Affinity and specificity of motif-based protein-protein interactions.

It is becoming increasingly clear that eukaryotic cell physiology is largely controlled by protein-protein interactions involving disordered protein regions, which usually interact with globular domains in a coupled binding and folding reaction. Several protein recognition domains are part of large families where members can interact with similar peptide ligands. Because of this, much research has been devoted to understanding how specificity can be achieved. A combination of interface complementarity, interactions outside of the core binding site, avidity from multidomain architecture and spatial and temporal regulation of expression resolves the conundrum. Here, we review recent advances in molecular aspects of affinity and specificity in such protein-protein interactions.

[1]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The calcineurin signaling network evolves via conserved kinase‐phosphatase modules that transcend substrate identity (586.3) , 2014, Molecular cell.

[2]  Jason W Locasale,et al.  Allovalency revisited: an analysis of multisite phosphorylation and substrate rebinding. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  P. Güntert,et al.  Proteome‐wide analysis of phospho‐regulated PDZ domain interactions , 2018, Molecular systems biology.

[4]  P. Jemth,et al.  Design of a PDZbody, a bivalent binder of the E6 protein from human papillomavirus , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  A Conserved Motif Provides Binding Specificity to the PP2A-B56 Phosphatase. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[6]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  Novel linear motif filtering protocol reveals the role of the LC8 dynein light chain in the Hippo pathway , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Short Linear Sequence Motif LxxPTPh Targets Diverse Proteins to Growing Microtubule Ends. , 2017, Structure.

[8]  H. Fung,et al.  IDPs in macromolecular complexes: the roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies. , 2018, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  Clive R. Bagshaw Biomolecular Kinetics: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2017 .

[10]  S. Elledge,et al.  The Eukaryotic Proteome Is Shaped by E3 Ubiquitin Ligases Targeting C-Terminal Degrons , 2018, Cell.

[11]  R. Stote,et al.  Structural Basis for Hijacking of Cellular LxxLL Motifs by Papillomavirus E6 Oncoproteins , 2013, Science.

[12]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  SLiMSearch: a framework for proteome-wide discovery and annotation of functional modules in intrinsically disordered regions , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  E. Barbar,et al.  Polybivalency and disordered proteins in ordering macromolecular assemblies. , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[14]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  Degrons in cancer , 2017, Science Signaling.

[15]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Short linear motifs – ex nihilo evolution of protein regulation , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[16]  M. Rapé,et al.  Multisite dependency of an E3 ligase controls monoubiquitylation-dependent cell fate decisions , 2018, eLife.

[17]  Russell M Gordley,et al.  Modular engineering of cellular signaling proteins and networks. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[18]  W. Lim,et al.  Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  M. Lewitzky,et al.  Conformational recognition of an intrinsically disordered protein. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[20]  E. Nishida,et al.  A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Contextual Specificity in Peptide-Mediated Protein Interactions , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  Monika Fuxreiter,et al.  Fuzziness in Protein Interactions-A Historical Perspective. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  M. Cyert,et al.  Cracking the Phosphatase Code: Docking Interactions Determine Substrate Specificity , 2009, Science Signaling.

[24]  M Madan Babu,et al.  Use of host-like peptide motifs in viral proteins is a prevalent strategy in host-virus interactions. , 2014, Cell reports.

[25]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Large-scale interaction profiling of PDZ domains through proteomic peptide-phage display using human and viral phage peptidomes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Gianni Cesareni,et al.  In Vitro Evolution of Recognition Specificity Mediated by SH3 Domains Reveals Target Recognition Rules* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  V. Dötsch,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[28]  Prisca Boisguerin,et al.  Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  P. Jemth,et al.  Binding Rate Constants Reveal Distinct Features of Disordered Protein Domains. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[30]  Toby J. Gibson,et al.  The eukaryotic linear motif resource – 2018 update , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[32]  Toby J. Gibson,et al.  Experimental detection of short regulatory motifs in eukaryotic proteins: tips for good practice as well as for bad , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[33]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Human SH3 Domain Family Reveals a Wide Variety of Non-canonical Specificities. , 2017, Structure.

[34]  Sarah A. Clark,et al.  Multivalency regulates activity in an intrinsically disordered transcription factor , 2018, eLife.

[35]  G. Pielak,et al.  A cell is more than the sum of its (dilute) parts: A brief history of quinary structure , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  Y. Jacob,et al.  Targeting the Two Oncogenic Functional Sites of the HPV E6 Oncoprotein with a High-Affinity Bivalent Ligand** , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[37]  Y. Ivarsson,et al.  High-throughput methods for identification of protein-protein interactions involving short linear motifs , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[38]  M. Bollen,et al.  Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM. , 2016, Structure.

