Estimating Mammalian Species Diversity across an Urban Gradient

Abstract Human development is changing the landscape in many ways that affect the distribution of wild species of mammals. Most previous work has focused on birds with only a few studies that examine the effects of urbanization on mammalian species. Using a combination of live trapping, track plates, and observation, we collected preliminary data in which we quantified patterns of species distributions across a rural-urban gradient in southwestern Ohio. Individual species responded differently to aspects of human development. As seen in some previous avian but not mammalian studies, mammalian species richness was greatest at intermediate levels of development. Using cluster analysis, we were able to group sites into three types based on species richness: the most rural sites, those with a moderate degree of development, and the most urban site. This study shows that mammals respond to urbanization in similar ways to birds and butterflies and suggests that different variables may be necessary to explain the observed patterns.

[1]  Olaus Johan Murie,et al.  A field guide to animal tracks , 1954 .

[2]  J. Marzluff.  Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds , 2001 .

[3]  Gordon A. Bradley,et al.  Urban forest landscapes : integrating multidisciplinary perspectives , 1995 .

[4]  L. Adams.  Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[5]  P. Reich,et al.  Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in suburban, rural and reserve landscapes of Minnesota, USA , 2007 .

[6]  M. Mcdonnell,et al.  The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  J. Lawton,et al.  Predation by domestic cats in an English village , 1987 .

[8]  M. Palmer.  PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[9]  M. Bowers,et al.  Foraging of Gray Squirrels on an Urban‐Rural Gradient: Use of the Gud to Assess Anthropogenic Impact , 1996 .

[10]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[11]  R. Blair.  Birds and Butterflies Along Urban Gradients in Two Ecoregions of the United States: Is Urbanization Creating a Homogeneous Fauna? , 2001 .

[12]  R. Blair,et al.  Nesting success and life history attributes of bird communities along an urbanization gradient , 2005 .

[13]  Jeremy D. Maestas,et al.  Biodiversity across a Rural Land‐Use Gradient , 2003 .

[14]  L. Getz,et al.  A Device for Preventing Disturbance of Small Mammal Live-Traps , 1974 .

[15]  J. Wiens,et al.  Bird communities of the Colorado Rocky Mountains along a gradient of exurban development , 2005 .

[16]  A. Magurran.  Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[17]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Temporal variation in the woody understory of an old‐growth Fagus‐Acer forest and implications for overstory recruitment , 1997 .

[18]  R. Blair,et al.  Predation on artificial bird nests along an urban gradient: predatory risk or relaxation in urban environments? , 1999 .

[19]  John M. Marzluff,et al.  Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[20]  G. Racey,et al.  Small mammal and habitat response to shoreline cottage development in central Ontario , 1982 .

[21]  J. Dunning,et al.  Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern Desert habitats , 1989 .

[22]  H. Stanley,et al.  Modelling urban growth patterns , 1995, Nature.

[23]  K. Gaston,et al.  Avian assemblage structure and domestic cat densities in urban environments , 2007 .

[24]  G. Cueto,et al.  Changes in rodent communities according to the landscape structure in an urban ecosystem , 2009 .

[25]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Microhabitats in a Forest-Floor Small Mammal Fauna , 1978 .

[26]  C. O. Hoffmann,et al.  Numbers, Distribution, and Movements of a Raccoon Population in a Suburban Residential Community , 1977 .

[27]  F. Berkes,et al.  Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management , 2004 .

[28]  Christine M. Schonewald,et al.  Patterns of human disturbance and response by small mammals and birds in chaparral near urban development , 1998, Urban Ecosystems.

[29]  Sandra L. Haire,et al.  Patterns of Rodent Abundance on Open‐Space Grasslands in Relation to Suburban Edges , 2002 .

[30]  R. Sikes,et al.  Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research , 2007 .

[31]  S. Gehrt,et al.  Demographic factors contributing to high raccoon densities in urban landscapes , 2003 .

[32]  J. Anderies,et al.  Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems , 2010 .

[33]  M. Soulé,et al.  Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system , 1999, Nature.

[34]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine : survey methods for their detection / [technical editors], William J. Zielinski, Thomas E. Kucera. , 1998 .

[35]  Jack L. Gottschang.  A Guide to the Mammals of Ohio , 1981 .

[36]  B. Czech,et al.  Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States , 2000 .

[37]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Ralph J. Alig,et al.  Urban and built-up land area changes in the United States: an empirical investigation of determinants. , 1987 .

[39]  Gordon L. Kirkland,et al.  Guidelines for the Capture, Handling, and Care of Mammals as Approved by the American Society of Mammalogists , 1998 .

