Syncope Time Frames for Adverse Events after Emergency Department Presentation: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Knowledge of the incidence and time frames of the adverse events of patients presenting syncope at the ED is essential for developing effective management strategies. The aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of the incidence and time frames of adverse events of syncope patients. Materials and Methods: We combined individual patients’ data from prospective observational studies including adult patients who presented syncope at the ED. We assessed the pooled rate of adverse events at 24 h, 72 h, 7–10 days, 1 month and 1 year after ED evaluation. Results: We included nine studies that enrolled 12,269 patients. The mean age varied between 53 and 73 years, with 42% to 57% females. The pooled rate of adverse events was 5.1% (95% CI 3.4% to 7.7%) at 24 h, 7.0% (95% CI 4.9% to 9.9%) at 72 h, 8.4% (95% CI 6.2% to 11.3%) at 7–10 days, 10.3% (95% CI 7.8% to 13.3%) at 1 month and 21.3% (95% CI 15.8% to 28.0%) at 1 year. The pooled death rate was 0.2% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.5%) at 24 h, 0.3% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.7%) at 72 h, 0.5% (95% CI 0.3% to 0.9%) at 7–10 days, 1% (95% CI 0.6% to 1.7%) at 1 month and 5.9% (95% CI 4.5% to 7.7%) at 1 year. The most common adverse event was arrhythmia, for which its rate was 3.1% (95% CI 2.0% to 4.9%) at 24 h, 4.8% (95% CI 3.5% to 6.7%) at 72 h, 5.8% (95% CI 4.2% to 7.9%) at 7–10 days, 6.9% (95% CI 5.3% to 9.1%) at 1 month and 9.9% (95% CI 5.5% to 17) at 1 year. Ventricular arrhythmia was rare. Conclusions: The risk of death or life-threatening adverse event is rare in patients presenting syncope at the ED. The most common adverse events are brady and supraventricular arrhythmias, which occur during the first 3 days. Prolonged ECG monitoring in the ED in a short stay unit with ECG monitoring facilities may, therefore, be beneficial.

[1]  R. Furlan,et al.  Multicentre external validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict adverse events and comparison with clinical judgement , 2021, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[2]  B. Rowe,et al.  Benefit of hospital admission for detecting serious adverse events among emergency department patients with syncope: a propensity-score–matched analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort , 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[3]  R. Sandhu,et al.  Lack of benefit from hospitalization in patients with syncope: A propensity analysis , 2020, Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open.

[4]  M. Shah,et al.  Risk Stratification of Older Adults Who Present to the Emergency Department With Syncope: The FAINT Score. , 2020, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  R. Furlan,et al.  Predictive Accuracy of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Patients With Syncope in the Emergency Department: The SyMoNE Multicenter Study. , 2019, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  M. Taljaard,et al.  Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope , 2019, Circulation.

[7]  J. Deharo,et al.  [2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope]. , 2018, Kardiologia polska.

[8]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope , 2018, European heart journal.

[9]  C. Camargo,et al.  Prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Syncope , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[10]  W. Shen,et al.  Outcomes in syncope research: a systematic review and critical appraisal , 2018, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[11]  Daniel E Forman,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[12]  Brian H Rowe,et al.  Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope , 2016, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[13]  G. Lippi,et al.  Short-term Prognosis and Current Management of Syncopal Patients at Intermediate Risk: Results from the IRiS (Intermediate-Risk Syncope) Study. , 2016, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  C. Morillo,et al.  Syncope clinical management in the emergency department: a consensus from the first international workshop on syncope risk stratification in the emergency department. , 2016, European heart journal.

[15]  R. Furlan,et al.  Syncope recurrence and mortality: a systematic review. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  I. Stiell,et al.  Priorities for emergency department syncope research. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  G. Barón-Esquivias,et al.  Prognostic value of the electrocardiogram in patients with syncope: data from the group for syncope study in the emergency room (GESINUR). , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[18]  R. Furlan,et al.  Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  E. Keeler,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of an emergency department observation syncope protocol versus routine inpatient admission. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  Benjamin C. Sun,et al.  Standardized reporting guidelines for emergency department syncope risk-stratification research. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[21]  D. Newby,et al.  One-year prognosis after syncope and the failure of the ROSE decision instrument to predict one-year adverse events. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  C. Mussi,et al.  Early and late outcome of treated patients referred for syncope to emergency department: the EGSYS 2 follow-up study. , 2010, European heart journal.

[23]  R. Furlan,et al.  San Francisco Syncope Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term outcome of syncope. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[24]  E. Hess,et al.  External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in the Canadian setting. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  R. Furlan,et al.  Short- and long-term prognosis of syncope, risk factors, and role of hospital admission: results from the STePS (Short-Term Prognosis of Syncope) study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  C. Mangione,et al.  External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  B. Gersh,et al.  Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS) , 2004, Circulation.

[28]  L. Sikora,et al.  Long-term outcomes in syncope patients presenting to the emergency department: A systematic review. , 2019, CJEM.

[29]  R. Furlan,et al.  Is hospital admission valuable in managing syncope? Results from the STePS study. , 2014, Cardiology journal.