Developing a Business Case for Housing Governance

Abstract In the past 20 years, Malaysia's housing prices have steadily outpaced its residents’ incomes and outstripped inflation. The size of the property overhang is increasing. Costs and delays in housing construction are high. Foreclosures and dissatisfactions are becoming more frequent. Homeownership is sliding at approximately 1% annually. Consequently, governments have introduced various schemes and programmes and many policies have been formulated and implemented. Notwithstanding these measures, the housing market has remained increasingly volatile. Because of this, it is pertinent to revisit the literature and empirical proof to determine the relevance of the governance theory to advancing housing delivery. This study has two objectives. The first is to explain the roles of governance as a framework to increase homeownerships. The second is to identify the critical success factors (CSFs) in affordable housing delivery. The results support the researchers’ hypothesis that the application of governance theory provides a fresh insight to affordable delivery. The results are useful to policy makers, developers, banks, consultants, housing associations and academics. This study lays the foundation for future research and for forming CSFs that will allow meaningful applications and interpretations of governance frameworks for different projects.

[1]  James P. Stevens,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences : Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS, Sixth Edition , 2015 .

[2]  Sofia Pemsel,et al.  Organizational enablers for governance and governmentality of projects: A literature review , 2014 .

[3]  Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz,et al.  Housing Affordability Problems among Young Households , 2016 .

[4]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[5]  Roger Miller,et al.  The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance , 2001 .

[6]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[7]  Strategies For Affordable Housing Delivery , 2015 .

[8]  Laurence Lecoeuvre,et al.  Operationalizing governance categories of projects , 2014 .

[9]  R. Müller,et al.  The Relationship Between Project Governance and Project Success , 2016, Project Management Methodologies, Governance and Success.

[10]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Moran,et al.  GOVERNANCE THEORY AND PRACTICE: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH - by Vasudha Chhotray and Gerry Stoker , 2009 .

[12]  M. Bekker Project Governance – The Definition and Leadership Dilemma☆ , 2015 .

[13]  Wan Nor Azriyati Wan Abd Aziz,et al.  The state intervention in achieving a quality urban living standard , 2008 .

[14]  Ralf Müller,et al.  A framework for governance of projects: Governmentality, governance structure and projectification , 2016 .

[15]  Abdul Ghani Salleh NEIGHBOURHOOD FACTORS IN PRIVATE LOW-COST HOUSING IN MALAYSIA , 2008 .

[16]  K. Artto,et al.  What is project governance and what are its origins , 2014 .

[17]  Mohammad Abdul Mohit,et al.  Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 2010 .

[18]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Effects of project governance structures on the management of risks in major infrastructure projects: A comparative analysis , 2014 .

[19]  Kok Wei Khong,et al.  The Link between Homeownership Motivation and Housing Satisfaction , 2012 .

[20]  Monique Aubry,et al.  The three dimensions of a governance framework for major public projects , 2016 .

[21]  Christian Luiz da Silva,et al.  Governance structure and transaction cost: relationship between strategy and asset specificity , 2007 .

[22]  J. Söderlund Pluralism in Project Management: Navigating the Crossroads of Specialization and Fragmentation , 2011 .