An exploratory study of alignment issues of IT acceptance with professionals in a project setting

The information technology (IT) literature has demonstrated a link with business performance and effectiveness when IT and business objectives are aligned. However, project settings and joint-venture projects in particular, challenge the way alignment has been conceptualized, exposing other sources of alignment. Projects require a quick diffusion of IT to many different stakeholders with different individual and group interests representing many professions with different professional affiliations. Coordinating the diverse groups of individual expertise that often have short stays and weak allegiance to the project is quite difficult. These factors lead to many types of incentive problems in learning and using new IT necessary for project success. This potentially leads to individuals rejecting or bypassing the use of mandated information technology when the individual's personal, group or professional interests do not coincide with project objectives. As a result, a joint venture project setting challenges the underlying assumptions of Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Technology Acceptance Model, thus providing an important contribution for theoretical development in the IT diffusion literature. Therefore, an important research question for IT diffusion, arising from project situations, is: How are individual professional and project incentives aligned in order to diffuse the necessary IT to achieve coordination and project success? The results of this exploratory study conclude that alignment issues affecting an individual's IT acceptance on joint venture projects originates from many unexplored sources. These five alignment issues include objectives, work output, work value, technology expectations, and peers and are required by the individual, their originating company, the project, and the owner company. Each of these alignment issues reveals different aspects of a complex negotiated order to IT diffusion.

[1]  Francis T. Hartman Don't Park Your Brain Outside: A Practical Guide to Improving Shareholder Value With Smart Management , 1999 .

[2]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[3]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[4]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[5]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Achieving and Sustaining Business-IT Alignment , 1999 .

[7]  Negotiating Order in Interorganizational Communication: Discourse Analysis of a Meeting of Three Diverse Organizations , 2003 .

[8]  Roberto Venosa,et al.  Negotiations: varieties, contexts, processes and social order , 1992 .

[9]  R. Yin The abridged version of case study research: Design and method. , 1998 .

[10]  N. Hatton ASKING QUESTIONS , 1979, The Medical journal of Australia.

[11]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[12]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition , 1982 .

[13]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[14]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The future of diffusion research , 2001, DATB.

[15]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[17]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[18]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[19]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Preliminary evidence for the effect of automatic responses to authority on information technology diffusion , 2001, DATB.

[20]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[23]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text , 2000 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. , 1979 .

[25]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Clients, Contractors, and Consultants: The Consequences of Organizational Fragmentation in Contemporary Project Environments , 2001 .

[26]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[27]  Soon Ang,et al.  Work Outcomes and Job Design for Contract Versus Permanent Information Systems Professionals on Software Development Teams , 2001, MIS Q..