Measuring regional sustainable competitiveness: a multi-criteria approach

Competitiveness and sustainability are multidimensional concepts that are often measured using multiple indicators. In this paper, we are going to measure sustainable competiveness using a unique index. To do this, we work with the European Regional Competitiveness Index (RCI), which provides an overall but summarised view of territorial competitiveness for each of the NUTS 2 (Nomenclature of Units for Territorial Statistics) regions of the 28 European Union Member States. Although the RCI is a complete competitiveness index, it presents some limitations, as it does not take into account any aspect of an environmental character. In order to assess the sustainability of the NUTS 2 regions, several environmental indicators have been added to the RCI (emission of CO2, waste generated per capita, environmental investment of the public and private sector, among others). The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution permits aggregating these indicators to a new unified measurement of the regional sustainable competitiveness, the European Regional Sustainability Competitiveness Index, henceforth RSCI.

[1]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  A DEA Travel–Tourism Competitiveness Index , 2017 .

[2]  Abay Mulatu On the concept of 'competitiveness' and its usefulness for policy , 2016 .

[3]  R. Huggins Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking , 2003 .

[4]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Marko Danon Constructing a Novel Competitiveness Index for European Regions , 2014 .

[6]  Tao Song,et al.  Urban metabolism based on emergy and slack based model: A case study of Beijing, China , 2015, Chinese Geographical Science.

[7]  Nicolas Dechy,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  A. Bilbao-Terol,et al.  Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds , 2014 .

[9]  Abbas Mardani,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 , 2015 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[12]  N. Malys,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability , 2016 .

[13]  Sin-Jin Lin,et al.  Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach , 2013 .

[14]  Ozalp Vayvay,et al.  Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey , 2017 .

[15]  Jacques Poot,et al.  Reflections on Local and Economy-Wide Effects of Territorial Competition , 2000 .

[16]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Doing good by doing well: a MCDM framework for evaluating corporate social responsibility attractiveness , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Roman Guliak New Resonance Approach to Competitiveness Interventions in Lagging Regions: The Case of Ukraine before the Armed Conflict , 2017 .

[18]  Elina Dace,et al.  How do 28 European Union Member States perform in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? It depends on what we look at: Application of the multi-criteria analysis , 2016 .

[19]  Seyed Ali Rakhshan Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  J. Musango,et al.  Urban metabolism: A review with reference to Cape Town , 2017 .

[21]  Audronė Balkytė,et al.  Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development: Facets of “sustainable competitiveness” , 2010 .

[22]  P. Krugman,et al.  Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession , 1994 .

[23]  Ron Martin,et al.  Competitiveness, Productivity and Economic Growth across the European Regions , 2004 .

[24]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[25]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspective , 2000 .

[26]  P. Boulanger the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Surveys , 2022 .

[27]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[28]  David A. Swanson,et al.  On Estimating a De Facto Population and Its Components , 2011 .

[29]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[30]  Jose Manuel Cabello,et al.  Building Ease-of-Doing-Business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[31]  A. Milani,et al.  The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection , 2005 .

[32]  G. Munda Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy , 2007 .