The Effect of Simulated Microgravity by Three-Dimensional Clinostat on Bone Tissue Engineering

Evidence suggests that mechanical stress, including gravity, is associated with osteoblast differentiation and function. To examine effects of microgravity on bone tissue engineering, we used a three-dimensional (3D) clinostat manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Kobe, Japan). A 3D clinostat is a device that generates multidirectional G force. By controlled rotation on two axes, it cancels the cumulative gravity vector at the center of the device. We cultured rat marrow mesenchymal cells (MMCs) in the pores of interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite (IP-CHA) for 2 weeks in the presence of dexamethasone using the 3D clinostat (clinostat group). MMCs cultured using the 3D clinostat exhibited a 40% decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity (a marker of osteoblastic differentiation), compared with control static cultures (control group). SEM analysis revealed that although there was no difference between the two groups in number or distribution of cells in the pores, the clinostat group exhibited less extensive extracellular matrix formation than the control group. Cultured IP-CHA/MMC composites were then implanted into subcutaneous sites of syngeneic rats and harvested 8 weeks after implantation. All implants showed bone formation inside the pores, as indicated by decalcified histological sections and microfocus computed tomography. However, the volume of newly formed bone was significantly lower for the clinostat group than for the control group, especially in the superficial pores close to the implant surface. These results indicate that new bone formation in culture was inhibited by use of the 3D clinostat, and that this inhibition was mainly due to suppression of osteoblastic differentiation of MMCs.

[1]  J. McDonald,et al.  Modeled microgravity inhibits osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and increases adipogenesis. , 2004, Endocrinology.

[2]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Bone Tissue Engineering Using Novel Interconnected Porous Hydroxyapatite Ceramics Combined with Marrow Mesenchymal Cells: Quantitative and Three-Dimensional Image Analysis , 2004, Cell transplantation.

[3]  R. Bouillon,et al.  Microgravity Reduces the Differentiation of Human Osteoblastic MG‐63 Cells , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  S Tamai,et al.  Immediate bone forming capability of prefabricated osteogenic hydroxyapatite. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  C. Turner,et al.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  E. Burger,et al.  Decreased mineralization and increased calcium release in isolated fetal mouse long bones under near weightlessness , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  S Tamai,et al.  Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal stem cells in porous hydroxyapatite ceramics. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Biochemical and histological sequences of membranous ossification in ectopic site , 1992, Calcified Tissue International.

[9]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Heterotopic osteogenesis in porous ceramics induced by marrow cells , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  A I Caplan,et al.  Repair of bone defects with marrow cells and porous ceramic. Experiments in rats. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  C. Maniatopoulos,et al.  Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats , 1988, Cell and Tissue Research.

[12]  S. Doty,et al.  Histomorphometric analysis of rat skeleton following spaceflight. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  M. Spector,et al.  Spaceflight Results in Formation of Defective Bone 1 , 1985, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[14]  P. Rambaut,et al.  SKELETAL CHANGES DURING SPACE FLIGHT , 1985, The Lancet.

[15]  D B Kimmel,et al.  Effects of spaceflight on trabecular bone in rats. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  T. Wronski,et al.  Effect of spaceflight on periosteal bone formation in rats. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[17]  N. E. Sullivan,et al.  Matrix-induced endochondral bone differentiation: influence of hypophysectomy, growth hormone, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. , 1980, Endocrinology.

[18]  E R Morey,et al.  Inhibition of bone formation during space flight. , 1978, Science.

[19]  T. Kumagai,et al.  Cell differentiation and p38MARK cascade are inhibited in human osteoblasts cultured in a three-dimensional clinostat , 2003, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[20]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Novel hydroxyapatite ceramics with an interconnective porous structure exhibit superior osteoconduction in vivo. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  M. Asashima,et al.  Dome formation and tubule morphogenesis by Xenopus kidney A6 cell cultures exposed to microgravity simulated with a 3D-clinostat and to hypergravity , 2001, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[22]  A I Caplan,et al.  Stem cell technology and bioceramics: from cell to gene engineering. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Osteogenic capacity of rat and human marrow cells in porous ceramics. Experiments in athymic (nude) mice. , 1990, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[24]  D Chappard,et al.  Effects of weightlessness on bone mass and osteoclast number in pregnant rats after a five-day spaceflight (COSMOS 1514). , 1987, Bone.