Natural variation in male-induced ‘cost-of-mating’ and allele-specific association with male reproductive genes in Drosophila melanogaster

One of the most sharply defined sexual conflicts arises when the act of mating is accompanied by an inflated risk of death. Several reports have documented an increased death rate of female Drosophila as a result of recurrent mating. Transgenic and mutation experiments have further identified components of seminal fluid that are at least in part responsible for this toxicity. Variation among males in their tendency for matings to be toxic to their partners has also been documented, but here for the first time we identify polymorphism within particular genes conferring differential post-mating female mortality. Such polymorphism is important, as it raises the challenge of whether sexual conflict models can provide means for maintenance of polymorphism. Using a set of second chromosome extraction lines, we scored differences in post-mating female fecundity and longevity subsequent to mating, and identified significant among-line differences. Seventy polymorphisms in ten male reproductive genes were scored and permutation tests were used to identify significant associations between genotype and phenotype. One polymorphism upstream of PEBII and an amino acid substitution in CG17331 were both associated with male-induced female mortality. The same allele of CG17331 that is toxic to females also induces greater refractoriness to remating in the females, providing an example of an allele-specific sexual conflict. Postcopulatory sexual selection could lead to sexual conflict by favouring males that prevent their mates from mating, even when there is a viability cost to those females.

[1]  W. Rice,et al.  Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[2]  W. Eberhard Evolutionary Conflicts of Interest: Are Female Sexual Decisions Different? , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[3]  L. Partridge,et al.  Sex and Death: What Is the Connection? , 2005, Cell.

[4]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sex Peptide Causes Mating Costs in Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2005, Current Biology.

[5]  A. Clark,et al.  Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila melanogaster Associated With Variation in Male Reproductive Proteins , 2005, Genetics.

[6]  W. Eberhard RAPID DIVERGENT EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL MORPHOLOGY: COMPARATIVE TESTS OF ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION AND TRADITIONAL FEMALE CHOICE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  R. Knell,et al.  Sexually transmitted diseases of insects: distribution, evolution, ecology and host behaviour , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  T. Pizzari,et al.  SEXUAL CONFLICT AND SEXUAL SELECTION: MEASURING ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION , 2004 .

[9]  G. Arnqvist SEXUAL CONFLICT AND SEXUAL SELECTION: LOST IN THE CHASE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  O. Martin,et al.  Reproductive Consequences of Population Divergence through Sexual Conflict , 2004, Current Biology.

[11]  D. Kemp,et al.  A survival cost to mating in a polyandrous butterfly, Colias eurytheme , 2004 .

[12]  A. Clark,et al.  Genetic Basis of Natural Variation in D. melanogaster Antibacterial Immunity , 2004, Science.

[13]  W. Eberhard Male–female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  E. H. Morrow,et al.  Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  K. Reinhardt,et al.  Reducing a cost of traumatic insemination: female bedbugs evolve a unique organ , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? , 2003 .

[17]  T. Miyatake,et al.  Costs of mating and egg production in female Callosobruchus chinensis. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[18]  E. Kubli,et al.  Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  L. Partridge,et al.  The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  T. Pizzari,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SEXUAL CONFLICT AND SEXUAL SELECTION: CHASING AWAY PARADIGM SHIFTS , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  J. Belote,et al.  Expression of proteasome subunit isoforms during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Insect molecular biology.

[23]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  L. Rowe,et al.  SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION IN A MATING SYSTEM: COMBINING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO ADDRESS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  W. Rice,et al.  The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  L. Rowe,et al.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects , 2002, Nature.

[27]  W. Swanson,et al.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  W. Rice,et al.  Intersexual ontogenetic conflict , 2001 .

[29]  W. Rice,et al.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Clark,et al.  Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Siva-jothy,et al.  Genital damage, kicking and early death , 2000, Nature.

[32]  L. Keller,et al.  How Males Can Gain by Harming Their Mates: Sexual Conflict, Seminal Toxins, and the Cost of Mating , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[33]  W. Rice,et al.  Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  G. Parker,et al.  Sexual conflict and speciation. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[35]  W. Rice,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE‐AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  W. Rice,et al.  The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  L. Partridge,et al.  Sexual conflict as fuel for evolution , 1996, Nature.

[38]  W. Rice Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution , 1996, Nature.

[39]  L. Partridge,et al.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products , 1995, Nature.

[40]  R. Doerge,et al.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. , 1994, Genetics.

[41]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Cell type-specific gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster male accessory gland , 1992, Mechanisms of Development.

[42]  W. Rice Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. , 1992, Science.

[43]  C. Magnhagen Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Structure, cell-specific expression, and mating-induced regulation of a Drosophila melanogaster male accessory gland gene. , 1990, Developmental biology.

[45]  L. Partridge,et al.  A cost of mating in female fruitflies , 1989, Nature.

[46]  M. Bienz,et al.  A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster , 1988, Cell.

[47]  A. Civetta,et al.  Quantitative trait loci and interaction effects responsible for variation in female postmating mortality in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia introgression lines , 2005, Heredity.

[48]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sexual conflict , 2002 .

[49]  N. Michiels 7 – Mating Conflicts and Sperm Competition in Simultaneous Hermaphrodites , 1998 .

[50]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition and sexual selection , 1998 .

[51]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION AND SEXUAL CONFLICT , 1979 .

[52]  T. E. Moore,et al.  Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects , 1979 .

[53]  W. Baumeister,et al.  The Proteasome: Paradigm Review of a Self-compartmentalizing Protease , 2022 .