[39]  Philip M. Kim,et al.  Motif mediated protein-protein interactions as drug targets , 2016, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[40]  S. Gee,et al.  Single-amino acid substitutions alter the specificity and affinity of PDZ domains for their ligands. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[41]  S. Michnick,et al.  Evolution of domain–peptide interactions to coadapt specificity and affinity to functional diversity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Mathematical Modeling Suggests Cooperative Interactions between a Disordered Polyvalent Ligand and a Single Receptor Site , 2003, Current Biology.

[43]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  Discovery of short linear motif‐mediated interactions through phage display of intrinsically disordered regions of the human proteome , 2017, The FEBS journal.

[44]  C. Hovens,et al.  Mutagenesis and selection of PDZ domains that bind new protein targets , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  Coevolution of PDZ domain-ligand interactions analyzed by high-throughput phage display and deep sequencing. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.

[46]  P. Jemth,et al.  Improved affinity at the cost of decreased specificity: a recurring theme in PDZ-peptide interactions , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Scaffold Proteins: Hubs for Controlling the Flow of Cellular Information , 2011, Science.

[48]  Aidan Budd,et al.  Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[49]  S. Michnick,et al.  High-resolution mapping of protein concentration reveals principles of proteome architecture and adaptation. , 2014, Cell reports.

[50]  M Madan Babu,et al.  High‐throughput discovery of functional disordered regions: investigation of transactivation domains , 2018, Molecular systems biology.

[51]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  Systematic discovery of linear binding motifs targeting an ancient protein interaction surface on MAP kinases , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[52]  M. Madan Babu,et al.  The contribution of intrinsically disordered regions to protein function, cellular complexity, and human disease , 2016, Biochemical Society transactions.

[53]  Amy E Keating,et al.  SORTCERY-A High-Throughput Method to Affinity Rank Peptide Ligands. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  C. Dieterich,et al.  Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[55]  M. Vendruscolo,et al.  Emergence and evolution of an interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins , 2017, eLife.

[56]  Chris Sander,et al.  A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family , 2008, PLoS biology.

[57]  Lucía B. Chemes,et al.  Short linear motif core and flanking regions modulate retinoblastoma protein binding affinity and specificity. , 2018, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[58]  S. Li,et al.  Evolving specificity from variability for protein interaction domains. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[59]  J. Clarke,et al.  Conserved Helix-Flanking Prolines Modulate Intrinsically Disordered Protein:Target Affinity by Altering the Lifetime of the Bound Complex , 2017, Biochemistry.

[60]  Renaud Vincentelli,et al.  Quantifying domain-ligand affinities and specificities by high-throughput holdup assay , 2015, Nature Methods.

[61]  Michele Tinti,et al.  The SH2 domain interaction landscape. , 2013, Cell reports.

[62]  Paul H. Bessette,et al.  Rapid isolation of high-affinity protein binding peptides using bacterial display. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[63]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  R. Pappu,et al.  A High-Throughput Mutational Scan of an Intrinsically Disordered Acidic Transcriptional Activation Domain. , 2018, Cell systems.

[65]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[66]  Mingjie Zhang,et al.  PDZ Ligand Binding-Induced Conformational Coupling of the PDZ-SH3-GK Tandems in PSD-95 Family MAGUKs. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  L. Lam,et al.  ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[68]  Brett W. Engelmann,et al.  SH2 Domains Recognize Contextual Peptide Sequence Information to Determine Selectivity* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[69]  Rudolf Volkmer,et al.  Synthetic peptide arrays for investigating protein interaction domains , 2012, FEBS letters.

[70]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[71]  P. Kitov,et al.  On the nature of the multivalency effect: a thermodynamic model. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[72]  G. Baillie,et al.  Peptide array-based screening reveals a large number of proteins interacting with the ankyrin-repeat domain of the zDHHC17 S-acyltransferase , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[73]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[74]  Vincent Frappier,et al.  PixelDB: Protein–peptide complexes annotated with structural conservation of the peptide binding mode , 2018, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[75]  P. Jemth,et al.  How Fast Is Protein-Ligand Association? , 2017, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[76]  P. Jemth,et al.  Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[77]  M. Burkard,et al.  PP2A-B′ holoenzyme substrate recognition, regulation and role in cytokinesis , 2017, Cell Discovery.

[78]  Allegra Via,et al.  How pathogens use linear motifs to perturb host cell networks. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[79]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[80]  Norman E. Davey,et al.  The Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein Recruits the Host PP2A-B56 Phosphatase to Activate Transcriptional Support Activity of VP30. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[81]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.