Effectiveness of a raised road: rail crossing for the safety of road vehicle occupants

A raised crossing (RC), as an alternate to the current form of level crossings to minimise risks of wheel-rail contact failure under frontal collision of trains onto stuck trucks, has been recently formulated by the authors (Engineering Failure Analysis, 80 (2017) 403–415) to mitigate the severity of accidents at road-rail crossings. The aim of the present paper is to assess the effectiveness of the profile of the RC to minimise the risk of speeding through and minimise the peak vertical acceleration of the passing road vehicle below the threshold level for discomfort and safety of its occupants. For this purpose, a simplified two-dimensional multibody dynamic simulation modelling method has been formulated and validated using a detailed three-dimensional industry standard model. The validated model has then been used to optimise the geometric profile of the RC by minimising the peak vertical accelerations of the occupants below the safety threshold of 0.7 g. It is shown that the optimised profile of the RC increases the peak acceleration with the increase in speed of travel of the road vehicles whilst the LC does the opposite. This finding confirms that the RC has the potential to reduce the risk of speeding, which is vital to the safety of the train and road vehicles at rail – road crossings.

[1]  A.J.C. Schmeitz.  A Semi-Empirical Three-Dimensional Model of the Pneumatic Tyre Rolling over Arbitrarily Uneven Road Surfaces , 2004 .

[2]  P. E. Uys,et al.  Suspension settings for optimal ride comfort of off-road vehicles travelling on roads with different roughness and speeds , 2007 .

[3]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics , 2009 .

[4]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Dynamic simulation of train–truck collision at level crossings , 2017 .

[5]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Dynamic response of the train–track–bridge system subjected to derailment impacts , 2018 .

[6]  Aref M. A. Soliman,et al.  Parameters Affecting Truck Ride Comfort , 2014 .

[7]  Gregory Wheeler,et al.  Validation of ADAMS® Models of Two USMC Heavy Logistic Vehicle Design Variants , 2001 .

[8]  Audrius Vaitkus,et al.  Analysis and Evaluation of Trapezoidal Speed Humps and Their Impact on the Driver , 2018, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering.

[9]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Minimising lateral impact derailment potential at level crossings through guard rails , 2016 .

[10]  Yuping He,et al.  A comparative study of multi-trailer articulated heavy-vehicle models , 2015 .

[11]  Measurement of whole-body vibration exposure from speed control humps , 2007 .

[12]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Frontal collision of trains onto obliquely stuck road trucks at level crossings: Derailment mechanisms and simulation , 2017 .

[13]  Victor V. Krylov,et al.  Ground-borne vibration generated by vehicles crossing road humps and speed control cushions , 2000 .

[14]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Dynamics of railway wagons subjected to braking torques on defective tracks , 2012 .

[15]  John McPhee,et al.  A Review of Automated Design Synthesis Approaches for Virtual Development of Ground Vehicle Suspensions , 2007 .

[16]  Ali Abdi Kordani,et al.  Optimization of Speed Hump Profiles Based on Vehicle Dynamic Performance Modeling , 2014 .

[17]  Annika Stensson Trigell,et al.  Advanced vehicle dynamics of heavy trucks with the perspective of road safety , 2017 .

[18]  Li-Sian Tey,et al.  Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Dynamics of railway wagons subjected to braking/traction torque , 2009 .

[20]  Kazem Reza Kashyzadeh,et al.  Investigating the effect of road roughness on automotive component , 2014 .

[21]  James Freeman,et al.  The experiences and perceptions of heavy vehicle drivers and train drivers of dangers at railway level crossings. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Andry Rakotonirainy,et al.  Driver's behavioural changes with new intelligent transport system interventions at railway level crossings--A driving simulator study. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  S. Iwnicki,et al.  Prediction of wheel and rail wear under different contact conditions using artificial neural networks , 2018, Wear.

[24]  H Prem,et al.  COMPARISON OF MODELLING SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY VEHICLES (PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARDS: NRTC/AUSTROADS PROJECT A3 AND A4): WORKING PAPER , 2001 .

[25]  Michael Gipser.  FTire and puzzling tyre physics: teacher, not student , 2016 .

[26]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Detection of Rail Wheel Flats using Wavelet Approaches , 2007 .

[27]  Yong Yang,et al.  Study on ride comfort of tractor with tandem suspension based on multi-body system dynamics , 2009 .

[28]  Li-Sian Tey,et al.  Measuring driver responses at railway level crossings. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  G R Watts.  ROAD HUMPS FOR THE CONTROL OF VEHICLE SPEEDS , 1973 .

[30]  Wanming Zhai,et al.  A locomotive–track coupled vertical dynamics model with gear transmissions , 2017 .

[31]  P. Schalk Els,et al.  Parameterization and modelling of large off-road tyres for ride analyses: Part 2 – Parameterization and validation of tyre models , 2014 .

[32]  Chongfeng Wei.  A finite element based approach to characterising flexible ring tire (FTire) model for extended range of operating conditions , 2015 .

[33]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  An Inertial Reference Frame Method for the Simulation of the Effect of Longitudinal Force to the Dynamics of Railway Wheelsets , 2006 .

[34]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Assessment of road-rail crossing collision derailments on curved tracks , 2017 .

[35]  Simon Iwnicki,et al.  The Manchester Benchmarks for Rail Vehicle Simulation , 1998 .

[36]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  A Multi-Body Dynamic Model for Analysis of Localized Track Responses in Vicinity of Rail Discontinuities , 2016 .

[37]  Emad Khorshid,et al.  A numerical study on the optimal geometric design of speed control humps , 2004 .

[38]  Oldřich Kropáč,et al.  Effect of obstacles in the road profile on the dynamic response of a vehicle , 2008 .

[39]  Masoud Shariatpanahi,et al.  Multiobjective shape optimization of speed humps , 2008 .

[40]  Kaiyun Wang,et al.  Reducing rail side wear on heavy-haul railway curves based on wheel–rail dynamic interaction , 2014 .

[41]  S. S. Law,et al.  Bridge dynamic responses due to road surface roughness and braking of vehicle , 2005 .

[42]  Peter Múčka,et al.  Influence of tyre–road contact model on vehicle vibration response , 2015 .

[43]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  Lateral impact derailment mechanisms, simulation and analysis , 2016 .

[44]  Michael Gipser,et al.  FTire: a physically based application-oriented tyre model for use with detailed MBS and finite-element suspension models , 2005 .

[45]  Manicka Dhanasekar,et al.  A passive road-rail crossing design to minimise wheel-rail contact failure risk under frontal collision of trains onto stuck trucks , 2017 .

[46]  Wei Wang,et al.  Fatigue Design of Steel Bridges Considering the Effect of Dynamic Vehicle Loading and Overloaded Trucks , 2016 .

[47]  B Kidd,et al.  Reduction of speed limit at approaches to railway level crossings in WA , 2011 .

[48]  Theunis R. Botha,et al.  Profile Optimization of Table Top Speed Hump for Speed Control , 2011 .