Engaging with the public in public engagement with research

Though there is now growing commitment to publicly engaged research, the role and definition of the public in such processes is wide-ranging, contested, and often rather vague. This article addresses this problem by showing that, although there is no single agreed upon theory or way of being public, it is still possible and very important to develop clear, public-centric, understandings of engaged research practice. The article introduces a multi-dimensional framework based on the theoretical literature on the ‘public’, and demonstrates – in the context of a recent engaged research project – how it possible to conceptualise, design and evaluate context-specific formations of the public. Starting from an understanding of publics as mediated and dynamic entities, the article seeks to illuminate some of the choices that researchers face and how the framework can help them navigate these. This article is for all those interested in what it means to address, support and account for an engaged public in contemporary settings.

[1]  S. Pell.  Mobilizing Urban Publics, Imagining Democratic Possibilities , 2014 .

[2]  Ien Ang.  From Cultural Studies to Cultural Research: Engaged Scholarship in the Twenty-first Century , 2011 .

[3]  Mark R. Johnson.  Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics , 2013 .

[4]  Kevin Orr,et al.  Reflexivity in the co‐production of academic‐practitioner research , 2009 .

[5]  Nick Mahony,et al.  Marketing practices and the reconfiguration of public action , 2016 .

[6]  Les Back,et al.  A Manifesto for Live Methods: Provocations and Capacities , 2012 .

[7]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[8]  S. Jackson.  Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics , 2011 .

[9]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[10]  M. Bucchi,et al.  Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions , 2011 .

[11]  J. Urry,et al.  Enacting the social , 2004 .

[12]  Mike Savage,et al.  The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A Critical Introduction , 2013 .

[13]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops , 2005 .

[14]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations , 2008 .

[15]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Deliberating Competence , 2008 .

[16]  Nick Mahony,et al.  Public crises, public futures , 2013 .

[17]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[18]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Remaking participation : science, environment and emergent publics , 2016 .

[19]  S. Igo.  The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public , 2007 .

[20]  O. Schmidtke,et al.  Rethinking the Public Sphere , 2013 .

[21]  Robert C. Richards,et al.  The Potential of Participedia as a Crowdsourcing Tool for Comparative Analysis of Democratic Innovations , 2015 .

[22]  N. Marres,et al.  Materials and devices of the public: an introduction , 2011 .

[23]  Tom Middlebro,et al.  Culture and Democracy , 1994 .

[24]  Hilde C. Stephansen,et al.  The frontiers of participatory public engagement , 2016 .

[25]  B. Santos.  Public Sphere and Epistemologies of the South , 2012 .

[26]  J. Gilbert.  Common Ground: Democracy and Collectivity in an Age of Individualism , 2013 .

[27]  S. Dawson.  Keywords: a Vocabulary of Culture and Society , 1976 .

[28]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere , 2007 .

[29]  M. Michael,et al.  On the Shoulders of Idiots: Re-thinking Science Communication as ‘Event’ , 2011 .

[30]  J. Brewer.  The public value of the social sciences : an interpretative essay , 2013 .

[31]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software , 2008 .

[32]  Brian Bernhardt.  Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work , 2018, New Political Science.

[33]  W. Dickson.  The art of listening. , 1979, Pharmacy management combined with the American journal of pharmacy : PM.

[34]  M. Burawoy.  2004 American Sociological Association Presidential address: for public sociology*. , 2005, The British journal of sociology.

[35]  James Tansey,et al.  Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project , 2006 .

[36]  C. Barnett,et al.  Rethinking the Public: Innovations in Research, Theory and Politics , 2010 .

[37]  Hilde C. Stephansen.  Understanding citizen media as practice: agents, processes, publics , 2016 .

[38]  A. Kluge,et al.  Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere , 1993 .

[39]  L. Back.  Live Sociology: Social Research and its Futures , 2012 .

[40]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[41]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. , 1993 .

[42]  C. Barnett.  Theorising emergent public spheres : negotiating democracy, development, and dissent , 2014 .

[43]  C. Mouffe.  Which Public Sphere for a Democratic Society , 2002 .

[44]  Janus Hansen,et al.  Democratic theory and citizen participation: democracy models in the evaluation of public participation in science and technology , 2011 .

[45]  D. Gaonkar.  Publics and counterpublics , 2002 .

[46]  C. Barnett.  Culture and Democracy: Media, Space, and Representation , 2003 .

[47]  C. Calhoun.  Plurality, promises, and public spaces , 1997 .

[48]  Paul D. Pickell,et al.  Cruel optimism , 2013 .

[49]  C. Kelty.  From Participation to Power , 2012 .