3D Heterogeneous Stiffness Reconstruction Using MRI and the Virtual Fields Method

The first extension of the virtual fields method to the reconstruction of heterogeneous stiffness properties from 3D bulk full-field displacement data is presented in this paper. Data are provided by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Two main issues are addressed: 1. the identification of the stiffness ratio between two different media in a heterogeneous solid; 2. the reconstruction of stiffness heterogeneities buried in a heterogeneous solid. The approach is based on a finite element discretization of the equilibrium equations. It is tested on experimental full-field data obtained on a phantom with the stimulated echo MRI technique. The phantom is made of a stiff spherical inclusion buried within a lower modulus material. Preliminary independent tests showed that the material of the inclusion was four times stiffer than the surrounding material. This ratio value is correctly identified by our approach directly on the phantom with the MRI data. Moreover, the modulus distribution is promisingly reconstructed across the whole investigated volume. However, the resulting modulus distribution is highly variable. This is explained by the fact that the approach relies on a second order differentiation of the data, which tends to amplify noise. Noise is significantly reduced by using appropriate filtering algorithms.

[1]  M.A. Lubinski,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of the lateral displacement using tissue incompressibility , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Fabrice Pierron,et al.  Identification of stiffness and damping properties of thin isotropic vibrating plates using the virtual fields method: theory and simulations , 2005 .

[3]  A.R. Skovoroda,et al.  Tissue elasticity reconstruction based on ultrasonic displacement and strain images , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  G Crosta Mathematical Review: MR2044619 (2005b:74051) Barbone, Paul E.; Gokhale, Nachiket H. Elastic modulus imaging: on the uniqueness and nonuniqueness of the elastography inverse problem in two dimensions , 2005 .

[5]  A. Maniatty,et al.  Shear modulus reconstruction in dynamic elastography: time harmonic case , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Joyce R. McLaughlin,et al.  Unique identifiability of elastic parameters from time-dependent interior displacement measurement , 2004 .

[7]  J. Shirron,et al.  On the noninvasive determination of material parameters from a knowledge of elastic displacements theory and numerical simulation , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Huy Duong Bui,et al.  Inverse Problems in the Mechanics of Materials: An Introduction , 1994 .

[9]  S Y Emelianov,et al.  Elasticity reconstructive imaging by means of stimulated echo MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J. F. Greenleaf,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[11]  J. M. Huntley,et al.  Temporal phase-unwrapping algorithm for automated interferogram analysis. , 1993, Applied optics.

[12]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  A finite element formulation to identify damage fields: the equilibrium gap method , 2004 .

[13]  Assad A Oberai,et al.  Elastic modulus imaging: some exact solutions of the compressible elastography inverse problem , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  The Virtual Fields Method for Extracting Constitutive Parameters From Full‐Field Measurements: a Review , 2006 .

[15]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  General framework for the identification of constitutive parameters from full-field measurements in linear elasticity , 2007 .

[16]  Peter M. Pinsky,et al.  Recovery of shear modulus in elastography using an adjoint method with B-spline representation , 2005 .

[17]  Michel Grédiac,et al.  Principe des travaux virtuels et identification , 1989 .

[18]  Paul E. Barbone,et al.  Elastic modulus imaging: On the uniqueness and nonuniqueness of the elastography inverse problem in , 2004 .

[19]  Stéphane Avril,et al.  Sensitivity of the virtual fields method to noisy data , 2004 .

[20]  David A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The State of the Art in Numerical Analysis. , 1978 .

[21]  Jonathan Ophir,et al.  Comparative evaluation of strain-based and model-based modulus elastography. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  S Y Emelianov,et al.  Three-dimensional static displacement, stimulated echo NMR elasticity imaging. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  I. Duff,et al.  The state of the art in numerical analysis , 1997 .

[24]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Reconstructive elasticity imaging for large deformations , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  A.R. Skovoroda,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Modulus of Small Tissue Samples , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[26]  Fabrice Pierron,et al.  The virtual fields method with piecewise virtual fields , 2006 .

[27]  J. Fehrenbach,et al.  Detection of small inclusions by elastography , 2006 .

[28]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[29]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[30]  John B Weaver,et al.  Imaging the shear modulus of the heel fat pads. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[31]  Raffaella Righetti,et al.  DOSSIER IMAGERIE ACOUSTIQUE ET OPTIQUE DES MILIEUX BIOLOGIQUES OPTICAL AND ACOUSTICAL IMAGING OF BIOLOGICAL MEDIA Elastography , 2001 .

[32]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Inverse problems in elasticity , 2005 .