Analyzing the information distribution in the fMRI measurements by estimating the degree of locality

In this study, we propose a new method for analyzing and representing the distribution of discriminative information for data acquired via functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). For this purpose, we form a spatially local mesh with varying size, around each voxel, called the seed voxel. The relationship among each seed voxel and its neighbors is estimated using a linear regression model by minimizing the square error. Then, we estimate the optimal mesh size that represents the connections among each seed voxel and its surroundings by minimizing Akaike's Final Prediction Error (FPE) with respect to the mesh size. The degree of locality is represented by the optimum mesh size. Our results indicate that the local mesh size with the highest discriminative power varies across individual participants. The proposed method was tested on an fMRI study consisting of item recognition (IR) and judgment of recency (JOR) tasks. For each participant, the estimated arc weights of each local mesh with different mesh size are used to classify the type of memory judgment (i.e.IR or JOR). Classification accuracy for each participant was derived using k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) method. The results indicate that the proposed local mesh model with optimal mesh size can successfully represent discriminative information for neuroimaging data.

[1]  H. Akaike Statistical predictor identification , 1970 .

[2]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI--an introductory guide. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[3]  P. Bandettini,et al.  What's New in Neuroimaging Methods? , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Pattern-information analysis: From stimulus decoding to computational-model testing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  The Theory of Linear Prediction , 2008, Synthesis Lectures on Signal Processing.

[7]  Fatos T. Yarman-Vural,et al.  Mesh learning approach for brain data modeling , 2012, 2012 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU).

[8]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Lila Davachi,et al.  Working Memory Retrieval: Contributions of the Left Prefrontal Cortex, the Left Posterior Parietal Cortex, and the Hippocampus , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Decoding and predicting intentions , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Theoretical, Statistical, and Practical Perspectives on Pattern-based Classification Approaches to the Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Xuchu Weng,et al.  Recent developments in multivariate pattern analysis for functional MRI , 2012, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[15]  H. Akaike Fitting autoregressive models for prediction , 1969 .

[16]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.