Truth and Context Change

Some dynamic semantic theories include an attempt to derive truth-conditional meaning from context change potential. This implies defining truth in terms of context change. Focusing on presuppositions and epistemic modals, this paper points out some problems with how this project has been carried out. It then suggests a way of overcoming these problems. This involves appealing to a richer notion of context than the one found in standard dynamic systems.

[1]  H. Kamp A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation , 2008 .

[2]  Howard K. Wettstein,et al.  Themes from Kaplan , 1989 .

[3]  A. Stokke,et al.  And and And , 2013 .

[4]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[5]  J. Groenendijk,et al.  Coreference and modality , 1996 .

[6]  H. Savin,et al.  The projection problem for presuppositions , 1971 .

[7]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[8]  Frank Veltman,et al.  Defaults in update semantics , 1996, J. Philos. Log..

[9]  S. Yalcin Epistemic Modals , 2007 .

[10]  B. Geurts Presuppositions and Pronouns , 1999 .

[11]  Anthony S. Gillies,et al.  A New Solution to Moore's Paradox , 2001 .

[12]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  An Opinionated Guide to Epistemic Modality , 2007 .

[13]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Common Ground , 2002 .

[14]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[15]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Local Contexts , 2008 .

[16]  David I. Beaver Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics , 2001 .

[17]  LAURI KARTTUNEN,et al.  PRESUPPOSITION AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT , 1974 .

[18]  Tamar Szabó Gendler,et al.  Oxford Studies in Epistemology , 2005 .

[19]  Jae-Il Yeom,et al.  On Presupposition Projection , 2003 .

[20]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[21]  Michael Grüninger,et al.  Introduction , 2002, CACM.

[22]  Craige Roberts Uniqueness in Definite Noun Phrases , 2003 .

[23]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[24]  Irene Heim,et al.  Features on bound pronouns , 2005 .

[25]  木村 和夫 Pragmatics , 1997, Language Teaching.

[26]  N. Kadmon,et al.  Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus , 2001 .

[27]  Frank Veltman,et al.  An Update on “Might” , 1997, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[28]  David Adger,et al.  Phi theory : phi-features across modules and interfaces , 2008 .

[29]  S. Yalcin Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality , 2011 .

[30]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[31]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Two Theories of Dynamic Semantics , 1991, JELIA.

[32]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .

[33]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[34]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic Montague grammar , 1990 .

[35]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  On the Representation of Context , 1996 .

[36]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Conventional Implicature. Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11, Presupposition , 1981 .

[37]  Gottlob Frege,et al.  The Frege Reader , 1997 .

[38]  P. Strawson III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .