Tradeoffs between the strength of conformity and number of conformists in variable environments.

Organisms often respond to environmental change phenotypically, through learning strategies that enhance fitness in variable and changing conditions. But which strategies should we expect in population exposed to those conditions? We address this question by developing a mathematical model that specifies the consequences of different mixtures of individual and social learning strategies on the frequencies of different cultural variants in temporally and spatially changing environments. Assuming that alternative cultural variants are differently well-adapted to diverse environmental conditions, we are able to evaluate which mixture of learning strategies maximises the mean fitness of the population. We find that, even in rapidly changing environments, a high proportion of the population will always engage in social learning. In those environments, the highest adaptation levels are achieved through relatively high fractions of individual learning and a strong conformist bias. We establish a negative relationship between the proportion of the population learning socially and the strength of conformity operating in a population: strong conformity requires fewer conformists (i.e. larger proportion of individual learning), while many conformists can only be found when conformist transmission is weak. Investigations of cultural diversity show that in frequently changing environments high levels of adaptation require high level of cultural diversity. Finally, we demonstrate how the developed mathematical framework can be applied to time series of usage or occurrence data of cultural traits. Using Approximate Bayesian Computation we are able to infer information about the underlying learning processes that could have produced observed patterns of variation in the dataset.

[1]  Benjamin Bossan,et al.  The evolution of social learning , 2013 .

[2]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  Alan R. Rogers,et al.  Does Biology Constrain Culture , 1988 .

[4]  P. Richerson,et al.  Not by Genes Alone , 2004 .

[5]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily stable versus fitness maximizing life histories under frequency-dependent selection , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  The evolution of social learning rules: payoff-biased and frequency-dependent biased transmission. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals , 2005 .

[8]  R. Plevin,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Computation in Evolution and Ecology , 2011 .

[9]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission , 2008 .

[10]  K. Laland Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[11]  M. Feldman,et al.  Individual Versus Social Learning: Evolutionary Analysis in a Fluctuating Environment , 1996 .

[12]  Paul Marjoram,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Wataru Nakahashi,et al.  The evolution of conformist transmission in social learning when the environment changes periodically. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  KenichiAoki,et al.  The Emergence of Social Learning in a Temporally Changing Environment: A Theoretical Model1 , 2005 .

[15]  L. Rendell,et al.  How copying affects the amount, evenness and persistence of cultural knowledge: insights from the social learning strategies tournament , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Joseph Henrich,et al.  Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations : adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change and much of sociocultural evolution , 2001 .

[17]  P. W. Frank,et al.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 1972 .

[18]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  CRITICAL POINTS IN CURRENT THEORY OF CONFORMIST SOCIAL LEARNING , 2007 .

[19]  Robert Aunger That complex whole: culture and the evolution of human behavior;: by Lee Cronk, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999, xv 1 160 pp., ISBN 0-8133-3704-6, US $50.00 , 2000 .

[20]  J. Emlen,et al.  Ecology : an evolutionary approach , 1973 .

[21]  L. Cronk,et al.  That Complex Whole: Culture And The Evolution Of Human Behavior , 1999 .

[22]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between innovation and cultural diversity. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[23]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimization Theory in Evolution , 1978 .

[24]  Joe Yuichiro Wakano,et al.  Do social learning and conformist bias coevolve? Henrich and Boyd revisited. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  K. Laland,et al.  The evolutionary basis of human social learning , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  K. Laland,et al.  Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  E. Wilson,et al.  Human Behavioural Ecology , 2003 .

[28]  Joe Yuichiro Wakano,et al.  Evolution of social learning: a mathematical analysis. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[29]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. , 1998 .

[30]  C. Heyes,et al.  SOCIAL LEARNING IN ANIMALS: CATEGORIES AND MECHANISMS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[31]  Joe Yuichiro Wakano,et al.  Adaptive Social Learning Strategies in Temporally and Spatially Varying Environments , 2012, Human Nature.

[32]  R. Lande NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  Richard McElreath,et al.  The evolutionary rationality of social learning , 2013 .

[34]  W. E. Ritter AS TO THE CAUSES OF EVOLUTION. , 1923, Science.

[35]  P. Richerson,et al.  • AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF SOCIAL LEARNING: THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATON , 2013 .

[36]  Keith Jones,et al.  Not by genes alone , 2006 .

[37]  H. Roche,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010 .

[38]  C. Lumsden Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Robert Boyd, Peter J. Richerson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London (1985), viii, +301. Price $29.95 , 1986 .

[39]  P. Richerson,et al.  Built for Speed: Pleistocene Climate Variation and the Origin of Human Culture , 2000 .

[40]  T. Lillicrap,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010, Science.

[41]  Luke Rendell,et al.  ROGERS’ PARADOX RECAST AND RESOLVED: POPULATION STRUCTURE AND THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL LEARNING STRATEGIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder,et al.  Human Behavioural Ecology , 2012 .

[43]  Kenichi Aoki,et al.  Evolution of learning in subdivided populations that occupy environmentally heterogeneous sites. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.