Dynamic Performance Measures for Object Tracking Systems

Performance evaluation of object tracking systems is typically performed after the data has been processed, by comparing tracking results to ground truth. Whilst this approach is fine when performing offline testing, it does not allow for real-time analysis of the systems performance, which may be of use for live systems to either automatically tune the system or report reliability. In this paper, we propose three metrics that can be used to dynamically asses the performance of an object tracking system. Outputs and results from various stages in the tracking system are used to obtain measures that indicate the performance of motion segmentation, object detection and object matching. The proposed dynamic metrics are shown to accurately indicate tracking errors when visually comparing metric results to tracking output, and are shown to display similar trends to the ETISEO metrics when comparing different tracking configurations.

[1]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  An appearance-based body model for multiple people tracking , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[2]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Adaptive Optical Flow for Person Tracking , 2005, Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA'05).

[3]  Dimitrios Makris,et al.  Performance evaluation of object tracking algorithms , 2007 .

[4]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  Multi-sensor tracking using a scalable condensation filter , 2008 .

[5]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Tracking multiple humans in complex situations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  François Brémond,et al.  ETISEO, performance evaluation for video surveillance systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance.

[7]  Sridha Sridharan,et al.  A Multi-Class Tracker Using a Scalable Condensation Filter , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Video and Signal Based Surveillance.

[8]  A. Senior,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Surveillance Systems Under Varying Conditions , 2004 .