Automated Workflow for Somatic and Germline Next Generation Sequencing Analysis in Routine Clinical Cancer Diagnostics

Thanks to personalized medicine trends and collaborations between industry, clinical research groups and regulatory agencies, next generation sequencing (NGS) is turning into a common practice faster than one could have originally expected. When considering clinical applications of NGS in oncology, a rapid workflow for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples, as well as producing high quality library preparation, can be real challenges. Here we consider these targets and how applying effective automation technology to NGS workflows may help improve yield, timing and quality-control. We firstly evaluated DNA recovery from archived FFPE blocks from three different manual extraction methods and two automated extraction workstations. The workflow was then implemented to somatic (lung/colon panel) and germline (BRCA1/2) library preparation for NGS analysis exploiting two automated workstations. All commercial kits gave good results in terms of DNA yield and quality. On the other hand, the automated workstation workflow has been proven to be a valid automatic extraction system to obtain high quality DNA suitable for NGS analysis (lung/colon Ampli-seq panel). Moreover, it can be efficiently integrated with an open liquid handling platform to provide high-quality libraries from germline DNA with more reproducibility and high coverage for targeted sequences in less time (BRCA1/2). The introduction of automation in routine workflow leads to an improvement of NGS standardization and increased scale up of sample preparations, reducing labor and timing, with optimization of reagents and management.

[1]  John D Pfeifer,et al.  Comparison of clinical targeted next-generation sequence data from formalin-fixed and fresh-frozen tissue specimens. , 2013, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[2]  D. Lazarević,et al.  Performance comparison of two commercial human whole-exome capture systems on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung adenocarcinoma samples , 2016, BMC Cancer.

[3]  J. Tran van Nhieu,et al.  DNA degrades during storage in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks , 2017, Virchows Archiv.

[4]  Tomas Szemes,et al.  Fragmentation of DNA affects the accuracy of the DNA quantitation by the commonly used methods , 2013, Biological Procedures Online.

[5]  W. Lam,et al.  DNA Extraction from Paraffin Embedded Material for Genetic and Epigenetic Analyses , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[6]  A. Janecka,et al.  Comparison of eight commercially available kits for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. , 2015, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  S. Nachimuthu,et al.  A simple method of genomic DNA extraction from human samples for PCR-RFLP analysis. , 2013, Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT.

[8]  Soile Tapio,et al.  Nucleic acids from long-term preserved FFPE tissues are suitable for downstream analyses , 2012, Virchows Archiv.

[9]  David W. Russell,et al.  Isolation of High-molecular-weight DNA from Mammalian Cells Using Proteinase K and Phenol. , 2017, CSH protocols.

[10]  J. Lundeberg,et al.  Automation of cDNA Synthesis and Labelling Improves Reproducibility , 2009, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[11]  G. Scambia,et al.  A Whole Germline BRCA2 Gene Deletion: How to Learn from CNV In Silico Analysis , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[12]  J. Rossi,et al.  Effect of fixation on the amplification of nucleic acids from paraffin-embedded material by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1991, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[13]  H. Budka,et al.  Effects of Formalin Fixation, Paraffin Embedding, and Time of Storage on DNA Preservation in Brain Tissue: A BrainNet Europe Study , 2007, Brain pathology.

[14]  A. Rossi,et al.  Frequent NRG1 fusions in Caucasian pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma predicted by Phospho-ErbB3 expression , 2017, Oncotarget.

[15]  G. Scambia,et al.  A preliminary Quality Control (QC) for next generation sequencing (NGS) library evaluation turns out to be a very useful tool for a rapid detection of BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations. , 2014, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[16]  P. Schirmacher,et al.  Guidance Statement On BRCA1/2 Tumor Testing in Ovarian Cancer Patients. , 2017, Seminars in oncology.

[17]  C. Jubin,et al.  Performance comparison of three DNA extraction kits on human whole-exome data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded normal and tumor samples , 2018, PloS one.

[18]  F. Mignone,et al.  Clinical impact on ovarian cancer patients of massive parallel sequencing for BRCA mutation detection: the experience at Gemelli hospital and a literature review , 2015, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[19]  David W. Russell,et al.  Purification of Closed Circular DNA by Equilibrium Centrifugation in CsCl-Ethidium Bromide Gradients: Discontinuous Gradients. , 2006, CSH protocols.

[20]  Rita T. Lawlor,et al.  DNA Qualification Workflow for Next Generation Sequencing of Histopathological Samples , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  S. Bonin,et al.  PCR analysis in archival postmortem tissues , 2003, Molecular pathology : MP.

[22]  C. Wheeler,et al.  Sample preparation and PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues. , 1994, PCR methods and applications.

[23]  G. Scambia,et al.  Main implications related to the switch to BRCA1/2 tumor testing in ovarian cancer patients: a proposal of a consensus , 2018, Oncotarget.

[24]  Identification and Characterization of a New BRCA2 Rearrangement in an Italian Family with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome , 2017, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.

[25]  Sergio Callejas,et al.  AG-NGS: a powerful and user-friendly computing application for the semi-automated preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries using open liquid handling platforms. , 2014, BioTechniques.

[26]  B. Thyagarajan,et al.  Review of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[27]  E. Barış,et al.  Comparison of Methods for the Extraction of DNA from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Archival Tissues , 2014, International journal of medical sciences.

[28]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Reliability and performance of commercial RNA and DNA extraction kits for FFPE tissue cores , 2017, PloS one.

[29]  Michael Worobey,et al.  The Isolation of Nucleic Acids from Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues–Which Methods Are Useful When? , 2007, PloS one.

[30]  D. Shibata,et al.  Analysis of DNA sequences in forty-year-old paraffin-embedded thin-tissue sections: a bridge between molecular biology and classical histology. , 1988, Cancer research.

[31]  S. Jewell,et al.  Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Review Effect of Fixatives and Tissue Processing on the Content and Integrity of Nucleic Acids , 2022 .