Affinity and specificity of motif-based protein-protein interactions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ruedi Aebersold,et al. The calcineurin signaling network evolves via conserved kinase‐phosphatase modules that transcend substrate identity (586.3) , 2014, Molecular cell.
[2] Jason W Locasale,et al. Allovalency revisited: an analysis of multisite phosphorylation and substrate rebinding. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[3] P. Güntert,et al. Proteome‐wide analysis of phospho‐regulated PDZ domain interactions , 2018, Molecular systems biology.
[4] P. Jemth,et al. Design of a PDZbody, a bivalent binder of the E6 protein from human papillomavirus , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[5] Norman E. Davey,et al. A Conserved Motif Provides Binding Specificity to the PP2A-B56 Phosphatase. , 2016, Molecular cell.
[6] Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al. Novel linear motif filtering protocol reveals the role of the LC8 dynein light chain in the Hippo pathway , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[7] M. Steinmetz,et al. Short Linear Sequence Motif LxxPTPh Targets Diverse Proteins to Growing Microtubule Ends. , 2017, Structure.
[8] H. Fung,et al. IDPs in macromolecular complexes: the roles of multivalent interactions in diverse assemblies. , 2018, Current opinion in structural biology.
[9] Clive R. Bagshaw. Biomolecular Kinetics: A Step-by-Step Guide , 2017 .
[10] S. Elledge,et al. The Eukaryotic Proteome Is Shaped by E3 Ubiquitin Ligases Targeting C-Terminal Degrons , 2018, Cell.
[11] R. Stote,et al. Structural Basis for Hijacking of Cellular LxxLL Motifs by Papillomavirus E6 Oncoproteins , 2013, Science.
[12] Norman E. Davey,et al. SLiMSearch: a framework for proteome-wide discovery and annotation of functional modules in intrinsically disordered regions , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..
[13] E. Barbar,et al. Polybivalency and disordered proteins in ordering macromolecular assemblies. , 2015, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[14] Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al. Degrons in cancer , 2017, Science Signaling.
[15] Alan M. Moses,et al. Short linear motifs – ex nihilo evolution of protein regulation , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[16] M. Rapé,et al. Multisite dependency of an E3 ligase controls monoubiquitylation-dependent cell fate decisions , 2018, eLife.
[17] Russell M Gordley,et al. Modular engineering of cellular signaling proteins and networks. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.
[18] W. Lim,et al. Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.
[19] M. Lewitzky,et al. Conformational recognition of an intrinsically disordered protein. , 2014, Biophysical journal.
[20] E. Nishida,et al. A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.
[21] Patrick Aloy,et al. Contextual Specificity in Peptide-Mediated Protein Interactions , 2008, PloS one.
[22] Monika Fuxreiter,et al. Fuzziness in Protein Interactions-A Historical Perspective. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] M. Cyert,et al. Cracking the Phosphatase Code: Docking Interactions Determine Substrate Specificity , 2009, Science Signaling.
[24] M Madan Babu,et al. Use of host-like peptide motifs in viral proteins is a prevalent strategy in host-virus interactions. , 2014, Cell reports.
[25] Tony Pawson,et al. Large-scale interaction profiling of PDZ domains through proteomic peptide-phage display using human and viral phage peptidomes , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[26] Gianni Cesareni,et al. In Vitro Evolution of Recognition Specificity Mediated by SH3 Domains Reveals Target Recognition Rules* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[27] V. Dötsch,et al. Structural and functional analysis of the GABARAP interaction motif (GIM) , 2016, bioRxiv.
[28] Prisca Boisguerin,et al. Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[29] P. Jemth,et al. Binding Rate Constants Reveal Distinct Features of Disordered Protein Domains. , 2015, Biochemistry.
[30] Toby J. Gibson,et al. The eukaryotic linear motif resource – 2018 update , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..
[31] M. Madan Babu,et al. A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.
[32] Toby J. Gibson,et al. Experimental detection of short regulatory motifs in eukaryotic proteins: tips for good practice as well as for bad , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[33] Gary D Bader,et al. Comprehensive Analysis of the Human SH3 Domain Family Reveals a Wide Variety of Non-canonical Specificities. , 2017, Structure.
[34] Sarah A. Clark,et al. Multivalency regulates activity in an intrinsically disordered transcription factor , 2018, eLife.
[35] G. Pielak,et al. A cell is more than the sum of its (dilute) parts: A brief history of quinary structure , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[36] Y. Jacob,et al. Targeting the Two Oncogenic Functional Sites of the HPV E6 Oncoprotein with a High-Affinity Bivalent Ligand** , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.
[37] Y. Ivarsson,et al. High-throughput methods for identification of protein-protein interactions involving short linear motifs , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[38] M. Bollen,et al. Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM. , 2016, Structure.
