Action Research is Similar to Design Science

In management information systems (MIS) action research is long considered as promising but low-level research approach. It has an utmost relevance because action researchers are working with practitioners to solve the important practical problem. Design science outlined some years ago is just winning a wider audience. Action research was traditionally classified into qualitative research methods. But it seems to be the “wrong” home of action research. We shall show that after comparison of the seven aspects: concrete results of the study, knowledge produced, activities, the intent and the nature of a study, the division of labor in a study and generation, use and test of knowledge, the concordance between the characteristics of action research on the one hand and of design science on the other hand is very good. Hence, action research and design science should next be considered as similar research approaches, and this is a turning point in the history of both action research and design science.

[1]  R. Torretti.  Mario Bunge: Scientific research. I. The search for system. II. The search for truth. Berlin Heidelberg. New York. Springer-Verlag. 1967 , 1967 .

[2]  M. Bunge,et al.  Scientific Research I: The Search for System , 1967 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[4]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[5]  Richard L. Van Horn,et al.  Empirical studies of management information systems , 1973, DATB.

[6]  Joachim Israel.  Swedish Socialism and Big Business , 1978 .

[7]  P. Oquist,et al.  The Epistemology of Action Research , 1978 .

[8]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[9]  Gordon Bitter Davis,et al.  Writing the Doctoral Dissertation: A Systematic Approach , 1979 .

[10]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems , 1980 .

[12]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[14]  Brian Cantwell Smith,et al.  The limits of correctness , 1985, CSOC.

[15]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[16]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development , 1991 .

[17]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  L Olfman,et al.  End‐user software training: an experimental comparison of methods to enhance motivation , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis , 1995 .

[23]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  J. R. G. Wood,et al.  A further exploration into information systems development: the evolution of Multiview2 , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[25]  Charles L. Owen,et al.  Design research: building the knowledge base☆ , 1998 .

[26]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[27]  Aken van Je.  Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences : the quest for tested and grounded technological rules , 2001 .

[28]  David Coghian.  Insider Action Research Projects , 2001 .

[29]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[30]  Béatrice Lallé,et al.  The Management Science Researcher between Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[31]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[32]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[33]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[34]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..

[35]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Managing Risk in Software Process Improvement: An Action Research Approach , 2004, MIS Q..

[36]  Pär Mårtensson,et al.  Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation , 2004, MIS Q..

[37]  G A Cioffi,et al.  Theoretically speaking , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[38]  Luigi Colombo,et al.  Building information system , 2005 .

[39]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[40]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  A Design Theory for Secure Information Systems Design Methods , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  J. Kendall,et al.  Writing the Doctoral Dissertation: A Systematic Approach , 2022 .