Assessing urban environmental segregation (UES). The case of Santiago de Chile

Abstract Urban environmental segregation (UES) would differentiate between the environment of poor people and the environment of rich people. We apply selected indicators for the urban environment, especially indicators of urban patterns and of urban environmental quality. These indicators will illuminate the social distribution of environmental quality and the socio-spatial exposure toward urban flooding. The comprehensive approach for the UES assessment is first, to analyze if land-use dynamics expands into areas with high environmental impact, second, to explore where and how social segregation is expressed in the study area, and third, to analyze different indicators for the urban environment. Therefore the key parameters for urban dynamics and UES are the built-up area, degrees of imperviousness, green spaces (indicators of urban patterns), environmental exposure and mitigations measures (indicators of environmental quality). They are linked to the indices of social segregation, i.e. isolation and concentration. The presented approach offers a new dimension in research of social segregation by adding the above mentioned aspects of the urban environment and so gaining a new assessment of UES. In the case of Santiago de Chile, the complex urban landscape is leading to fragmented socio-spatial configurations. The urban problems of Santiago de Chile cannot be framed in a purely social or environmental context. On a large scale it is investigated, if socio-spatial distribution is balanced and whether residents of different social groups have different spatial furnishing of green spaces, different built-up densities, and different exposure to natural hazards. We conclude that land-use dynamics in Santiago produce a higher urban complexity and fragmentation. In the in-depth study area we prove intra-municipal UES in close proximity. Furthermore, social segregation is accompanied by unequal distribution of environmental features. One spatial indicator is the uneven distribution of urban green. As a consequence, environmental differences between different social strata are extremely contrasting.

[1]  Juan Antonio Mondéjar Jiménez,et al.  Documento de trabajo , 2011 .

[2]  R. Peters USE and Management , 1997 .

[3]  Marcela Salgado,et al.  Desigualdades socioeconómicas y distribución inequitativa de los riesgos ambientales en las comunas de Peñalolén y San Pedro de la Paz. Una perspectiva de justicia ambiental , 2009 .

[4]  N. Heynen,et al.  Urban forest and environmental inequality in Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil , 2002, Urban Ecosystems.

[5]  Gerardo Azócar,et al.  Cambio en los patrones de crecimiento en una ciudad intermedia: el caso de Chillán en Chile Central , 2003 .

[6]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability , 1998 .

[7]  Annegret Kindler,et al.  Monitoring urban to peri‐urban development with integrated remote sensing and GIS information: a Leipzig, Germany case study , 2009 .

[8]  E. Krieg,et al.  Not so Black and White: environmental justice and cumulative impact assessments , 2004 .

[9]  E. Banzhaf,et al.  Indicators for sustainable land use management in Santiago de Chile , 2011 .

[10]  Hugo Romero,et al.  Cambios climáticos y climas urbanos: Relaciones entre zonas termales y condiciones socioeconómicas de la población de Santiago de Chile , 2010 .

[11]  Rodrigo Hidalgo Dattwyler,et al.  Los Mega-diseños residenciales vallados en las periferias de las metrópolis latinoamericanas y el advenimiento de un nuevo concepto de ciudad. Alcances en base al caso de Santiago de Chile , 2005 .

[12]  F. Escobedo,et al.  VEGETATION DIVERSITY IN THE SANTIAGO DE CHILE URBAN ECOSYSTEM , 2002 .

[13]  Sonia Ramírez,et al.  Santiago de Chile , 2012 .

[14]  G. Walker,et al.  Geographies of Environmental Justice. , 2006 .

[15]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Scales of environmental justice: combining GIS and spatial analysis for air toxics in West Oakland, California. , 2006, Health & place.

[16]  Annegret Kindler,et al.  Land-Use Change, Risk and Land-Use Management , 2012 .

[17]  G. Caceres,et al.  Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las tres últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción , 2001 .

[18]  F. Escobedo,et al.  The socioeconomics and management of Santiago de Chile's public urban forests , 2006 .

[19]  M. Holden Urban indicators and the integrative ideals of cities , 2006 .

[20]  Pablo Sarricolea Espinoza,et al.  Caracterización de los cambios de usos y coberturas de suelos causados por la expansión urbana de Santiago, análisis estadístico de sus factores explicativos e inferencias ambientales. , 2006 .

[21]  R. Hidalgo De los pequeños condominios a la ciudad vallada: las urbanizaciones cerradas y la nueva geografía social en Santiago de Chile (1990-2000) , 2004 .

[22]  A. Müller,et al.  Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach – a case study for Santiago de Chile , 2011 .

[23]  Sonia Reyes Päcke,et al.  Distribución, superficie y accesibilidad de las áreas verdes en Santiago de Chile , 2010 .

[24]  Rusong Wang,et al.  Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: A case study for China's Jining City , 2009 .

[25]  Kerstin Krellenberg,et al.  Dinámicas recientes y relaciones entre las estructuras urbanas y socioeconómicas en Santiago de Chile: el caso de Peñalolén , 2011 .

[26]  Casey J. Dawkins Measuring the Spatial Pattern of Residential Segregation , 2004 .

[27]  Gilberto Câmara,et al.  Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..