Relating Structural and Functional Connectivity in MRI: A Simple Model for a Complex Brain

Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow to gain critical insight into the structure of neural networks and their functional dynamics. To relate structural connectivity [as quantified by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) tractography] and functional connectivity [as obtained from functional MRI (fMRI)], increasing emphasis has been put on computational models of brain activity. In the present study, we use structural equation modeling (SEM) with structural connectivity to predict functional connectivity. The resulting model takes the simple form of a spatial simultaneous autoregressive model (sSAR), whose parameters can be estimated in a Bayesian framework. On synthetic data, results showed very good accuracy and reliability of the inference process. On real data, we found that the sSAR performed significantly better than two other reference models as well as than structural connectivity alone, but that the Bayesian procedure did not bring significant improvement in fit compared to two simpler approaches. Nonetheless, we also found that the values of the region-specific parameters inferred using Bayesian inference differed significantly across resting-state networks. These results demonstrate 1) that a simple abstract model is able to perform better that more complex models based on more realistic assumptions, 2) that the parameters of the sSAR can be estimated and can potentially be used as biomarkers, but also 3) that the sSAR, while being the best-performing model, is at best still a very crude model of the relationship between structure and function in MRI.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET , 1993 .

[2]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[3]  R. Larter,et al.  A coupled ordinary differential equation lattice model for the simulation of epileptic seizures. , 1999, Chaos.

[4]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[6]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Archana Venkataraman,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  L Barnett,et al.  Neural complexity and structural connectivity. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Interactive Spatial Data Analysis , 1995 .

[12]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Joint Modeling of Anatomical and Functional Connectivity for Population Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[17]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  J. LeSage,et al.  Bayesian Model Averaging for Spatial Econometric Models , 2005 .

[19]  G. Gratton,et al.  Combining structural and functional neuroimaging data for studying brain connectivity: a review. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[20]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[22]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Pearl.  On the Statistical Interpretation of Structural Equations , 2011 .

[27]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Robert Haining,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[29]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  K. Ord.  Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial Interaction , 1975 .

[31]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  A Framework for Inter-Subject Prediction of Functional Connectivity From Structural Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Analysis of neural network interactions related to associative learning using structural equation modeling , 1995 .

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics , 2003, Network.

[35]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Tom Heskes,et al.  Bayesian inference of structural brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Computational models of the brain: From structure to function , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[39]  S. Mori,et al.  Principles of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Its Applications to Basic Neuroscience Research , 2006, Neuron.

[40]  J. Song,et al.  Bayesian analysis of simultaneous autoregressive models , 2008 .

[41]  Sw. Banerjee,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data , 2003 .

[42]  B Horwitz,et al.  Simulating functional interactions in the brain: a model for examining correlations between regional cerebral metabolic rates. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[43]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Neuronal Dynamics and Brain Connectivity , 2007 .

[44]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[45]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[46]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Biophysical network models and the human connectome , 2013, NeuroImage.

[48]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Joint Generative Model for fMRI/DWI and Its Application to Population Studies , 2010, MICCAI.

[49]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[50]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[51]  P. Whittle.  ON STATIONARY PROCESSES IN THE PLANE , 1954 .

[52]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference , 2009, NeuroImage.