle-swarm optimization method with nonlinear time-varying evolution (PSO–NTVE) is employed in determining the tilt angle of photovoltaic (PV) modules in Taiwan. The objective is to maximize the output electrical energy of the modules. In this study, seven Taiwanese cities were selected for analysis. First, the sun's position at any time and location was predicted by the mathematical procedure of Julian dating, and then the solar irradiation was obtained at each site under a clear sky. By combining the temperature effect, the PSO–NTVE method is adopted to calculate the optimal tilt angles for fixed south-facing PV modules. In this method, the parameters are determined by using matrix experiments with an orthogonal array, in which a minimal number of experiments have an effect that approximates the full factorial experiments. Statistical error analysis was performed to compare the results between the four PSO methods and experimental results. Hengchun city in which the minimum total error value of 6.12% the reasons for the weather more stability and less building shade. A comparison of the measurement results in electrical energy between the four PSO methods and the PV modules set a six tilt angles. Obviously four types of PSO methods simulation of electrical energy value from 231.12 kWh/m2 for Taipei to 233.81 kWh/m2 for Hengchun greater than the measurement values from 224.71 kWh/m2 for Taichung to 228.47 kWh/m2 for Hengchun by PV module which is due to instability caused by climate change. Finally, the results show that the annual optimal angle for the Taipei area is 18.16°; for Taichung, 17.3°; for Tainan, 16.15°; for Kaosiung, 15.79°; for Hengchung, 15.17°; for Hualian, 17.16°; and for Taitung, 15.94°. It is evident that the authorized Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) recommends that tilt angle of 23.5° was not an appropriate use of Taiwan's seven cities. PV modules with the installation of the tilt angle should be adjusted in different locations.

[1]  Amitava Chatterjee,et al.  Nonlinear inertia weight variation for dynamic adaptation in particle swarm optimization , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  John Casazza,et al.  The Evolution of Electric Power Transmission Under Deregulation: Selected Readings , 2000 .

[3]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[4]  Chia-Nan Ko,et al.  An orthogonal-array-based particle swarm optimizer with nonlinear time-varying evolution , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  Zwe-Lee Gaing,et al.  A particle swarm optimization approach for optimum design of PID controller in AVR system , 2004 .

[6]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Empirical study of particle swarm optimization , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[7]  José Neves,et al.  The fully informed particle swarm: simpler, maybe better , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[8]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[9]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  Comparison between Genetic Algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.

[10]  Donald E. Grierson,et al.  Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms , 2005, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[11]  Yaow-Ming Chen,et al.  Calculation of the optimum installation angle for fixed solar-cell panels based on the genetic algorithm and the Simulated-annealing method , 2005 .

[12]  H.M.S. Hussein,et al.  Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules at different tilt angles and orientations , 2004 .

[13]  R. Tang,et al.  Optimal tilt-angles for solar collectors used in China , 2004 .

[14]  M. Kacira,et al.  Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey , 2004 .

[15]  Chang Ying-Pin,et al.  Effects of the Solar Module Installing Angles on the Output Power , 2007, 2007 8th International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments.

[16]  Yue Shi,et al.  A modified particle swarm optimizer , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360).

[17]  Yoshikazu Fukuyama,et al.  A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment , 2000 .

[18]  Saman K. Halgamuge,et al.  Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[19]  D.H. Werner,et al.  Particle swarm optimization versus genetic algorithms for phased array synthesis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[20]  S.L. Ho,et al.  A particle swarm optimization method with enhanced global search ability for design optimizations of electromagnetic devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.