To Risk or Not to Risk?: Improving Financial Risk Taking of Older Adults by Online Social Information

Increasing number of older adults manage their retirement savings online. A crucial element of better management is to take rational financial risk -- to strike a reasonable balance between expected gain and loss under uncertainty. With the emergence of Web 2.0 technologies, social trading networks can help individuals make better financial decisions by providing information about others' actions. It is, however, unclear whether these resources is beneficial to older adult's own financial decisions, especially because older adults are vulnerable to poor risk management. To address this question, we devise an experiment that improves upon an existing experimental economic task. We find that both peer information (detailed choices by a few individuals) and majority information (aggregated choices of the crowd) help older adults make more risk-neutral decisions. Furthermore, the combination of peer and majority information corrects more mistakes of more risk-averse older adults.

[1]  Youn-Kyung Kim,et al.  The Relationships Among Family and Social Interaction, Loneliness, Mall Shopping Motivation, and Mall Spending of Older Consumers , 2005 .

[2]  Chris Arney.  Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread - the Lessons from a New Science , 2014 .

[3]  J. Jacko,et al.  The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications , 2002 .

[4]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  A comparison of social, learning, and financial strategies on crowd engagement and output quality , 2014, CSCW.

[5]  Ilan Lobel,et al.  BAYESIAN LEARNING IN SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[6]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, Third Edition , 2012 .

[7]  Paul C. Tetlock,et al.  The Promise of Prediction Markets , 2008, Science.

[8]  Nikolas Coupland,et al.  Formulating age: Dimensions of age identity in elderly talk , 1991 .

[9]  S. Sundar.  The MAIN Model : A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility , 2007 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[11]  Zeinab Abbassi,et al.  Swayed by Friends or by the Crowd? , 2011, SocInfo.

[12]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Expected Value Information Improves Financial Risk Taking Across the Adult Life Span , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[13]  Wei Dong,et al.  Collaborative Indexing and Knowledge Exploration: A Social Learning Model , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[14]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Using interface cues in online health community boards to change impressions and encourage user contribution , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Camelia M. Kuhnen,et al.  Variability in Nucleus Accumbens Activity Mediates Age-Related Suboptimal Financial Risk Taking , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Bruno Ferman,et al.  Understanding Peer Effects in Financial Decisions: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2012 .

[17]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[18]  Anthony Jameson,et al.  Choices and Decisions of Computer Users , 2012 .

[19]  M. Rabin.  Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem , 2000 .

[20]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Decoding Social Influence and the Wisdom of the Crowd in Financial Trading Network , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[21]  Vaibhav Garg,et al.  Risk communication design for older adults , 2012 .

[22]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Cognition, Persuasion and Decision Making in Older Consumers , 2005 .

[23]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Who wants to know?: question-asking and answering practices among facebook users , 2013, CSCW '13.

[24]  Adam Przeworski,et al.  Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin , 2003 .

[25]  Muhammad Zubair Shafiq,et al.  Is news sharing on Twitter ideologically biased? , 2013, CSCW.

[26]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[27]  Oliver K. Burmeister.  What Seniors Value About Online Community , 2012, J. Community Informatics.

[28]  G. Mcnicoll.  World Population Ageing 1950-2050. , 2002 .

[29]  Qian Xu,et al.  The bandwagon effect of collaborative filtering technology , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues' Choices , 2000 .

[31]  Alex Pentland,et al.  The Strength of the Strongest Ties in Collaborative Problem Solving , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[32]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Informing decisions: how people use online rating information to make choices , 2011, CHI.

[33]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , 2007 .

[34]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[35]  Kay Connelly,et al.  Full paper: Risk communication design for older adults , 2012 .

[36]  Anthony Jameson.  Choices and Decisions of Computer Users , 2012 .

[37]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[38]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion , 1993 .

[40]  Eytan Adar,et al.  The impact of social information on visual judgments , 2011, CHI.

[41]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Camelia M. Kuhnen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking , 2005, Neuron.

[43]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Age differences in risky choice: a meta‐analysis , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.