Large nuisance modulation has little impact on IT target match performance

Many everyday tasks require us to extract a specific type of information from our environment while ignoring other things. When the neurons in our brains that carry task-relevant signals are also modulated by task-irrelevant, ‘nuisance’ information, nuisance modulation is expected to act as performance-limiting noise. To investigate the impact of nuisance modulation on neural task performance, we recorded responses in inferotemporal cortex (IT) as monkeys performed a task in which they were rewarded for indicating when a target object appeared amid considerable nuisance variation. Within IT, we found a robust, behaviorally-relevant target match signal that was mixed with large nuisance modulations in individual neurons. Unexpectedly, we also found that these nuisance modulations had little impact on performance, either within individual IT neurons or across the IT population. We demonstrate how these results follow from fast processing in IT, which placed IT in a low spike count regime where the impact of nuisance variability was blunted by Poisson-like trial variability. These results demonstrate that some basic intuitions about neural coding are misguided in the context of a fast-processing, low spike count regime.

[1]  Nicole C Rust,et al.  Quantifying the signals contained in heterogeneous neural responses and determining their relationships with task performance. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Fyall,et al.  The Role of Visual Area V4 in the Discrimination of Partially Occluded Shapes , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Distinct Encoding of Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Information in Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Selectivity and Tolerance (“Invariance”) Both Increase as Visual Information Propagates from Cortical Area V4 to IT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  David D. Cox,et al.  What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Science.

[9]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Independent Category and Spatial Encoding in Parietal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Neural Quadratic Discriminant Analysis: Nonlinear Decoding with V1-Like Computation , 2016, Neural Computation.

[12]  David D. Cox,et al.  Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Jay A. Hennig,et al.  Signal Multiplexing and Single-Neuron Computations in Lateral Intraparietal Area During Decision-Making , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Dora E Angelaki,et al.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Ha Hong,et al.  Explicit information for category-orthogonal object properties increases along the ventral stream , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  The Sparseness of Mixed Selectivity Neurons Controls the Generalization–Discrimination Trade-Off , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[19]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Signals in inferotemporal and perirhinal cortex suggest an “untangling” of visual target information , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Tatiana A. Engel,et al.  Same or Different? A Neural Circuit Mechanism of Similarity-Based Pattern Match Decision Making , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Nicole C Rust,et al.  Dynamic Target Match Signals in Perirhinal Cortex Can Be Explained by Instantaneous Computations That Act on Dynamic Input from Inferotemporal Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  A category-free neural population supports evolving demands during decision-making , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Daeyeol Lee,et al.  Effects of noise correlations on information encoding and decoding. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Pouget,et al.  Correlations and Neuronal Population Information. , 2016, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  B J Richmond,et al.  Role of inferior temporal neurons in visual memory. II. Multiplying temporal waveforms related to vision and memory. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  Evaluating neuronal codes for inference using Fisher information , 2010, NIPS.

[29]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data , 2014, eLife.

[30]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[32]  A. Pouget,et al.  Information-limiting correlations , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.