[40]  M. McKinney,et al.  Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals , 2008, Urban Ecosystems.

[41]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Effects of Urbanization on Avian Community Organization , 1982 .

[42]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas , 2001 .

[43]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Special Feature: The Use of Urban Gradients in Ecological Studies , 1990 .

[44]  Jeffrey A. Stratford,et al.  Distribution of neotropical migratory bird species across an urbanizing landscape , 2005, Urban Ecosystems.

[45]  H. H. Wooten.  Major Uses of Land in the United States , 1953 .

[46]  S. Gehrt,et al.  INFLUENCES OF ANTHROPOGENIC RESOURCES ON RACCOON (PROCYON LOTOR) MOVEMENTS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION , 2004 .

[47]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[48]  S. Harris,et al.  Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area , 2005 .

[49]  J. S. Larson,et al.  Chipmunks in residential environments , 1976 .

[50]  M. Vesterby,et al.  Major Uses of Land in The United States, 2002 , 2006 .

[51]  H. M. Raup,et al.  Deciduous Forests of Eastern north America , 1952 .

[52]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient , 1997 .

[53]  D. Barratt.  Predation by house cats, Felis catus (L.), in Canberra, Australia. II. Factors affecting the amount of prey caught and estimates of the impact on wildlife , 1998 .

[54]  R. Lopez,et al.  Fox Squirrel Survival in Urban and Rural Environments , 2008 .

[55]  R. Whittaker,et al.  GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION* , 1967, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[56]  R. Kays,et al.  Ecological impact of inside/outside house cats around a suburban nature preserve , 2004 .

[57]  Michel Baguette,et al.  Landscape variables impact the structure and composition of butterfly assemblages along an urbanization gradient , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[58]  Lowell W. Adams,et al.  Urban Wildlife Habitats: A Landscape Perspective , 1994 .

[59]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient , 1998, Oecologia.

[60]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[61]  S. Harris,et al.  Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain , 2003 .

[62]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[63]  M. Clout,et al.  The prey of domestic cats ( Felis catus ) in two suburbs of Auckland City, New Zealand , 2003 .

[64]  J. Marzluff.  Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes , 2005 .

[65]  W. Bossert,et al.  The Measurement of Diversity , 2001 .

[66]  R. Blair,et al.  Woody vegetation and canopy fragmentation along a forest-to-urban gradient , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[67]  Robert B. Blair,et al.  The Effects of Urban Sprawl on Birds at Multiple Levels of Biological Organization , 2004 .

[68]  Steven D. Garber.  The urban naturalist , 1987 .

[69]  C. Braak.  Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[70]  D. Gorchov,et al.  Urbanization and riparian forest woody communities: Diversity, composition, and structure within a metropolitan landscape , 2010 .

[71]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 , 2010 .

[72]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Conservation Where People Live and Work , 2002 .

[73]  S. Pickett,et al.  The Application of the Ecological Gradient Paradigm to the Study of Urban Effects , 1993 .

[74]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[75]  J. Layne.  An enclosure for protecting small mammal traps from disturbance , 1987 .

[76]  Larry W. Vandruff,et al.  Habitat association of mammals in Syracuse, New York , 1986 .

[77]  J. L. Avondet,et al.  Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) Response to Changes in Ecological Parameters Across an Urban Gradient , 2003 .

[78]  Marcela Suarez-Rubio,et al.  Influence of exurban development on bird species richness and diversity , 2011, Journal of Ornithology.

[79]  J. Terborgh.  Distribution on Environmental Gradients: Theory and a Preliminary Interpretation of Distributional Patterns in the Avifauna of the Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru , 1971 .

[80]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation , 2002 .

[81]  J. Goszczyński,et al.  Penetration of mammals over urban green spaces in Warsaw , 1979 .

[82]  John J. Walsh,et al.  Urban effects on native avifauna: a review , 2006 .

[83]  B. Wakeling,et al.  Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA , 2001 .

[84]  J. Yunger,et al.  CARNIVORE OCCURRENCE ALONG AN URBAN–RURAL GRADIENT: A LANDSCAPE-LEVEL ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[85]  K. Ferraz,et al.  Diet of free-ranging cats and dogs in a suburban and rural environment, south-eastern Brazil , 2007 .

[86]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[87]  Reproduction, foraging and the negative density–area relationship of a generalist rodent , 2005, Oecologia.

[88]  Aaron M.Ellison.  PC‐ORD: Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data , 1998, The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America.

[89]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  Breeding Bird Abundance in an Urbanizing Landscape in Coastal Southern California , 1997 .