In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging.

Traditional methods for studying tree roots are destructive and labor intensive, but available nondestructive techniques are applicable only to small scale studies or are strongly limited by soil conditions and root size. Soil electrical resistivity measured by geoelectrical methods has the potential to detect belowground plant structures, but quantitative relationships of these measurements with root traits have not been assessed. We tested the ability of two-dimensional (2-D) DC resistivity tomography to detect the spatial variability of roots and to quantify their biomass in a tree stand. A high-resolution resistivity tomogram was generated along a 11.75 m transect under an Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. stand based on an alpha-Wenner configuration with 48 electrodes spaced 0.25 m apart. Data were processed by a 2-D finite-element inversion algorithm, and corrected for soil temperature. Data acquisition, inversion and imaging were completed in the field within 60 min. Root dry mass per unit soil volume (root mass density, RMD) was measured destructively on soil samples collected to a depth of 1.05 m. Soil sand, silt, clay and organic matter contents, electrical conductivity, water content and pH were measured on a subset of samples. The spatial pattern of soil resistivity closely matched the spatial distribution of RMD. Multiple linear regression showed that only RMD and soil water content were related to soil resistivity along the transect. Regression analysis of RMD against soil resistivity revealed a highly significant logistic relationship (n = 97), which was confirmed on a separate dataset (n = 67), showing that soil resistivity was quantitatively related to belowground tree root biomass. This relationship provides a basis for developing quick nondestructive methods for detecting root distribution and quantifying root biomass, as well as for optimizing sampling strategies for studying root-driven phenomena.

[1]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[2]  S. A. Hagrey Geophysical imaging of root-zone, trunk, and moisture heterogeneity , 2007 .

[3]  William John McCarter,et al.  The electrical resistivity characteristics of compacted clays , 1984 .

[4]  G. Celano,et al.  Net CO2 storage in mediterranean olive and peach orchards , 2005 .

[5]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[6]  James A. Doolittle,et al.  Utility of ground-penetrating radar as a root biomass survey tool in forest systems , 2003 .

[7]  A. Binley,et al.  A saline trace test monitored via time-lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography. , 2006 .

[8]  N. E. Miller,et al.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Norby Issues and perspectives for investigating root responses to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide , 1994, Plant and Soil.

[10]  J. Cermak,et al.  Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[11]  W. Daily,et al.  The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data , 1996 .

[12]  J A Doolittle,et al.  Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[13]  F. Dijkstra,et al.  Interactions between soil and tree roots accelerate long-term soil carbon decomposition. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[14]  E. J. Morton,et al.  Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[15]  R J Hanks,et al.  INFLUENCE OF WATER CONTENT ON ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF THE SOIL , 1972 .

[16]  Jeffery J. Roberts,et al.  Electrical properties of partially saturated Topopah Spring Tuff: Water distribution as a function of saturation , 1997 .

[17]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .

[18]  A. Hunt,et al.  Dependence of the Electrical Conductivity on Saturation in Real Porous Media , 2006 .

[19]  M. Amato,et al.  Root length and biomass losses during sample preparation with different screen mesh sizes , 1994, Plant and Soil.

[20]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Analyzing the effects of climate variability on spatial pattern of yield in a maize-wheat-soybean rotation , 2007 .

[21]  S. A. Hagrey,et al.  Hydro-, bio-geophysics , 2004 .

[22]  M. Dabas,et al.  Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation , 2000 .

[23]  L. A. Richards,et al.  Change of Electrical Conductivity With Temperature and the Relation of Osmotic Pressure to Electrical Conductivity and Ion Concentration for Soil Extracts , 1949 .

[24]  A. Hunt Continuum percolation theory and Archie's law , 2004 .

[25]  P. Kearey,et al.  An introduction to geophysical exploration , 1984 .

[26]  T. Fahey,et al.  Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects. , 2006, Ecology.

[27]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[28]  N. Pollen Temporal and spatial variability in root reinforcement of streambanks: Accounting for soil shear strength and moisture , 2007 .

[29]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[30]  Jan Cermak,et al.  Instrumental methods for studies of structure and function of root systems of large trees. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  C. Barton,et al.  Detection of tree roots and determination of root diameters by ground penetrating radar under optimal conditions. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[32]  S. M. Seth,et al.  ESTIMATION OF TEMPORAL CHANGES IN SOIL MOISTURE USING RESISTIVITY METHOD , 1996 .

[33]  H. Boizard,et al.  Structural heterogeneity of the soil tilled layer as characterized by 2D electrical resistivity surveying , 2004 .

[34]  A. Sato,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography , 2001 .

[35]  F. Day,et al.  EFFECT OF ELEVATED CO 2 ON COARSE-ROOT BIOMASS IN FLORIDA SCRUB DETECTED BY GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR , 2007 .

[36]  B. Drake,et al.  Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. , 2007, Ecology.

[37]  B. Nicoullaud,et al.  Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography , 2003 .

[38]  P. Schmalzer,et al.  Dynamics of vegetation and soils of oak/saw palmetto scrub after fire: Observations from permanent transects , 1991 .

[39]  C. Skaar Wood-Water Relations , 1988, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[40]  T. Miyamoto,et al.  Effects of Liquid-phase Electrical Conductivity, Water Content, and Surface Conductivity on Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity1 , 1976 .

[41]  Yves Benderitter,et al.  On the effectiveness of 2D electrical inversion results: an agricultural case study , 2001 .

[42]  John R. Butnor,et al.  Imaging tree roots with borehole radar , 2006 .

[43]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[44]  E. J. Morton,et al.  Non-invasive imaging of roots with high resolution X-ray micro-tomography , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[45]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Imaging for Detecting Soil Cracking at the Centimetric Scale , 2003 .

[46]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density , 1988, Plant and Soil.

[47]  A. Klute,et al.  Physical and mineralogical methods , 1986 .

[48]  C. Moran,et al.  X-ray absorption and phase contrast imaging to study the interplay between plant roots and soil structure , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[49]  G. Palacky Clay mapping using electromagnetic methods , 1987 .

[50]  S. A. Hagrey,et al.  Electrical resistivity imaging of tree trunks , 2006 .

[51]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Spatial distribution of roots and water uptake of Maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by soil structure. , 2002 .