Assessing Surface Flowpath Interception by Vegetative Buffers Using ArcGIS Hydrologic Modeling and Geospatial Analysis for Rock Creek Watershed, Central Iowa

Nonpoint-source (NPS) pollution is a major cause of surface water quality degradation due to the transport of chemicals, nutrients, and sediments into lakes and streams. Vegetative buffers comprise several effective landscape best management practices (BMPs) that include vegetative filter strips (VFS) and grassed waterways. However, some BMPs are less effective due to concentrated surface flow, improper cropland-toVFS area ratios, and surface flowpaths that partially or completely bypass vegetative buffers. The overall objective of this study was to quantify the accuracy of simulated flowpaths relative to observed and global positioning system (GPS)-assisted ground-truthed surface flowpaths for improved placement of VFS and other vegetative buffers to effectively intercept surface runoff. This study was conducted on three research sites in Rock Creek watershed in central Iowa. Geographic information system (GIS) software was used for flowpath hydrologic modeling and geospatial map comparison analysis. Digital elevation model (DEM) datasets were used for flowpath simulation and included internet-available USGS 30 m × 30 m grid (typically used to design and site VFS buffers) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) 5 m × 5 m grid DEMs. Results from this study indicate that the LiDAR 5 m × 5 m DEM generated significantly more accurate simulated flowpaths than the USGS 30 m × 30 m DEM. These results quantitatively underscore the efficacy of using high-resolution LiDAR DEM data to more accurately determine how well surface flowpaths are intercepted by VFS and other vegetative buffers. These results also demonstrate the benefits of coupling highresolution aerial imagery with quantitative geospatial map comparison data to improve visualization and comparison of fieldscale and watershed-scale hydrologic and terrestrial attributes. Ultimately, the results and procedures from this study will be applied to the development of a novel cloud-based, user-interactive, virtual-reality decision support (DS) tool that can be used to remotely assess hydrologic landscape conditions, prescribe improvements to existing BMPs, and determine new sites for enhanced BMP placement and functionality within a high-resolution 3-D imagery environment.

[1]  T. Richard,et al.  Hydrologic modeling of runoff from a livestock manure windrow composting site with a fly ash pad surface and vegetative filter strip buffers , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  Thomas M. Isenhart,et al.  Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. , 2003 .

[3]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Assessment of concentrated flow through riparian buffers , 2002 .

[4]  P. Starks,et al.  Impact of Eastern redcedar encroachment on stream discharge in the North Canadian River basin , 2017, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[5]  P. M. van Dijk,et al.  Retention of water and sediment by grass strips , 1996 .

[6]  Majed Abu-Zreig,et al.  Factors affecting sediment trapping in vegetated filter strips: simulation study using VFSMOD , 2001 .

[7]  David John Unwin,et al.  Introductory Spatial Analysis , 1982 .

[8]  Fan-Rui Meng,et al.  Stream network modelling using lidar and photogrammetric digital elevation models: a comparison and field verification , 2008 .

[9]  L. D. Meyer,et al.  Sediment-trapping effectiveness of stiff-grass hedges , 1995 .

[10]  Ramesh P. Rudra,et al.  Experimental investigation of runoff reduction and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips , 2004 .

[11]  Geoffrey C. Poole,et al.  Surface hydrology of low-relief landscapes : Assessing surface water flow impedance using LIDAR-derived digital elevation models , 2008 .

[12]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[13]  Brian McConkey,et al.  Lidar DEM error analyses and topographic depression identification in a hummocky landscape in the prairie region of Canada , 2011 .

[14]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[15]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Effects of DEM sources on hydrologic applications , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[16]  Jin Teng,et al.  Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  R. Gatti,et al.  Prioritizing wetland restoration activity within a Wisconsin watershed using GIS modeling , 1999 .

[18]  Bahram Gharabaghi,et al.  Sediment-Removal Efficiency of Vegetative Filter Strips , 2001 .

[19]  Karen R. Burow,et al.  The quality of our Nation's waters-Nutrients in the Nation's streams and groundwater, 1992-2004 , 2010 .

[20]  W. Powers,et al.  Livestock grazing and vegetative filter strip buffer effects on runoff sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses , 2010, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[21]  Fan-Rui Meng,et al.  Impacts of Accuracy and Resolution of Conventional and LiDAR Based DEMs on Parameters Used in Hydrologic Modeling , 2010 .

[22]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control , 1989 .

[23]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Herbicide Retention by Vegetative Buffer Strips from Runoff under Natural Rainfall , 1996 .

[24]  James R. Brandle,et al.  Change in filter strip performance over ten years , 2007 .

[25]  Xiaoye Liu,et al.  Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues , 2008 .

[26]  T. Richard,et al.  Effects of a livestock manure windrow composting site with a fly ash pad surface and vegetative filter strip buffers on sediment, nitrate, and phosphorus losses with runoff , 2009, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[27]  MICHAEL F. GOODCHILD,et al.  A Simple Positional Accuracy Measure for Linear Features , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Manveen Bansal,et al.  Vegetative filter strip assessment in the state of Iowa , 2006 .

[29]  S. Mickelson,et al.  Using ArcGIS hydrologic modeling and LiDAR digital elevation data to evaluate surface runoff interception performance of riparian vegetative filter strip buffers in central Iowa , 2019, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[30]  D. Webber.  Comparing estimated surface flowpaths and sub-basins derived from digital elevation models of Bear Creek watershed in central Iowa , 2000 .

[31]  Z. Yin,et al.  A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales , 1998 .

[33]  Seth J. Wenger,et al.  A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation , 1999 .

[34]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Building channel networks for flat regions in digital elevation models , 2009 .

[35]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Effectiveness of vegetated buffer strips in reducing pesticide transport in simulated runoff , 2003 .

[36]  W. Subra,et al.  Non point source pollution , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[37]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[38]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  PESTICIDE TRANSPORT WITH SURFACE RUNOFF AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE THROUGH A VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIP , 2003 .

[39]  S. Broadmeadow,et al.  The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice , 2004 .