A media analysis approach to evaluating national health information infrastructure development

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate electronic health record (EHR) initiatives at the national/external level. Governments are investing large amounts of money in national EHR systems. These systems are socially and politically complex and a variety of stakeholders (e.g. at the individual, organisational or national level) have an interest in evaluating such systems from technical, economic or patient outcome perspectives. In cognisance of academic research in the area, this paper presents an approach which uses the perspective of one particular type of professional critic, the media, to identify issues and evaluate their impact at a national level.Design/methodology/approach – The work is conducted using an established evaluation framework and formal content analysis of selected relevant articles from the quality press of three selected countries.Findings – Different issues take prominence in centralised vs decentralised EHR approaches. In countries with a decentralised approach issues of ...

[1]  Marcus Watson,et al.  Leximancer Concept Mapping of Patient Case Studies , 2005, KES.

[2]  Andrew Goodchild,et al.  Using Complex Systems Techniques to Aid Health Software Design , 2005 .

[3]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[4]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Don E. Detmer,et al.  Learning from Abroad: Lessons and Questions on Personal Health Records for National Policy , 2006 .

[6]  E. Stice,et al.  Relations of bulimic symptom frequency and intensity to psychosocial impairment and health care utilization: results from a community-recruited sample. , 2007, The International journal of eating disorders.

[7]  D. Snowden,et al.  A leader's framework for decision making , 2007 .

[8]  Nicolette de Keizer,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002 , 2005 .

[9]  Jeremy C. Wyatt,et al.  When and how to evaluate health information systems? , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Annabelle L. Mark,et al.  Modernising healthcare – is the NPfIT for purpose? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  It-Enabled Healthcare Delivery: The U.K. National Health Service , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  S. Paxton,et al.  Pathways to help-seeking in bulimia nervosa and binge eating problems: a concept mapping approach. , 2007, The International journal of eating disorders.

[13]  Moritz Y. Becker Information governance in NHS's NPfIT: A case for policy specification , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system , 1994 .

[15]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Sean Brennan,et al.  The biggest computer programme in the world ever! How's it going? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  E. Coiera,et al.  Lessons from the NHS National Programme for IT , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  Ken Eason,et al.  Local sociotechnical system development in the NHS National Programme for Information Technology , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Tina Blegind Jensen,et al.  How Healthcare Professionals “Make Sense” of an Electronic Patient Record Adoption , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[20]  A. Hoerbst,et al.  Electronic Health Records , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[21]  Bradford H Gray,et al.  Electronic health records: an international perspective on "meaningful use". , 2011, Issue brief.

[22]  Paul Crompton,et al.  The National Programme for Information Technology – An Overview , 2007, Journal of visual communication in medicine.

[23]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Unreasonable expectations – NHS IT, Greek choruses and the games institutions play around mega-programmes , 2007 .

[24]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem , 1998 .

[25]  John Fulcher,et al.  Consent Mechanisms for Electronic Health Record Systems: A Simple Yet Unresolved Issue , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.

[26]  Dan Ionescu,et al.  Privacy and security shield for health information systems (e-Health) , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Charles Safran,et al.  CareWeb™, a web-based medical record for an integrated health care delivery system , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  T Beale,et al.  The Health Record - why is it so hard? , 2005, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[30]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  David Snowden,et al.  Researching Practice or Practicing Research : Innovating Methods in Healthcare-The Contribution of Cynefin , 2007 .

[32]  Heather Grain E-Consent Design and Implementation Issues for Health Information Managers , 2004, Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia.

[33]  Brian Randell A computer scientist's reactions to NPfIT , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Future Directions in Evaluation Research: People, Organizational, and Social Issues , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[35]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  ‘The biggest computer programme in the world…ever!’: time for a change in mindset? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Annabelle Mark,et al.  Notes from a small Island: researching organisational behaviour in healthcare from a UK perspective , 2006 .

[38]  N. A. D. Connell,et al.  Evaluating healthcare information systems through an "enterprise" perspective , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[40]  D. Kalra,et al.  Healthcare computer systems—global approaches , 2005, The Lancet.

[41]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  An investigation of the factors affecting the successful treatment of organisational issues in systems development projects , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Jane Hendy,et al.  Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Implementing the National Programme for IT: what can we learn from the Scottish experience? , 2005, Informatics in primary care.

[44]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Implementation of a patient safety incident management system as viewed by doctors, nurses and allied health professionals , 2009, Health.

[45]  J. Burmeister,et al.  Observations in a maternity ward: Usability considerations for EHRs in an interrupt driven environment , 2004 .

[46]  Craig Standing,et al.  An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  John H. Cousins,et al.  Scanning the horizon: emerging hospital-wide technologies and their impact on critical care , 2005, Critical care.

[48]  Raj Gururajan,et al.  Clinical usefulness of handheld wireless technology in healthcare: A cross-national study of Australia and India , 2008, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[49]  Tony Cornford,et al.  A critical approach to evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Evelyn J. S. Hovenga,et al.  Nursing constraint models for electronic health records: A vision for domain knowledge governance , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[51]  M Carter Integrated electronic health records and patient privacy: possible benefits but real dangers , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[52]  N. D. de Keizer,et al.  An Inventory of Evaluation Studies of Information Technology in Health Care , 2005, Methods of Information in Medicine.