Check Your Stereotypes at the Door: An Analysis of Gender Typecasts in Social Human-Robot Interaction

In this paper, we provide evidence that suggests prominent gender stereotypes might not be as pronounced in human-robot interaction as may be expected based on previous research. We investigate stereotypes about people interacting with robots, such as men being more engaged, and stereotypes which may be applied to robots that have a perceived gender, such as female robots being perceived as more suitable for household duties. Through a user study, we not only fail to find support for many existing stereotypes, but our analysis suggests that if such effects exist, they may be small. This implies that interface and robot designers need to be wary of which stereotypes they bring to the table, and should understand that even stereotypes with prior experimental evidence may not manifest strongly in social human-robot interaction.

[1]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Keep an Eye on the Task! How Gender Typicality of Tasks Influence Human–Robot Interactions , 2012, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[2]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Women take a wider view , 2002, CHI.

[4]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Task Structure and User Attributes as Elements of Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[6]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[7]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Addressing Gender Differences in Computer Ability, Attitudes and Use: The Laptop Effect , 2006 .

[8]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  Gender pluralism in problem-solving software , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[9]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  J. Holmes.  Women, Men and Politeness , 1995 .

[11]  Rachid Alami,et al.  How may I serve you?: a robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context , 2006, HRI '06.

[12]  Cynthia Cockburn,et al.  Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe , 1994 .

[13]  Anne Cranny-Francis,et al.  Gender Studies: Terms and Debates , 2002 .

[14]  J. Young,et al.  Beyond Pink and Blue: Gendered Attitudes towards Robots in Society , 2014 .

[15]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[16]  Margaret M. Burnett,et al.  Gender: An Important Factor in End-User Programming Environments? , 2004, 2004 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages - Human Centric Computing.

[17]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[18]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[19]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Gendered or neutral?: considering the language of HCI , 2015, Graphics Interface.

[20]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Sacrifice One For the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.