Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 13 to 16 weeks gestations

Background: The optimal regimen has still to be determined for the use of misoprostol in the surgical termination of pregnancy in the early second trimester. Objective: To compare the outcomes of two different regimens for cervical priming with misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation (D & E) in 13 weeks - 16 weeks gestation pregnancy terminations. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the medical records of two cohorts of 334 women each who were treated with either 3 sublingual doses of 2 misoprostol 200 µg tablets 30 minutes apart on admission or the same dosage preceded by 1 oral tablet of misoprostol 200 µg at home 3 hours before admission. Results: The addition of the home tablet of misoprostol increased the rate of one day completion of D & E from 97.3% to 100% (P = 0.004), and the overall mean theatre time for D&E was reduced by 12.3% in parous women (P = 0.001) and 6.4% in nulliparous women (P = 0.003) with the reduction being consistent across all gestations. Conclusions: This retrospective study showed that the addition of 1 oral tablet of misoprostol 200 µg at home 3 hours before admission to a regimen of 3 sublingual doses of 2 misoprostol 200 µg tablets 30 minutes apart on admission significantly increases the probability of all women at 13 weeks - 16 weeks gestation completing a termination of pregnancy in one day with a single D & E procedure and with a reduced theatre time.

[1]  R. Willcourt,et al.  Comparison of Dilapan-s and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17 – 22 weeks ’ gestation , 2011 .

[2]  L. Meyn,et al.  Cervical preparation for surgical abortion between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation using vaginal misoprostol and Dilapan-S. , 2011, Contraception.

[3]  J. Steinauer,et al.  Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  D. Chambers,et al.  Comparison of four perioperative misoprostol regimens for surgical termination of first‐trimester pregnancy , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  M. Gatter,et al.  Serious adverse events associated with the use of misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to early second trimester surgical abortion (12-16 weeks). , 2008, Contraception.

[6]  P. Lohr,et al.  Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  M. Gatter,et al.  Original research article Serious adverse events associated with the use of misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to early second trimester surgical , 2008 .

[8]  J. Carbonell,et al.  Vaginal vs. sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone for cervical priming in second-trimester abortion by dilation and evacuation: a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Contraception.

[9]  M. Bygdeman,et al.  Effects of misoprostol on uterine contractility following different routes of administration. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[10]  U. Bauer,et al.  [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)]. , 2000, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[11]  B. Pridmore,et al.  Uterine Perforation During Surgical Abortion: A Review of Diagnosis, Management and Prevention , 1999, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.