Noninvasive determination of carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement

Objectives European Society of Hypertension guidelines recommend use of carotid– femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) as a favored measure of aortic stiffness. However, there is no consensus on the measurement of distance travelled by the pulse wave along the aorta to the femoral artery. The aim of our study was to compare cfPWV, calculated with commonly used noninvasive methods for travel distance assessment, against aortic PWV measured invasively. Methods One hundred and thirty-five patients had aortic PWV measured invasively during cardiac catheterization, from the delay in wave foot and distance travelled as the catheter was withdrawn from the ascending aorta to the aortic bifurcation. On the following day, noninvasive cfPWV was assessed, using the SphygmoCor system, relating the delay between carotid and femoral wavefoot to travel distance, estimated with five different methods on body surface. Results Mean travel times were in good agreement [(travel time) TTinvasive was 63 ms, TTnoninvasive was 59.3 ms, Spearman's R: 0.8, P < 0.00001]. Mean PWVinvasive was 8.5 m/s. CfPWV, as assessed noninvasively, depended largely on the method used for travel distance estimation: 11.5, 9.9, 8.7, 11.9, and 9.6 m/s, using direct carotid–femoral distance, carotid–femoral minus carotid–suprasternal notch distances, suprasternal notch–femoral minus carotid–suprasternal notch distances, suprasternal notch–femoral plus carotid–suprasternal notch distances, and suprasternal notch–symphysis distance, respectively. There was acceptable correspondence between PWVinvasive and cfPWVnoninvasive (Spearman's R: 0.73–0.77, P < 0.0001). Conclusion For noninvasive assessment of cfPWV, estimation of pulse wave travel distance is critical. Best agreement with invasive measurements was found for the method of subtracting carotid–suprasternal notch distance from suprasternal notch–femoral distance.

[1]  K. Kawecka-Jaszcz,et al.  Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[2]  Patrick Segers,et al.  Age and gender related patterns in carotid-femoral PWV and carotid and femoral stiffness in a large healthy, middle-aged population , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[3]  G. Nickenig,et al.  A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  S. Vermeersch.  Reference values for arterial stiffness in 22,796 European subjects , 2008 .

[5]  T. Grodzicki,et al.  Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: Similarities and Discrepancies , 2007, Hypertension Research.

[6]  A. Dominiczak,et al.  2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2007, European heart journal.

[7]  Thomas Weber,et al.  Arterial wave reflections and determinants of endothelial function a hypothesis based on peripheral mode of action. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[8]  R. Schmieder,et al.  Guidelines for management of arterial hypertension , 2007 .

[9]  H. Struijker‐Boudier,et al.  Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. , 2006, European heart journal.

[10]  Albert Hofman,et al.  Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: The Rotterdam Study , 2006, Circulation.

[11]  Tine Willum Hansen,et al.  Prognostic Value of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity as Index of Arterial Stiffness in the General Population , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  L. V. Van Bortel.  Is arterial stiffness ready for daily clinical practice? , 2006, Journal of Hypertension.

[13]  P. Chowienczyk,et al.  Evaluation of Carotid–Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: Influence of Timing Algorithm and Heart Rate , 2005, Hypertension.

[14]  S. Anderson,et al.  Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity and Its Relationship to Mortality in Diabetes and Glucose Intolerance: An Integrated Index of Vascular Function? , 2002, Circulation.

[15]  S. Laurent,et al.  Aortic Stiffness Is an Independent Predictor of Primary Coronary Events in Hypertensive Patients: A Longitudinal Study , 2002, Hypertension.

[16]  J. Blacher,et al.  Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. , 1999, Circulation.

[17]  D. A. Mcdonald,et al.  Regional pulse-wave velocity in the arterial tree. , 1968, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  R. Kark,et al.  Observations on a mobile Arctic force; the health, physical fitness and nutrition of Exercise Musk Ox, February-May 1945. , 1948, Journal of applied physiology.