Multimodal 3D rigid image registration based on expectation maximization

Image registration is an important task in medical imaging, capable of finding displacement fields to align two images of the same anatomic structure under different conditions (e.g. acquisition time and body position). Specifically, multimodal image registration is the process of aligning two or more images of the same scene using different image acquisition techniques. In fact, most of the current image registration approaches are based on Mutual Information (MI) as a similarity metric for image comparison; however, the cost function used in MI methods is difficult to optimize due to complex relationships between variables and pixels intensities. This work presents an Expectation Maximization (EM) 3D multimodal rigid registration approach, which introduces a low computational cost alternative with a linear optimization strategy and an intuitive relation among the free variables. Our approach was validated against a state-of-the-art MI-based technique with synthetic T1 MRI brain volumes. The EM 3D achieved a global average DICE index of 96.68 % with a computational time of 22.72 seconds, whereas the MI methodology reported 96.11 % and 35.13 seconds, respectively.

[1]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Daniel U. Campos-Delgado,et al.  Non-rigid Multimodal Image Registration Based on the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm , 2013, PSIVT.

[4]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Image registration improves human knee cartilage T1 mapping with delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) , 2012, European Radiology.

[5]  François-Xavier Vialard,et al.  Piecewise-diffeomorphic image registration: Application to the motion estimation between 3D CT lung images with sliding conditions , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Daniel U. Campos-Delgado,et al.  Multimodal image registration based on the expectation-maximisation methodology , 2017, IET Image Process..

[7]  D. Hill,et al.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Simon Baker,et al.  Equivalence and efficiency of image alignment algorithms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[10]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Wiro J Niessen,et al.  Influence of image registration on apparent diffusion coefficient images computed from free‐breathing diffusion MR images of the abdomen , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Improving alignment in Tract-based spatial statistics: Evaluation and optimization of image registration , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  Enrico Puppo,et al.  New Trends in Image Analysis and Processing -- ICIAP 2015 Workshops , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.