Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cellular Traction Forces and Mechanosensing of Thin Substrata by Fourier Traction Force Microscopy

We introduce a novel three-dimensional (3D) traction force microscopy (TFM) method motivated by the recent discovery that cells adhering on plane surfaces exert both in-plane and out-of-plane traction stresses. We measure the 3D deformation of the substratum on a thin layer near its surface, and input this information into an exact analytical solution of the elastic equilibrium equation. These operations are performed in the Fourier domain with high computational efficiency, allowing to obtain the 3D traction stresses from raw microscopy images virtually in real time. We also characterize the error of previous two-dimensional (2D) TFM methods that neglect the out-of-plane component of the traction stresses. This analysis reveals that, under certain combinations of experimental parameters (cell size, substratums' thickness and Poisson's ratio), the accuracy of 2D TFM methods is minimally affected by neglecting the out-of-plane component of the traction stresses. Finally, we consider the cell's mechanosensing of substratum thickness by 3D traction stresses, finding that, when cells adhere on thin substrata, their out-of-plane traction stresses can reach four times deeper into the substratum than their in-plane traction stresses. It is also found that the substratum stiffness sensed by applying out-of-plane traction stresses may be up to 10 times larger than the stiffness sensed by applying in-plane traction stresses.

[1]  P. Chavrier,et al.  Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Hui Ma,et al.  Chemoattractant‐mediated transient activation and membrane localization of Akt/PKB is required for efficient chemotaxis to cAMP in Dictyostelium , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[3]  R. Firtel,et al.  The SCAR/WAVE complex is necessary for proper regulation of traction stresses during amoeboid motility , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Shu Chien,et al.  Roles of cell confluency and fluid shear in 3-dimensional intracellular forces in endothelial cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Mechanical forces induced by the transendothelial migration of human neutrophils. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Mechanosensing of substrate thickness. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[9]  Juan C. del Álamo,et al.  Myosin II Is Essential for the Spatiotemporal Organization of Traction Forces during Cell Motility , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  Shu Chien,et al.  Live Cells Exert 3-Dimensional Traction Forces on Their Substrata , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[11]  Shu Chien,et al.  Biochemistry and biomechanics of cell motility. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Matrix Strains Induced by Cells: Computing How Far Cells Can Feel , 2009, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[13]  Alberto Aliseda,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of eukaryotic cell motility by improved force cytometry , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Zhibing Hu,et al.  New method for measuring Poisson's ratio in polymer gels , 1993 .

[15]  M. Dembo,et al.  Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[16]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[17]  N. Langrana,et al.  Simultaneous determination of Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio of soft hydrogels , 2010 .

[18]  Liping Liu THEORY OF ELASTICITY , 2012 .

[19]  H. Weitzner,et al.  Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics , 1969 .

[20]  Christian Franck,et al.  Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  K. V. Van Vliet,et al.  Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[23]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[24]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[25]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices , 2010, Nature Methods.

[26]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Mapping local matrix remodeling induced by a migrating tumor cell using three-dimensional multiple-particle tracking. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[28]  K. Chiam,et al.  Cellular response to substrate rigidity is governed by either stress or strain. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[29]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible polyacrylamide substrata for the analysis of mechanical interactions at cell-substratum adhesions. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[30]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Physical forces during collective cell migration , 2009 .

[31]  T. Masuda,et al.  Poisson's ratio of polyacrylamide (PAAm) gels , 1996 .

[32]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.