The Trial-Heat Forecast of the 2008 Presidential Vote: Performance and Value Considerations in an Open-Seat Election

The trial-heat forecasting equation grew out of an examination of Gallup's trial-heat polls (“if the election were held today, who would you vote for?”) at various points in election years as predictors of the November vote (Campbell and Wink 1990). My co-author Ken Wink and I found, not surprisingly, that polls as literal forecasts were not very accurate until just before the election, that taking the historical relationship between the polls and votes into account through a bivariate regression significantly increased their accuracy, and that taking the contemporary context of the election as measured by economic growth in the election year into account increased their accuracy even further. Corroborating Lewis-Beck and Rice's earlier finding (Lewis-Beck 1985, 58), we found that an equation combining the Labor Day trial-heat poll standing of the in-party candidate and the second-quarter growth rate in the economy produced the most accurate forecast of the national two-party popular vote.

[1]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Political Control of the Economy , 1978 .

[2]  James E. Campbell.  The Referendum that Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election , 2001, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[3]  William G. Mayer.  The Swing Voter in American Politics , 2008 .

[4]  W. Lippmann.  The Phantom Public , 1925 .

[5]  J. Hampton,et al.  The people's choice. , 2001, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[6]  James E. Campbell.  American Campaign, Second Edition: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote , 2008 .

[7]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Economics and Elections , 1990 .

[8]  P. Lazarsfeld.  THE ELECTION IS OVER , 1944 .

[9]  James E. Campbell,et al.  Trial-Heat Forecasts of the Presidential Vote , 1990 .

[10]  R. Katz.  Retrospective Voting in American National Elections . By Morris P. Fiorina. (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981. Pp. xii + 249. $35.00, cloth; $9.95, paper.) , 1982 .

[11]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[12]  M. Lewis-Beck,et al.  National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[13]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[14]  James E. Campbell.  Polls and Votes , 1996 .

[15]  James E. Campbell.  An Evaluation of the Trial-Heat and Economy Forecast of the Presidential Vote in the 2000 Election , 2001 .

[16]  H. Norpoth.  On a short leash: Term limits and the economic voter , 2002 .

[17]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[18]  H. Weisberg.  Partisanship and Incumbency in Presidential Elections , 2002 .

[19]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  When Good Forecasts Go Bad: The Time-for-Change Model and the 2004 Presidential Election , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[20]  R. Davidson,et al.  Understanding the Presidency , 1996 .

[21]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Throwing the Rascals Out: Policy and Performance Evaluations of Presidential Candidates, 1952–1980 , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[22]  C. Beem.  Because There is a War on , 2001, The Review of Politics.

[23]  E. Tufte,et al.  Political Control of the Economy. , 1980 .

[24]  James C. Garand,et al.  Before the vote : forecasting American national elections , 2000 .

[25]  J. R. Alford,et al.  The Electoral Impact of Economic Conditions: Who is Held Responsible? , 1981 .

[26]  James D. King.  Incumbent Popularity and Vote Choice in Gubernatorial Elections , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[27]  Andrew K. Overton.  Forecast Accuracy , 2005 .

[28]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Election Forecasts in 1984: How Accurate Were They? , 1985 .