Message addressing schemes

One of the most important problems in electronic mail systems is the specification of names and addresses in the messages [13, 14]. In many current message systems this problem is handled in a specific but narrow manner [2]. However, it is important to abstract the problem and to deal with it independently, without any consideration of the physical routing of the messages. It can be argued that the only addressing problem in electronic mail systems is co associate the attributes of a person to a unique id. However, there are cases where the originator of the mail cannot quite determine or indicate the proper recipients. In addition, we want to incorporate intelligence used by persons handling mail (e.g., secretaries). A sophisticated mail addressing scheme should attempt to deal with such intelligence in order to automate certain mail procedures. Consider a message system consisting of messages, addresses, persons receiving messages, and stations routing the messages. An addressing scheme is any way of specifying and interpreting information on messages so as to finally bring them to the attention of the proper recipients. In this paper we shall identify different addressing schemes and investigate their properties. To illustrate the differences in addressing schemes, consider three different paradigms. As a first example, consider the manner in which letters are addressed in regular post office mail. The addressing scheme assumes the existence of a hierarchical structure of mail stations and addresses (country, state, city, street,

[1]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  Form management , 1982, CACM.

[2]  Moshé M. Zloof QBE/OBE: A Language for Office and Business Automation , 1981, Computer.

[3]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  Imail - An Intelligent Mail System , 1983, IEEE Database Eng. Bull..

[4]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms , 1974 .

[5]  Ray A. Jarvis,et al.  A Computer Vision and Robotics Laboratory , 1982, Computer.

[6]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The impact of office automation on the organization: some implications for research and practice , 1982, CACM.

[7]  Frederick H. Lochovsky,et al.  Routing specification in a message management system , 1983 .

[8]  P. Schicker Naming and addressing in a computer-based mail environment , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Jo-Mei Chang,et al.  Database Alerting Techniques for Office Activities Management , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Thomas Patrick Martin A communication model for message management systems , 1984 .

[11]  Oscar Nierstrasz,et al.  A System for Managing Structured Messages , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Douglas K. Brotz Message system mores: etiquette in Laurel , 1983, TOIS.

[13]  Oscar Nierstrasz,et al.  Message Flow Modeling , 2022 .

[14]  David D. Redell,et al.  Evolution of the Ethernet Local Computer Network , 1982, Computer.

[15]  Michael M. Hammer,et al.  Office Automation , 1980, Topics in Information Systems.

[16]  Dennis Tsichritzis Integrating data base and message systems , 1981, VLDB 1981.

[17]  Roger M. Needham,et al.  Grapevine: an exercise in distributed computing , 1982, CACM.

[18]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Office Information Systems and Computer Science , 1980, CSUR.