[39] Philip M. Kim,et al. Motif mediated protein-protein interactions as drug targets , 2016, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[40] S. Gee,et al. Single-amino acid substitutions alter the specificity and affinity of PDZ domains for their ligands. , 2000, Biochemistry.
[41] S. Michnick,et al. Evolution of domain–peptide interactions to coadapt specificity and affinity to functional diversity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Tony Pawson,et al. Mathematical Modeling Suggests Cooperative Interactions between a Disordered Polyvalent Ligand and a Single Receptor Site , 2003, Current Biology.
[43] Norman E. Davey,et al. Discovery of short linear motif‐mediated interactions through phage display of intrinsically disordered regions of the human proteome , 2017, The FEBS journal.
[44] C. Hovens,et al. Mutagenesis and selection of PDZ domains that bind new protein targets , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.
[45] Gary D. Bader,et al. Coevolution of PDZ domain-ligand interactions analyzed by high-throughput phage display and deep sequencing. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.
[46] P. Jemth,et al. Improved affinity at the cost of decreased specificity: a recurring theme in PDZ-peptide interactions , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[47] Wendell A. Lim,et al. Scaffold Proteins: Hubs for Controlling the Flow of Cellular Information , 2011, Science.
[48] Aidan Budd,et al. Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.
[49] S. Michnick,et al. High-resolution mapping of protein concentration reveals principles of proteome architecture and adaptation. , 2014, Cell reports.
[50] M Madan Babu,et al. High‐throughput discovery of functional disordered regions: investigation of transactivation domains , 2018, Molecular systems biology.
[51] Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al. Systematic discovery of linear binding motifs targeting an ancient protein interaction surface on MAP kinases , 2015, Molecular systems biology.
[52] M. Madan Babu,et al. The contribution of intrinsically disordered regions to protein function, cellular complexity, and human disease , 2016, Biochemical Society transactions.
[53] Amy E Keating,et al. SORTCERY-A High-Throughput Method to Affinity Rank Peptide Ligands. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.
[54] C. Dieterich,et al. Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.
[55] M. Vendruscolo,et al. Emergence and evolution of an interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins , 2017, eLife.
[56] Chris Sander,et al. A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family , 2008, PLoS biology.
[57] Lucía B. Chemes,et al. Short linear motif core and flanking regions modulate retinoblastoma protein binding affinity and specificity. , 2018, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[58] S. Li,et al. Evolving specificity from variability for protein interaction domains. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[59] J. Clarke,et al. Conserved Helix-Flanking Prolines Modulate Intrinsically Disordered Protein:Target Affinity by Altering the Lifetime of the Bound Complex , 2017, Biochemistry.
[60] Renaud Vincentelli,et al. Quantifying domain-ligand affinities and specificities by high-throughput holdup assay , 2015, Nature Methods.
[61] Michele Tinti,et al. The SH2 domain interaction landscape. , 2013, Cell reports.
[62] Paul H. Bessette,et al. Rapid isolation of high-affinity protein binding peptides using bacterial display. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[63] Mike Tyers,et al. Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[64] R. Pappu,et al. A High-Throughput Mutational Scan of an Intrinsically Disordered Acidic Transcriptional Activation Domain. , 2018, Cell systems.
[65] H. Dyson,et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[66] Mingjie Zhang,et al. PDZ Ligand Binding-Induced Conformational Coupling of the PDZ-SH3-GK Tandems in PSD-95 Family MAGUKs. , 2018, Journal of molecular biology.
[67] L. Lam,et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets , 2013, Nature Medicine.
[68] Brett W. Engelmann,et al. SH2 Domains Recognize Contextual Peptide Sequence Information to Determine Selectivity* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[69] Rudolf Volkmer,et al. Synthetic peptide arrays for investigating protein interaction domains , 2012, FEBS letters.
[70] M. Steinmetz,et al. Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight , 2015, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[71] P. Kitov,et al. On the nature of the multivalency effect: a thermodynamic model. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[72] G. Baillie,et al. Peptide array-based screening reveals a large number of proteins interacting with the ankyrin-repeat domain of the zDHHC17 S-acyltransferase , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[73] Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al. Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[74] Vincent Frappier,et al. PixelDB: Protein–peptide complexes annotated with structural conservation of the peptide binding mode , 2018, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[75] P. Jemth,et al. How Fast Is Protein-Ligand Association? , 2017, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[76] P. Jemth,et al. Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.
[77] M. Burkard,et al. PP2A-B′ holoenzyme substrate recognition, regulation and role in cytokinesis , 2017, Cell Discovery.
[78] Allegra Via,et al. How pathogens use linear motifs to perturb host cell networks. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[79] Wendell A. Lim,et al. Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.
[80] Norman E. Davey,et al. The Ebola Virus Nucleoprotein Recruits the Host PP2A-B56 Phosphatase to Activate Transcriptional Support Activity of VP30. , 2018, Molecular cell.
[81] M. Ptashne,et al. Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.