Performance Analysis of Cone Detection Algorithms

Many algorithms have been proposed to help clinicians evaluate cone density and spacing, as these may be related to the onset of retinal diseases. However, there has been no rigorous comparison of the performance of these algorithms. In addition, the performance of such algorithms is typically determined by comparison with human observers. Here we propose a technique to simulate realistic images of the cone mosaic. We use the simulated images to test the performance of three popular cone detection algorithms, and we introduce an algorithm which is used by astronomers to detect stars in astronomical images. We use Free Response Operating Characteristic (FROC) curves to evaluate and compare the performance of the four algorithms. This allows us to optimize the performance of each algorithm. We observe that performance is significantly enhanced by up-sampling the images. We investigate the effect of noise and image quality on cone mosaic parameters estimated using the different algorithms, finding that the estimated regularity is the most sensitive parameter.

[1]  Marco Lombardo,et al.  ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING OF PARAFOVEAL CONES IN TYPE 1 DIABETES , 2014, Retina.

[2]  Karen M. Hampson,et al.  Adaptive optics and vision , 2008 .

[3]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Technical Factors Influencing Cone Packing Density Estimates in Adaptive Optics Flood Illuminated Retinal Images , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Okan K. Ersoy.  Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics , 2006 .

[5]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The FFA shows a face inversion effect that is correlated with the behavioral face inversion effect , 2010 .

[7]  D. Williams,et al.  Consequences of spatial sampling by a human photoreceptor mosaic. , 1983, Science.

[8]  Laurent M. Mugnier,et al.  Myopic deconvolution of adaptive optics retina images , 2011, BiOS.

[9]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  Alfredo Dubra,et al.  Adaptive Optics Retinal Imaging – Clinical Opportunities and Challenges , 2013, Current eye research.

[11]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Automatic segmentation of closed-contour features in ophthalmic images using graph theory and dynamic programming , 2012, Biomedical optics express.

[12]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Automatic detection of modal spacing (Yellott's ring) in adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  Joseph A. Izatt,et al.  Automatic cone photoreceptor segmentation using graph theory and dynamic programming , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[14]  Nicholas Devaney,et al.  Pre‐processing, registration and selection of adaptive optics corrected retinal images , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  Nicholas Devaney,et al.  Adaptive Optics Technology for High-Resolution Retinal Imaging , 2012, Sensors.

[16]  David Williams,et al.  The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[17]  David Gur,et al.  Area under the Free‐Response ROC Curve (FROC) and a Related Summary Index , 2009, Biometrics.

[18]  J. Yellott.  Spectral consequences of photoreceptor sampling in the rhesus retina. , 1983, Science.

[19]  P. Morton,et al.  Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging , 2003 .

[20]  Marco Lombardo,et al.  Adaptive optics photoreceptor imaging. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[21]  V. Greenstein,et al.  A study of factors affecting the human cone photoreceptor density measured by adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 2013, Experimental eye research.

[22]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Photoreceptor detection in in-vivo Adaptive Optics images of the retina: Towards a simple interactive tool for the physicians , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[24]  John S Werner,et al.  Photoreceptor counting and montaging of en-face retinal images from an adaptive optics fundus camera. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  M. Lombardo,et al.  Eccentricity dependent changes of density, spacing and packing arrangement of parafoveal cones , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  R.M. Mersereau,et al.  The processing of hexagonally sampled two-dimensional signals , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  John F. Hamilton,et al.  A Free Response Approach To The Measurement And Characterization Of Radiographic Observer Performance , 1977, Other Conferences.

[28]  T. Mihashi,et al.  In Vivo Measurements of Cone Photoreceptor Spacing in Myopic Eyes from Images Obtained by an Adaptive Optics Fundus Camera , 2007, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[29]  Philip J. Morrow,et al.  Automated Identification of Photoreceptor Cones Using Multi-scale Modelling and Normalized Cross-Correlation , 2011, ICIAP.

[30]  Robin N. Strickland.  Image-Processing Techniques for Tumor Detection , 2007 .

[31]  Matthijs C. Dorst.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[32]  D. Williams,et al.  Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[34]  J.S. Lee,et al.  Noise Modeling and Estimation of Remotely-Sensed Images , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[35]  Jon P. Marangos.  Topical and tutorial reviews , 2008 .

[36]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Automated identification of cone photoreceptors in adaptive optics retinal images. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  R. G. Fraser,et al.  Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules. , 1986, Radiology.

[38]  Mahnaz Shahidi,et al.  Photoreceptor cell counting in adaptive optics retinal images using content-adaptive filtering , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[39]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  Repeatability of In Vivo Parafoveal Cone Density and Spacing Measurements , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.