The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches

Abstract Mulches on the soil surface are known to suppress weed emergence, but the quantitative relationships between emergence and mulch properties have not been clearly defined. A theoretical framework for describing the relationships among mulch mass, area index, height, cover, light extinction, and weed emergence is introduced. This theory is applied to data from experiments on emergence of four annual weed species through mulches of selected materials applied at six rates. Mulch materials, in order from lowest to highest surface-area-to-mass ratio, were bark chips, Zea mays stalks, Secale cereale, Trifolium incarnatum, Vicia villosa, Quercus leaves, and landscape fabric strips. The order of weed species' sensitivity to mulches was Amaranthus retroflexus > Chenopodium album > Setaria faberi > Abutilon theophrasti, regardless of mulch material. The success of emergence through mulches was related to the capacity of seedlings to grow around obstructing mulch elements under limiting light conditions. Mulch area index was a pivotal property for quantitatively defining mulch properties and understanding weed emergence through mulches. A two-parameter model of emergence as a function of mulch area index and fraction of mulch volume that was solid reasonably predicted emergence across the range of mulches investigated. Nomenclature: Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTH, velvetleaf; Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMARE, redroot pigweed; Chenopodium album L. CHEAL, common lambsquarters; Setaria faberi Herrm. SETFA, giant foxtail; Quercus alba L., white oak; Quercus montana Willd., chestnut oak; Secale cereale L., rye; Trifolium incarnatum L., crimson clover; Vicia villosa Roth, hairy vetch; Zea mays L., corn.

[1]  F. Forcella Real-time assessment of seed dormancy and seedling growth for weed management , 1998, Seed Science Research.

[2]  T. Mester,et al.  The effect of maize residues and tillage on emergence of Setaria faberi, Abutilon theophrasti, Amaranthus retroflexus and Chenopodium album , 1996 .

[3]  C. L. Mohler,et al.  Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue , 1993 .

[4]  Robert P. King,et al.  Weed Management Decisions in Corn Based on Bioeconomic Modeling , 1991, Weed Science.

[5]  A. D. Worsham,et al.  Allelopathic Potential of Legume Debris and Aqueous Extracts , 1989, Weed Science.

[6]  A. D. Worsham,et al.  Effects of clover and small grain cover crops and tillage techniques on seedling emergence of some dicotyledonous weed species , 1997 .

[7]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  A Bioeconomic Model for Weed Management in Corn and Soybean , 1991 .

[8]  J. Teasdale,et al.  Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye , 1993 .

[9]  C. Wagner-Riddle,et al.  Rye mulch characterization for the purpose of microclimatic modelling , 1996 .

[10]  James M. Gregory,et al.  Soil Cover Prediction with Various Amounts and Types of Crop Residue , 1982 .

[11]  L. Wax,et al.  An Index Model for Predicting Seed Germination and Emergence Rates , 1993, Weed Technology.

[12]  John Cardina,et al.  Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination II: development of very low fluence sensitivity , 1998, Weed Science.

[13]  T. T. Bauman,et al.  Surface Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Residues, Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi), and Soybean (Glycine max) Yield , 1996, Weed Science.

[14]  S. Pickett,et al.  PLANT LITTER: LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND EFFECTS ON AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1991 .

[15]  C. L. Mohler A Model of the Effects of Tillage on Emergence of Weed Seedlings. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  R. Reader,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter , 1995 .

[17]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management , 1998, Weed Science.