Modeling macro-R&D production frontier performance: an application to Chinese province-level R&D

This paper proposes a novel methodological framework for effectively measuring the production frontier performance (PFP) of macro-scale (regional or national) R&D activities themselves associated with two improved models: a non-radial data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and a nonradial Malmquist index. In particular, the framework can provide multidimensional information to benchmark various R&D efficiency indexes (i.e., technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency) as well as the total factor R&D productivity change (determined by three components: “catch-up” of R&D efficiency, “frontier shift” of R&D technology as well as “exploitation” of R&D scale economics effect) at a comparable production frontier. It can be used to not only investigate the potential and sustainable capacity of innovation but also screen and finance R&D projects at the regional or national level. We have applied the framework to a province-level panel dataset on R&D activities of 30 selected Chinese provinces.

[1]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators , 1997, Scientometrics.

[4]  J. Faber.  Innovation capabilities of European nations Cross-national analyses of patents and sales of produc , 2004 .

[5]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring Productive Efficiency: An Application to Illinois Strip Mines , 1984 .

[6]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency , 2004, Scientometrics.

[7]  M. Fritsch,et al.  What Determines the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems? , 2007 .

[8]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Comparing regional innovative capacities of PR China based on data analysis of the national patents , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Joaquim Borges Gouveia,et al.  Scientific productivity paradox: The case of China's S&T system , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology , 2008, Scientometrics.

[11]  C. Lovell,et al.  A generalized Malmquist productivity index , 1999 .

[12]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[14]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[15]  John Maleyeff,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: DEA with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2005 .

[16]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[18]  E. Wang.  R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach , 2007 .

[19]  Wei Meng,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China , 2006, Scientometrics.

[20]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[21]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[22]  P. Leung,et al.  Productive Efficiency of the Swine Industry in Hawaii: Stochastic Frontier vs. Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[23]  A. Schubert,et al.  Scientometric Indicators: A 32-Century Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact , 1985 .

[24]  Daniel K. N. Johnson.  The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use , 2002 .